HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 20-17 Intent to Levy CloistersRESOLUTION NO. 20-17
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY, CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING THE CITY'S INTENTION TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR
CLOISTERS LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
PURSUANT TO THE "LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972" (STREETS AND
HIGHWAYS SECTIONS 22500 ET.SEQ.)
THE .CITY COUNCIL
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, all property owners of the Cloisters subdivision requested the City of Morro
Bay form a maintenance assessment district to fund the maintenance of the Cloisters Park and
Open Space; and
WHEREAS, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Streets and Highways Code
sections 22500 et. seq.) (the "Act") enables the City to form assessment districts for the purpose
of maintaining public improvements; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 22623 of the Act, the City Engineer has filed in the Office
of the City Clerk, and submitted for review to the City Council, a report entitled "Engineer's Report
- Cloisters Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District", dated May 1, 2017,
prepared in accordance with Article 4 of the Act, commencing with Section 22565; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 22608.2 of the Act, the subdivider was required by City
Ordinance to install improvements for which an assessment district was required in order to
assure continued and uninterrupted maintenance of the Cloisters Park and Open Space; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the intent of Article XIII, Section 4, of the California Constitution,
thV property owners have elected to form the Cloisters Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance
Assessment District,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Morro Bay,
Section 1. The City Council approves the Engineer's Report.
Section 2. It is the intent of the Council to order the annual levy and collection of
assessments for the Cloisters Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District at a
public hearing to be held at the Regular City Council Meeting on June 27, 2017 in the Veteran's
Memorial Building, 209 Surf Street, Morro Bay, CA.
Section 3. The improvements to be maintained at the Cloisters Park and Open Space
are specified in the Engineer's Report dated May 1, 2017, which is hereby approved.
Section 4. The assessment upon assessable lots within the district is proposed to
total $148,944 or $1,241.20 per assessable parcel for Fiscal Year 2017/18.
Section 5. Staff is directed to continue a Major Maintenance Program that will address
items requiring significant expenditures in FY 2017/18.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Morro Bay at a regular meeting
held on this 9th day of May 2017 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN
Irons, Davis,
None
None
None
Headding, Makowetski, McPherson
L. I
ATTEST:
SWANSON, City Clerk
,M
EXHIBIT A
CLOISTERS
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
DISTRICT BOUNDARY DIAGRAM
The boundary diagrams for the District have previously been submitted to the City Clerk in the
format required under the 1972 Act and, by reference, are hereby made part of this Report. The
boundary diagrams are available for inspection at the office of the City Clerk during normal
business hours. The following diagram provides an overview of the District.
tx'
It
�htdt
tva
dYye
i
s
>f
FR i9H
t `1 19 V _
COO
Laz
s say —) TRACT 1996 : RU, 6k, 17, P9, "I
;�r�ERO �4, R.kr_ 8k. s . P9, as
CITY OF MORRO BAY
CLOISTERS
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
2017/2018 ENGINEER'S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT
May 1, 2017
AFFIDAVIT FOR 201 //2018 ENGINEER'SANNUAL LEVY REPORT
CITY OF MORRO BAY
CLOISTERS
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
This report describes the proposed maintenance, improvements, budgets, zone of benefit and
assessments to be levied on parcels of land within the Cloisters Landscapes and Lighting
Maintenance Assessment District for the fiscal year 2017/2018, as the same existed at the time of
the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the San Luis Obispo
County Assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within
the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City
Council and, to the best of my knowledge, information, belief, the report, the assessments and
diagrams have been prepared and computed in pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972.
Dated this9th day of _May_, 2017
Rob Livick, PE/PLS —Public Works Director/City Engineer
OQ�pFESSI�N�
�6 A. 41, F�G)
w C 61057 m
s� civic ��P
OF CA1-�F��
CITY OF MORRO BAY
CLOISTERS
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
\/ ► ► FaNKUM U
ENGINEER' S REPORT
Table of Contents
I. Overview............................................................................................................................... 1
A. Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1
B. Assessment History and Current Legislation.................................................................. 2
II. Description of the District..................................................................................................... 4
A. Improvements Authorized by the 1972 Act.................................................................... 4
B. Maintenance Items.......................................................................................................... 4
III. Method of Apportionment..................................................................................................... 6
A. General............................................................................................................................6
B. Benefit Analysis.............................................................................................................. 6
C. Maintenance Tasks.......................................................................................................... 7
D. Maintenance Costs.......................................................................................................... 7
E. Apportionment of Assessment........................................................................................ 8
Detailed Maintenance Tasks.................................................................. Attachment A
District Budget -Fiscal Year 2017/2018 ....................................................Attachment B
]/A "+
Table......................................................................Attachment C
District Boundary Diagram...................................................................Attachment D
I. Overview
A. Introduction
The City Council of the City of Morro Bay (hereafter referred to as "City"), County of all Luis
Obispo, State of California, previously formed and has levied and collected annual assessments
for the district designated as:
CLOISTERS LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
(hereafter referred to as "District") pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, commencing
with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the "1972 Act"), and in compliance with the provisions
of the California State Constitution Articles XIIIC and XIIID (hereafter referred to as the
"Constitution" or "Proposition 218").
This Report has been prepared in accordance with Chapter 1, Article 4 (commencing with Section
22565) of the 1972 Act and describes the District and changes to the District including: territories
annexed; modifications to the improvements or organization; and the proposed budgets and
assessments applicable for fiscal year 2017/2018.
Proiect History
Tract 1996, known as the Cloisters development, is a 124 lot subdivision bounded by State
Highway One at the east, Atascadero State Beach at the west, Morro Bay High School at the south,
and Azure, Coral, and San Jacinto Streets at the north (the "Cloisters").
The Cloisters, prior to development, was a privately owned 80 -plus acre expanse of open land.
The property was historically used for lateral and vertical access and contained a large area of
sensitive sand dunes abutting the eastern edge of Atascadero State Beach. Over the years, it was
the subject of various land development proposals including an RV park, a 390 -unit condominium
development, a 466 -unit single family residential development, a 455 -unit mixed residential
development, and a 213 -unit residential development. The City approved none of these
development proposals.
It was well known that any development at the Cloisters was going to require a balance between
continuation of lateral and vertical access within and through the property, while at the same time
conserving the sensitive plant and wildlife resources present. In addition, the negative impacts of
development on the site would have to be sufficiently offset by public resources and public
amenities from the site.
Zoning on most of the Cloisters site is Planned Development, Single -Family Residential with the
sand dunes and wetlands zoned Environmentally Sensitive Habitat (ESH). The purpose of the
Planned Development (PD) overlay zone is to provide for detailed and substantial analysis of
development on parcels, which because of location, size or public ownership, warrant special
review. This overlay zone is also intended to allow for the modification of, or exemption from, the
-1-
development standards of the primary zone which would otherwise apply if such action would
result in better design or other public benefit.
On September 23, 1996, the City Council passed Resolution No. 69-96, which accepted the final
map for Tract 1996, known as the Cloisters Subdivision, consisting of 124 lots. Lots 1 through 120
were for single-family residential purposes; Lots 121,122 and 1241 (dedicated for a fire station)
were offered to the City subject to the completion of the public improvements; and Lot 123 was
offered to the State.
The findings and conditions of approval for the project were numerous. For example, the City
Council made findings that the Cloisters project could cause significant environmental impacts
relating to land use, visual/aesthetics, affordable housing, traffic generation, air quality, noise,
geology, drainage and water quality, ecological resources, and public services; but that these
impacts could be mitigated by the recommended conditions. In addition, the City Council made
further findings that the Cloisters project was in compliance with the specific policies of the
General Plan/Local Coastal Plan (GP/LCP) and zoning ordinance with respect to protection of
views, environmentally sensitive resources, public access, circulation, hazards and other
requirements so long as the environmental impacts were mitigated. Finally, the City Council made
further findings that the Cloisters project complied with MBMC with respect to optional
subdivision design and related improvements, and that the optional design was justified in order
to contribute to a better community environment through the dedication of extensive public areas,
restoration of the ESH area, provision of scenic easements, and provision of larger than usual lots
adjacent to such areas, and maintenance of a consistent lot layout pattern adjacent to existing
development on the north side of Azure Street.
In order to mitigate the environmental impacts of the project and to provide a greater public benefit
as required in a PD overlay zone, the conditions of approval for the project required the applicant
to form an assessment district for the maintenance of the public park, bicycle pathway, right of
may landscaping, coastal access ways, ESH restoration areas and any other improved common
areas to be privately held or dedicated to the City. The public park area, as well as all open space
improvements and the assessment district were part of many detailed discussions during each City
and Coastal Commission hearing. Without this Condition of Approval and the creation of the
assessment district, the project would not have been approved and there would not be a Cloisters
Development.
B. Assessment History and Current Legislation
In November 1996, Californ
ia voters approved Proposition 218 that established specific
requirements for the ongoing imposition of taxes, assessments and fees. The provisions of the
Proposition are now contained in the California Constitutional Articles XIIIC and XIIID. All
assessments described in this Report and approved by the City Council are prepared in accordance
with the 1972 Act and in compliance with these provisions of the Constitution.
1 Lot 124 has been sold and is going through the entitlement process for development of several
single family homes, which will become part of the District.
-2-
Pursuant to the Article XIIID Section 5 of the Constitution, certain existing assessments were
exempt from the substantive and procedural requirements of the Article XIIID Section 4, and
property owner balloting is not required until such time that a new or increased assessment is
proposed. Specifically, the City determined that the annual assessments originally established for
the Cloisters were imposed in accordance with a consent and waiver as part of the original
development approval for the properties within these areas. As such, pursuant to Article XIIID
Section 5b, all the property owners approved the existing District assessments at the time the
assessments were created (originally imposed pursuant to a 100% landowner petition). Therefore,
the pre-existing assessments (the maximum assessment rates adopted prior to the passage of
Proposition 218) for this district is exempt from the procedural requirements Article XIIID Section
4. However, any new or increased assessment for the Cloisters shall comply with both the
substantive and procedural requirements of Article XIIID Section 4 before such assessments are
imposed.
The assessment district formation proceedings began in August 1996, and concluded with the final
public hearing on September 23, 1996 for formation of the District pursuant to the 1972 Act. This
formation led to the annual assessment levy of $148,944 (the "Assessment") for the maintenance
of the thirty-four (34) acres of public resource lands including open space and natural lands,
wetland area and pond used for drainage mitigation for homes constructed in Cloisters, median
landscaping, trees, a neighborhood park and recreation area, fencing and other public
improvements. The maximum assessment rates that existed and were adopted in fiscal year
1996/1997 did not include the assessment range formulae (inflationary adjustment) for their
maximum assessment rates and therefore will remain static unless the assessees vote to increase
the assessments. Refer to section III D — "Maintenance Costs" for an analysis of the decision to
not include an inflationary adjustment in the formulae.
In preparing the various purchase and sale documents for each individual lot, including the
Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions, the owners and developer were especially careful to call
out the existence of the assessment district and to make certain that the existence of assessment
district was disclosed to anyone who purchased one of these lots. In drafting all the project
documents, the City and the developer reinforced the special benefits for the residents of the
Cloisters Project from the public amenities and easements maintained by the assessment.
-3-
II. Description of the District
A. Improvements Authorized by the 1972 Act
As applicable or may be applicable to this proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements
to mean one or any combination of the following:
• the installation or planting of landscaping
• the installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and
facilities
• the installation or construction of public lighting facilities
• the installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the
foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof,
including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or
construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or
electrical facilities
• the maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing
• the acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.
Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
• the cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram,
and assessment
• the costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting and mailing of notices
• compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments
• compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services
• any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing
of the improvements
• any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.52
• costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.
The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "maintenance" to mean furnishing of services and materials
for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
• repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement
• providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation,
irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury
• the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste
• the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or
cover graffiti.
Be
Maintenance Items
The ongoing maintenance for the District, and the costs thereof, paid from the levy of the annual
assessments, are generally described below.
Replacement, maintenance and servicing of improvements include, but are not limited to, turf,
2 There is no existing bond debt nor is any anticipated at this time.
-4-
ground cover, shrubs, trees, other landscaping, irrigation systems, fencing, signage, trails,
walkways, recreation facilities, lighting, restroom facilities, parking and all necessary
appurtenances, and labor, materials, supplies, utilities and equipment. The public resources
maintained by the assessments from the District are further summarized as follows:
• Parkland: 4 Acres
® Open space meadow and natural land: 18.15 Acres
® Wetland: 5.5 Acres
® Medians and parkways within the public right -of --ways: 1.6 Acres
Within those areas, the following items are maintained through the levy of assessments:
1. Landscaping
a. Turf
b. Planted medians
c. Planter beds (formerly demonstration
garden)
d. Drainage systems, including gabion
channels
e. Irrigation system (spray and drip)
f.
i. 6' and 3' solid —Bike
Scrub/meadow plantings
g. Trees & shrubs along the sound wall
h. Willows
i. Wetland area plantings and pond
2. Hardscaping
a. Asphalt path system
b. Concrete walkways
c. Parking lot
d. Decomposed granite paths
e. Play area surfacing
f. Bridge on City owned property
-5-
3. Facilities and miscellaneous
a. Barbeques
b. Bike rack
c. Benches
d. Directional signs
e. Drinking fountains
f. Fences:
Path and
Fire Access Fencing
ii. Habitat Area (ESHA) fencing
and keep out signs
g. Interpretive panels
h. Light bollards
i. Monuments with lights
j. Observation pier at pond
k. Picnic tables
1. Play equipment and sand lot
m. Restroom
n. Sound wall
o. Trash cans
III. Method of Apportionment
A. General
This section of the Engineer's Report includes an explanation of the special benefits to be derived
from the installation, maintenance and servicing of the improvements and the methodology used
to apportion the total assessment to properties within the District.
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of
providing certain public improvements which include the construction, maintenance and servicing
of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost
of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be
apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount
among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be
received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
The proceeds from the District are used to fund the maintenance and upkeep of public resources
within the Cloisters development project for the special benefit of the properties located within the
project. The continued maintenance and upkeep of these important items is a distinct and special
benefit to properties within the District.
Easements were created and reserved in favor of each owner in the Cloisters Development for
new,
open space, scenic, passive recreation and coastal access across the entirety of Lots 121, 122
and 123; these lots shall not be developed with any improvements or structures unless necessary
and proper for the restoration and maintenance of the ESHA. This is another distinct and special
benefit conferred on property within the District.
S. Benefit Analysis
Each of the proposed improvements, the associated costs and assessments have been carefully
reviewedI identified and allocated based on special benefit pursuant to the provisions of the
Constitution and 1972 Act. The improvements associated with the District have been identified as
necessary, required and/or desired for the orderly development of the properties within the District
to their full potential, consistent with the proposed development plans and applicable portions of
the City GP/LCP as identified previously in this report. As such, these improvements would be
necessary and required of individual property owners for the development of such properties, and
the ongoing operation, servicing and maintenance of these improvements would be the financial
obligation of those properties. Therefore, the improvements and the annual costs of ensuring the
maintenance and operation of the improvements are of direct and special benefit to the properties.
The method of apportionment (method of assessment) is based on the premise that each assessed
parcel within the District receives special benefit from various improvements provided by the
District. The desirability and security of properties is enhanced by the presence of local
improvements in close proximity to those properties. The special benefits associated with
-6-
landscaped improvements are specifically:
® enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements
® improved aesthetic appeal of properties providing a positive representation of the area
® enhanced adaptation of the urban environment within the natural environment from
adequate green space and landscaping.
C. Maintenance Tasks
A list of maintenance tasks required to maintain the District in acceptable condition for public use
was developed based on maintenance standards established for existing parks within the City and
is included in this report as Attachment A. The list has since been divided into Janitorial and
Landscaping Maintenance Tasks, with an additional section for Deferred Maintenance
Tasks/Capital Replacement Projects.
It is clear, as illustrated in the next section, the purchasing power of the assessments has severely
eroded over the last twenty-one years as have the level of maintenance activities.
D. Maintenance Costs
The estimated annual cost of maintaining the District was originally developed by the Recreation
and Parks Department based on the tasks required and the City's Flat Rate Manual for Parks
Maintenance. District costs include labor, utilities, insurance, engineering services and
depreciation/reserves. The annual cost of maintenance, including any reserves, for the 2017/18
fiscal year is estimated to be $148,944. The cost estimate is included in this report as Attachment
B. This estimate reflects a major reduction in maintenance services when compared to the initial
resources that were allocated to the District due to increased costs to provide services.
The Cloisters Assessment District was first incorporated into the City's Annual operating budget
in FY 99/00 (CPI=166.2). A comparison between the spending in the first budget year versus
present day (CPI=243.801) is depicted in the table below. The analysis shows that while the costs
to maintain relatively new park and other facilities in FY99/00 (inflated to today's dollars) results
in a funding differential of nearly $72,000.
Item
FY 00-99
FY 99/00
FY 17-18
Difference
Cost
Inflated to
Budget
between
Current Day
Inflated and
FY17/18
Budget
Personnel
Services
76,285
112,901
51,748
<61,153>
Supplies
14,859
$21,991
7,000
<14,991>
Services
50,800
$75,184
66,300
<8,885>
Capital/Reserve
7,000
103360
23,896
+13,536
Total
1489944
2209526
1489944
<719582>
-7-
E. Apportionment of Assessment
The total assessment for the District is apportioned equally to each of the one hundred and twenty
residential lots. Lots 121 and 122 (Parcel 1) Cloisters Park and Open Space, Lot 124 (dedicated
for a fire station, declared as surplus by the City and sold - currently vacant, but new owner is
going through the entitlement process to develop several single-family homes) and Lot 123 (now
Parcel 2) offered to the State are not assessed. Individual assessments are listed in the table shown
in Attachment C.
-8-
Attachment A
CLOISTERS
WON
DETAILED MAINTENANCE TASKS
Task
Weekly
Twice
Weekly
Monthly
Twice
Annually
Annually
As
Needed
I Turf Maintenance
Mow
XX
Edge/Trim
XX
Fertilize
XX
XX
Aerate/Seed
XX
XX
II Other Landscape Maint.
Prune plants/shrubbery
XX
XX
Maintain weed free
XX
Maintain bark mulch
XX
Rake/distribute gravel/sand
XX
XX
Fertilize
XX
III Tree Maintenance
Prune trees
XX
Maintain tree supports
XX
Remove dead trees
XX
IV Irrigation
Maintain/repair irrigation
system
XX
Program/check controllers
XX
XX
Hand water as required
XX
Monitor water usage
XX
V Weed control
Mow open areas
XX
XX
Remove noxious weeds
XX
Weed identified areas
XX
XX
VI Wetlands
Coordinate maint. with city
XX
VII Paths,walkways, parking
lot maintenance
Conduct general safety
inspection
XX
XX
Remove foreign objects
XX
Trim/spray pathways
XX
A-1
CLOISTERS
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
DETAILED MAINTENANCE TASKS (cont.)
Task
Weekly
Twice
Weekly
Monthly
Twice
Annually
Annually
As
Needed
VII iPaths, walkways, parking
lot maintenance (cont.
Inspect hardscape for
damage
XX
XX
Remove dog litter
XX
VIII' Pest%Disease Control
Control pests/rodents and
plant diseases
XX
IX Litter/trash control
Litter pick up throughout
XX
Remove trash from
garbage cans
XX
Empty ashes from bbq's
XX
X Restroom
Clean/sanitize/service
Daily
W
Maintain roof
XX
Maintain plumbing
XX
Paint structure
XX
A-2
Attachment B
CLOISTERS
DISTRICT BUDGET -FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018
NAME: Cloisters Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
DIAGRAM: Attached, as Attachment D
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS: On file in the Office of the City Engineer.
ESTIMATED COST OF MAINTENANCE: The table on the following page outlines the
estimated budget for the maintenance of the District for fiscal year 2017/18. It also provides a
look back at the three previous fiscal years including the current year with expenses as of
March 31, 2016.
CONTRACT SERVICES
Includes all daily and routine tasks as well as non -routine maintenance and repair costs.
PERSONNEL SERVICES
Includes contract supervision of daily and routine tasks as well as non -routine maintenance and
repair costs.
SUPPLIES
Includes all supplies used in daily tasks as well as non -routine repair and maintenance.
SERVICES
Includes utilities, outside engineering, insurance and contract services.
CAPITAL/DEFERRED MAINTENANCE RESERVE
Accumulated funds to be directed at capital projects, permits, and other one-time expenses (as
described in Attachment A).
TOTAL ASSESSMENT:
PER PARCEL YEARLY ASSESSMENT ($148,944/120 parcels)
OPERATING FUND CASH BALANCE (1 May 2017)
ACCUMULATION FUND BALANCE (30 June 2016)
$148944
,
$ 1,241.20
$68,957.85
$88,136.14
6
O
P
Kt
P
w
C!
n
1�
O
G
v*
m
Mt
6
O
P
Kt
P
w
C!
n
1�
O
G
v*
N
Mt
o3
6
O
P
Kt
P
w
C!
n
1�
O;
VMf
v*
N
Mt
o3
PR
N
rT
M-
�
M
�
Ue
M1"t
i J
w
N
6
O
P
Kt
P
C?
M
�
VMf
v*
N
Mt
o3
PR
N
rT
M-
�
M
6
O
P
Kt
0O
g
M
�
VMf
v*
N
M
h
PR
N
rT
�
M
�
Ue
M'
i J
6
O
P
Kt
0O
g
tM1
�
VMf
v*
N
M
h
PR
N
rT
�
M
�
itMz
M'
i J
N
W
:
r-rM..
b
Q
N
V1'.
.rvin
:.
r�'u
6
O
P
Kt
0O
g
tM1
�
VMf
v*
§R
u'1
N
K
N
B'^
IIII
M
g
tM1
�
VMf
v*
B'^
IIII
g
�
§R
h
M
F=
�
M
B'^
IIII
g
�
F=
�
N
W
:
M
b
Q
N
c9
.rvin
r�'u
4+
M
�
ami
C4755
5
+�
B'^
IIII
g
�
F=
�
N
W
:
M
b
N
c9
ami
B'^
IIII
g
�
F=
�
5
+�
p
w�
a
Attachment C
CLOISTERS
PARCEL/ASSESSMENT TABLE
Lot Number
County Assessor's
Parcel Number
Annual
Assessment
1
065-387-001
$1,241.20
2
065-387-002
$1,241.20
3
065-387-003
$1,241.20
4
065-387-004
$1,241.20
5
065-387-005
$11241.20
6
065-387-006
$1,241.20
7
065-387-007
$1,241.20
8
065-387-008
$1124120
9
065-387-009
$1,241.20
10
065-387-010
$1,241.20
11
065-387-011
$1,241.20
12
065-387-012
$1,241.20
13
065-387-013
$1,241.20
14
065-387-014
$11241.20
15
065-387-015
$1,241.20
16
065-387-016
$1,241.20
17
065-387-017
$1,24120
18
065-387-018
$1124120
19
065-387-019
$1,24120
C-1
Lot Number
County Assessor's
Parcel Number
Annual Assessment
20
065-387-053
$1,241.20
21
065-387-054
$1,241.20
22
065-387-055
$1,241.20
23
065-387-023
$1,241.20
24
065-387-024
$1,241.20
25
065-387-025
$1,241.20
26
065-387-026
$1,241.20
27
065-387-027
$1,241.20
28
065-387-028
$1,241.20
29
065-387-029
$1,241.20
30
065-387-030
$11241.20
31
065-387-031
$1,241.20
32
065-387-032
$1,241.20
33
065-387-033
$1,241.20
34
065-387-034
$1,241.20
35
065-387-035
$1,241.20
36
065-387-036
$1,241.20
37
065-387-037
$1,241.20
38
065-387-038
$1,241.20
39
065-387-039
$1,241.20
40
065-387-040
$1,241.20
41
065-387-041
$1,241.20
42
065-387-042
$1,241.20
43
065-387-043
$1,241.20
C-2
Lot Number
County Assessor's
Parcel Number
Annual
Assessment
44
065-387-044
$1,241.20
45
065-387-045
$1,241.20
46
065-388-001
$1,241.20
47
065-388-002
$1,241.20
48
065-388-003
$1,241.20
49
065-388-004
$1,241.20
50
065-388-005
$1,241.20
51
065-388-006
$1,241.20
52
065-388-007
$1,241.20
53
065-388-008
$1,241.20
54
065-388-009
$1,241.20
55
065-388-010
$1,241.20
56
065-388-011
$1,241.20
57
065-388-012
$1,241.20
58
065-388-013
$1,241.20
59
065-388-014
$1,241.20
60
065-388-015
$1,241.20
61
065-388-016
$1,241.20
62
065-388-017
$1,241.20
63
065-388-018
$1,241.20
64
065-388-019
$1,241.20
65
065-388-020
$1,241.20
66
065-388-021
$1,241.20
67
065-388-022
$1,241.20
C-3
Lot Number
County Assessor's
Parcel Number
Annual
Assessment
68
065-388-023
$1,241.20
69
065-388-024
$1,241.20
70
065-388-025
$1,241.20
71
065-388-026
$1,241.20
72
065-388-027
$1,241.20
73
065-388-028
$1,241.20
74
065-388-029
$1,241.20
75
065-388-030
$1,241.20
76
065-388-031
$1,241.20
77
065-388-032
$13241.20
78
065-388-033
$1,241.20
79
065-388-034
$1,241.20
80
065-388-035
$1,241.20
81
065-388-036
$1,241.20
82
065-388-037
$1,241.20
83
065-388-038
$1,241.20
84
065-388-039
$1,241.20
85
065-388-040
$1,241.20
86
065-388-041
$1,241.20
87
065-388-042
$1,241.20
88
065-388-043
$1,241.20
89
065-388-044
$1,241.20
90
065-388-045
$1,241.20
91
065-388-046
$1,241.20
C-4
Lot Number
County Assessor's
Parcel Number
Annual Assessment
92
065-388-047
$1,241.20
93
065-388-048
$1,241.20
94
065-388-049
$1,241.20
95
065-388-050
$1,241.20
96
065-388-051
$15241.20
97
065-388-052
$1,241.20
98
065-388-053
$1,241.20
99
065-388-054
$1,241.20
100
065-388-055
$1,241.20
101
065-388-056
$1,241.20
102
065-388-057
$15241.20
103
065-388-058
$1,241.20
104
065-388-059
$1,241.20
105
065-388-060
$1,241.20
106
065-388-061
$1,241.20
107
065-388-062
$1,241.20
108
065-388-063
$1,241.20
109
065-388-064
$1,241.20
110
065-388-065
$1,241.20
111
065-388-066
$1,241.20
112
065-388-067
$1,241.20
113
065-388-068
$1,241.20
114
065-388-069
$1,241.20
115
065-388-070
$1,241.20
C-5
County Assessor's
Lot Number
Parcel
Number
Annual
Assessment
116
065-388-071
$11241.20
117
065-38&072
$1,241.20
118
065-388-073
$1,241.20
119
065-388-074
$1,241.20
120
065-388-075
$1,241.20
121
065-386-005
0
122 (Parcel 1)
065-386-016
0
123 (Parcel 2)
065-386-017
0
065-386-018
065-386-019
065-386-012
065-386-013
065-386-014
065-386-010
124
065-386-015
0
Attachment D
CLOISTERS
��►i I7Y�k��►Cl1: ►�f 1711 Cly: Y Y 1►C1�
IT/_�I�Y Y �1�%�►[il�/_�.Y.�f.Y ►y li�►`1r71 I�f.- ; [
DISTRICT BOUNDARY DIAGRAM
The boundary diagrams for the District have previously been submitted to the City Clerk in the
format required under the 1972 Act and, by reference, are hereby made part of this Report. The
boundary diagrams are available for inspection at the office of the City Clerk during normal
business hours. The following diagram provides an overview of the District.
f
IVA
yX/ � �fL Y f. ^•As^
Fry;" &Y�FC, � Pjyf
2`$yy
sr
f
FRI 19H
by j]!
J
✓ 'isS ♦a r§ F'9£KARLB FSG
TR 1Gi
7 998:
R.dt.
Bk. t 7.
Fy.
83.
h7,4y�aUEitO
B�tCti.
R.�.
$k. 7
Pg.
75
D-1
Y
FFI
pf' AtUf#'t0 4Y
.k88