Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC_1984-02-27 Regular Meeting MinutesREGULAR MEETING - FEBRUARY 27, 1984 RECREATION HALL - 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Horace Strong INVOCATION - Rev.. Charles Erickson, St. Peter's Episcopal Church A. PUBLIC HEARINGS, REPORTS AND APPEARANCES A-1 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION TO PROHIBIT PARKING ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF QUINTANA WEST OF KINGS AND CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO REDUCE THE SPEED LIMIT ON QUINTANA FROM MORRO BAY BLVD. TO LA LOMA A CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH CRITERION AND DEFINITION FOR 'INFILL" DEVELOPMENT A-3 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO ABANDON AND SELL HEMLOCK S TREET MINI -PARK B. UNFINISHED BUSINESS B-1 Resolution approving Fisher Project with conditions, and certifying t he project EIR C. NEW BUSINESS C-1 Correspondence regarding Youth Services Program/Officer Joe Reagan C-2 Consideration of Council policy regarding AB159 (Harbors and N avigation Code, Article 4, Section 773-774 4) C-3 Consideration. of Assignment of Lease Site 74 and 74W (Kirth) to Morro Bay Marina, Inc. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D-1 City Council minutes of February 14, 1984 D-2 Resolution in support of a constitutional amendment for local control of Land Use Issues D-3 Labor Relations Consultant Contract Renewal D-4 Declaration of Surplus City Property D-5 Resolution of support for AB 2099 (Farr) regarding funding for parks and recreationgrants for local agencies D-6 Resolution proclaiming March 1, 1984, as the beginning of a new Crimestoppers Year E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION E-1 City Council E-2 City Administrator E-3 City Attorney MORRO BAY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING - FEBRUARY 27, 1984 RECREATION HALL - 7:30 P.M. A Na Act#On. Mayor Shelton called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL P RESENT: STAFF: Eugene R. Shelton Rodger Anderson John Lemons Bruce Risley Bud Zeuschner P aul Baxter Mike LeSage Dave Howell Gary Napper. N ick Nichols Mike Multari S teve Wolter P eggy Buchanan Mayor Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember. City Administrator City Attorney P olice Chief Asst. to City Administrator P ublic Works Director Acting Commun. Dev. Dir. Recreation Director. Deputy City Clerk The Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation was provided by Horace S trong. A. PUBLIC HEARINGS, REPORTS AND APPEARANCES A-1 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION TO PROHIBIT PARKING ON THE SOUTH S IDE OF QUINTANA WEST OF KINGS AND CONSIDERATION OF AN O RDINANCE TO REDUCE THE SPEED LIMIT ON QUINTANA FROM MORRO BAY BLVD. TO LA LOMA Mr. Nichols reviewed the staff report and noted that this item h ad been continued from the previous Council meeting to allow for a legally noticed public hearing on the proposed Ordinance to ✓ educe the speed limit. Mr. Nichols reviewed the staff ✓ ecommendations regarding Quintana Road, and stated that as a ✓ esult of a sight -distance study, staff is recommending that a portion of Quintana, west of Kings be marked to prohibit parking. Mr. Nichols also stated that staff was recommending that the speed limit on Quintana from Morro Bay Blvd. to La Loma be ✓ educed from 35 mph to 30 mph. Mr. Nichols stated that the Resolution and Ordinance had been reviewed by Mr. LeSage and several minor corrections had been made. Mayor Shelton opened the hearing to the public for comments or q uestions. 1 MORRO BAY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING - FEBRUARY 27, 1984 P AGE TWO Bob Pilcher stated that as a property owner in the area in q uestion, he was in favor of the reduced speed limit and the parking restriction as proposed. Mr. Truitt objected to the proposed no parking area and stated t hat this would adversely affect his business. Mr. Truitt had no objection to the reduced speed along Quintana. Mayor Shelton asked what effects the red zone would have as far as mail delivery and such. Mr. Nichols stated that the red curb would prohibit parking or standing of vehicles only, and would not affect mail delivery. William Manley thanked staff for their efforts as a result of his initial request regarding traffic safety on Quintana, and q uestioned whether Cal Trans had been contacted regarding potential improvements at the intersection of the Hwy. 1 offramp and Quintana and Morro Bay Blvd. Mr. Nichols stated that this was a separate issue, and Cal Trans would be contacted at a later. date. Joe Carbajal stated his opposition to the no parking area and felt that it would cause those cars to use his parking area and would not leave room for his customers. MOTION: Councilmember Anderson moved that the Public Hearing be closed. The motion was seconded by Councilmember. Zeuschner and carried unanimously. (5-0) Councilmember Anderson felt that the recommendation of staff was t he best solution to the traffic problem in that area, and would conform to the results of the sight -distance study. MOTION: Councilmember Risley moved to adopt the Resolution to prohibit parking along the south side of Quintana west of Kings street, as amended by Mr. LeSage. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Lemons and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Risley, Lemons, Anderson, Zeuschner, Shelton NOES: None ABSENT: None 2 MORRO BAY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING - FEBRUARY 27, 1984 PAGE THREE MOTION: Councilmember Zeuschner moved that the Ordinance to ✓ educe the speed limit on Quintana from Morro Bay Blvd. to La Loma be read by title and number only. The motion was seconded by Councilmember. Risley and carried u nanimously. (5-0) Mr. Baxter read the Ordinance by title and number only. MOTION: Councilmember Zeuschner moved that the Ordinance be adopted for a first reading. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Risley and carried by the following ✓ oll call vote: AYES: Zeuschner, Risley, Anderson, Lemons, Shelton NOES: None ABSENT: None A-2 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH CRITERION AND DEFINITION FOR "INFILL" DEVELOPMENT Mr. Multari reviewed Council's previous actions regarding the definition of infill development, and provided a brief summary of the issue. Mr. Multari reviewed the City's historical definition and use of infill, and the Land Use Plan policies relating to this subject as well. Mr. Multari stated that three draft ✓ esolutions had been prepared for Council's consideration and n oted that two basic issues were at hand. The first being Council's direction regarding the definition of infill and the second being the use of infill as a criteron to establish e ligibility for water allocation. Mayor Shelton opened the hearing to the public. Bob Lane suggested the criteria to be used in determining infill should be the size of the project, and suggested that large projects not be allowed to develop and that only owner -builder or small speculators be allocated water. Mr. Multari noted that under the current allocation system, single family owner occupants have the highest priority, with o ther single family homes a second highest priority. Councilmember. Lemons questioned the number of permits issued and the number pending. 3 MORRO BAY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING - FEBRUARY 27, 1984 PAGE FOUR Mr. Multari stated that he did not have the figures available, however he noted that this quarter would be the first time the City has been unable to meet all the single family applications. Councilrnember Risley questioned the City's policy of allowing multi -family unit allocations in other quarters besides the 4th. Mr. Multari explained the department's interpretation of this policy, and noted that it was not clearly spelled out that allocations could not take place. P eter. Diffley spoke regarding this issue and noted that a letter from the Coastal Commission staff had clearly indicated that allocations for multi -family dwellings should only be made during the fourth quarter.. Ray Gallo stated that the issue is equal treatment of property owners, and felt that any restrictions imposed by the City which w ould prevent any property owner from an equal chance at water allocations would be illegal. Mr. Gallo stated that establishing a priority is fine, but to restrict certain property from even applying would not be legal. Ray Kaltenback felt that the main question should be whether there is enough water to allow large developments, and he indicated that he did not feel there was. Howard Gaines felt that the retired property owners in Morro Bay had a vested right to develop, whereas speculators did not. Vic Montgomery felt that equal treatment of property owners should be maintained and that since all property owners pay property taxes, they should all be entitled to apply for water allocation. S teve Sweetwood felt that the VRM project had been treated fairly by the City and felt that threats of legal action shouldn t change Council's actions. Bob Lane felt that the character of Morro Bay should be preserved and large projects should not be allowed. Ray Gallo noted that as part of a Planned Development, the d eveloper often has to show the development of the entire area at o nce rather than in phases. Mr. Gallo noted that the first phase o f VRM was only 38 units. Dick Fisher requested clarification of the definition of 'subdivision" and felt that it can mean different things. 4 MORRO BAY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING - FEBRUARY 27, 1984 PAGE FIVE Terry Brigges questioned the Coastal Commission's direction ✓ egarding the issuance of water for new subdivisions only in the fourth quarter. MOTION: Councilmember. Zeuschner moved that the Public Hearing be closed. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Anderson and carried unanimously. (5-0) Councilmember Zeuschner felt that the definition of infill should ✓ estrict and limit growth and pointed out that Council has taken action towards this by their adoption of the LUP and water allocation model. Councilmember Zeuschner felt that the term "subdivision" did need clarification and reminded the audience that this discussion was not a hearing on VRM or any other project, but rather a discussion on infill itself. Councilmember. Anderson felt that all property owners should be allowed to have the right to use their property and to apply and compete for water. equivalencies. Councilmember Anderson noted that he felt a priority system was perfectly reasonable, and would not discriminate. Councilmember Lemons stated that the Council should recall that the allocations had been reduced due to lack of funding for a ✓ epair program and felt that the Department of Water Resources suggestions for implementing the Water Management Plan should be ✓ eviewed. Mayor Shelton stated that he favored draft Resolution A and C and suggested that the City's water is a finite resource as a ✓ esult of the leaky pipe water program. MOTION: Councilmember Risley moved that Council adopt Resolution A as submitted. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Zeuschner. Councilmember. Lemons felt that the end result of this Resolution would be to prohibit certain property owners from water allocations. Councilmember Anderson felt that priority should be granted to the small lot owner, however the ability to apply should not be taken away completely from any owner. There was a discussion of the language and effect of Resolution A. 5 MORRO BAY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING - FEBRUARY 27, 1984 PAGE SIX MOTION: Councilmember Lemons moved that the motion to adopt Resolution A be tabled until consideration of a definition of infill was reviewed. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Anderson, and carried by the following vote: MOTION: MOTION: MOTION: MOTION: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: L emons, Anderson, Zeuschner Risley, Shelton N one Councilmember Risley moved to adopt Resolution C as submitted. Councilmember. Zeuschner made an alternate motion to consider each item within Resolution C separately. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Risley and carried unanimously. Councilmember Zeuschner moved that Exhibit A, item (1) be approved as submitted in the staff report. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Risley and carried u nanimously. (5-0) Councilmember Zeuschner moved that Exhibit A, item (2) be approved as submitted in the staff report. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Risley and carried unanimously. (5-0) MOTION: Councilmember Zeuschner moved that Exhibit A, item (3) be approved as submitted in the staff report. The motion was seconded by Councilmember. Risley and carried u nanimously. (5-0) MOTION: Councilmember Zeuschner moved that Exhibit A, item (4) be referred back to staff for further information. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Risley and carried u nanimously. (5-0) Council then discussed Exhibit A item 5, and felt that it should be referred back to staff for additional input. MOTION: Councilmember Zeuschner moved that Exhibit A, item be referred back to staff for further information. motion was seconded by Councilmember Risley carried unanimously. (5-0) (5) The and Councilmember. Risley suggested an amendment to item 6, and it was discussed and further amended by Council to read as follows: 6 MORRO BAY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING - FEBRUARY 27, 1984 P AGE SEVEN (6) When a water management program is approved and implemented and/or additional water sources are available, the criteria for infill will be reconsidered. MOTION: Councilmember Risley moved that Exhibit A, item (6) be approved as amended. The motion was seconded by Mayor Shelton and carried by the following vote: AYES: Risley, Shelton, Anderson, Lemons, Zeuschner NOES: None ABSENT: None There was additional discussion about the adoption of Resolution C as approved and amended. MOTION: Councilmember. Risley moved to table Resolution C until additional information is presented at the next meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilmember. Zeuschner and carried unanimously. (5-0) Council recessed briefly at 10:17 p.m. and reconvened at 10:25 p.m. A-3 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO ABANDON AND SELL HEMLOCK STREET MINI -PARK S teve Wolter reviewed the staff report and noted that this was a legally noticed public hearing for the purpose of consideration of abandonment of Hemlock Mini -Park. Mr. Wolter reviewed the legal requirements of park abandonment, and stated that the P lanning Commission had reviewed the matter and was recommending in favor of the sale. Mayor Shelton opened the Public Hearing. S cotty Campbell questioned whether he would be able to purchase t he property, as his property adjoined the park and he would like t o prevent construction. Jim Hartzell, Recreation Commission, stated that the Commission h ad felt that the site was not being used as a park, and funds from the sale of the site could be used to make additional improvements at other park sites. Jane VonKeogh stated that the neighborhood children use the property to play on and as a right-of-way. Joan Silva requested that the abandonment and sale be approved, and that any funds received be used for improvement of Coleman park. 7 MORRO BAY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING - FEBRUARY 27, 1984 P AGE EIGHT MOTION: Councilmember Anderson moved that the Public Hearing be closed. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Lemons and carried unanimously. (5-0) Council discussed the different bidding procedures that might allow Mr. Campbell to bid on or purchase the property. Mr. LeSage stated that normal bidding procedures should be followed, with a minimum bid amount set, and that verbal bids could be received after the bid opening. Mr. LeSage noted that t he City should reserve the right to reject all bids. There was discussion regarding the allowable uses on the site, and Mr. Multari noted that any legally subdivided lot is buildable. Mayor Shelton felt that the question of use of the proceeds from t his sale should not be decided until budget hearings. Mr. LeSage suggested that the Resolution be amended, and provided additional language regarding bidding procedures. MOTION: Councilmember Zeuschner moved that Council adopt the Resolution be adopted as amended. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Risley and carried unanimously. (5-0) B. UNFINISHED BUSINESS B-1 RESOLUTION APPROVING FISHER PROJECT WITH CONDITIONS, AND CERTIFYING THE PROJECT EIR Mr. Baxter stated that this Resolution had been prepared according to Council's earlier direction, approving with conditions the Fisher Project and certifying the project EIR. MOTION: Councilmember Risley moved that the Resolution be adopted as submitted. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Anderson and carried unanimously. (5-0) Councilmember Risley stated that in his opinion this project should have been required to have a full EIR after the first review, and noted that an appeal should not have been necessary to insure the full protection of the citizesn. Councilmember Risley felt that EIR's should be required on all projects this size. 8 MORRO BAY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING - FEBRUARY 27, 1984 P AGE NINE C. NEW BUSINESS C-1 CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING YOUTH SERVICES PROGRAM/OFFICE JOE REAGAN Mayor Shelton stated that the City had received a request from a group of citizens to hold a public hearing regarding their concerns over, the status of Officer. Joe and the Youth Services P rogram. Mayor Shelton informed the audience that this item had been scheduled as New Business, to allow Council to review the testimony presented and determine if there was a need for a public hearing or additional testimony. Mr. Baxter stated that correspondence from Jim Rodgers had also been included in the packet. Ann Domenghini, a preschool teacher, stated her concern for the children in the community and felt that the City should give her straight answers about the removal of Officer Joe from the Youth S ervices Program. Ms. Domenghini stated that she had signatures from over 1,000 voters who would like to have a public hearing on this issue. Jim Rodgers felt that a public hearing should be granted, and spoke regarding his opinion that Officer Joe should be retained in his current position. Mayor Shelton suggested that staff provide some response to these concerns. Dave Martin, Morro Bay High School principal, felt that the Youth Services Program is good for the kids, and Officer Joe has the t rust and confidence of the students. Mr. Martin felt that the issue was having a good, qualified person in that position, whether it was Officer Joe or someone else, and noted that the person should be trained and experienced in the counseling of youths. Chief Dave Howell reviewed his rationale for. rotating Officer. Joe from the Youth Services Program. Chief Howell stated that this was previous Department policy, to allow other officers the opportunity to work with the program and the kids. Chief Howell stressed that the Department is not losing Officer Reagan s skills, and that Officer Joe would be utilized in the training of t he new Youth Services Officer and would also be available for any citizen or youth who requested his services. Councilmember Risley noted that due to budget cutbacks, the Department has not been able to fill all of its personnel needs. 9 MORRO BAY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING - FEBRUARY 27, 1984 P AGE TEN Howard Gaines agreed that the City has had severe cutbacks and the Departments have not had the resources to hire new employees. Mayor Shelton asked if there would be a savings by this rotation. Chief Howell stated that it was more or less a trade off and was n ot being done for the purpose of saving money. Chief Howell expressed however, that the Department had e xperienced an increase in the number of calls for service, and t his had impacted the Department in terms of personnel. Chief Howell noted that overall crime was down as well as juvenile crime. Ann Domenghini stated that the community deserved to have a q ualified person in the Youth Services Officer position and felt t hat Officer Joe should remain in this capacity. Mrs. Stron felt that children would not be able to relate to a "rotating" officer. Chief Howell stated that the rotation would only be done every t wo to three years, and not every few months. M'May Diffley felt that perhaps the Youth Services Officer should n ot be a sworn police officer, and that if the position were a civilian position, perhaps another police officer could be hired. Mrs. Loretta Trinchera spoke regarding her family's experiences w ith Officer Joe, and praised his abilities and concern for the children. Jane VonKeogh felt that Officer Joe should not be removed from h is position until another officer had been adequately trained. Mr. Baxter felt that until the attempt was made to train an additional officer, and place him in the Youth Officer position, t here would be no way to tell the effect on the community. Mr. Baxter noted that if Officer Joe were to leave the Department, t here would be no backup officer to replace him, and stressed the n eed to have additional officers trained. Chief Howell stated that it was not his intent to jeopardize the P rogram in any way, and that Officer Joe would be available to assist in the training of new officers, and well as to the community as a whole. 10 MORRO BAY CITY COUNCI REGULAR MEETING - PEB1.JARY 27, 1984 PAGE ELEVEN Councilmember. Anderson felt that there would always be some officers who had a better raport with the kids, however he felt that the City should utilize Officer Reagan s talents in training and assisting other officers to work in the program as well. Councilmember Lemons suggested that the group of citizens who w ere in attendance at this meeting meet with Chief Howell to ✓ eview his plans for. the Program, for Officer Joe, and for training of additional officers, and if after that meeting there w as still question or dissatisfaction, then a Public Hearing could be held. Councilmember Risley noted that no person is "indispensible" and the Youth Services Officer can and perhaps should be replaced periodically. Councilmember Zeuschner stated that it was an Administrative decision and the City Council should back up the decision until it can be shown that it was not a correct decision. Council continued the discussion and agreed that a committee of citizens should meet with Chief Howell to discuss their concerns. C-2 CONSIDERATION OF COUNCIL POLICY REGARDING AB159 (HARBORS AND NAVIGATION CODE, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 773-774.4) Mr. Baxter stated that with the implementation of AB159 the City n eeds to redefine its policy concerning monitoring and control of ✓ essels in the harbor. Mr. Baxter stated that staff is ✓ ecommending that Council ratify the Harbor Patrol's present o perating policy to advise vessels of conditions in the harbor e ntrance and to make broad recommendations based on their. e xperience. Mr. Baxter noted that this is done only during the City's normal working hours, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Mr. LeSage questioned whether this policy includes the right to prevent entrance or exit to the harbor. Mr. Baxter stated that it did not, it was merely a policy to ✓ ecommend and advise vessels based on conditions in the harbor e ntrance. MOTION: Councilmember Zeuschner moved that Council ratify the Harbor Patrol's existing operating policy regarding recommendations and advise to vessels entering or exiting the harbor entrance. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Risley and carried unanimously. (5-0) 11 MORRO BAY CITY COUNCI REGULAR MEETING - FEB.z1RY 27, 1984 P AGE TWELVE C-3 CONSIDERATION OF ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE SITES 74 AND 74W (KIRTH) TO MORRO BAY MARINA, INC. Mr. Baxter stated that an application for assignment of Lease Sites 74 and 74W (Kirth) to Morro Bay Marina, Inc., had been received and reviewed and staff was recommending approval of the assignment subject to several conditions. Mr. Baxter noted that the lessees were current with their financial obligations, and had a good financial record with a satisfactory report during the last audit. Mr. Baxter stated t hat there were several maintenance items that had not been completed, and these would be included as a condition of approval of the assignment. Mr. Baxter also noted that an increase in the percentage rental for slips would also be a condition of approval, as well as the requirement for submittal of Articles of Incorporation and other financial documents. Mr. Stan Trapp, a partner in Morro Bay Marina, Inc. stated that these conditions were satisfactory to them, and if there were any q uestions, he would be happy to answer them. Councilmember Risley questioned who was involved in Morro Bay Marina, Inc. Mr. Baxter stated that the group was a current lessee of the City, consisting of Mr. Trapp, Mr. Waterman and Mr. Appling. MOTION: Councilmember Zeuschner moved that the Council approve the assignment of Lease Sites 74 and 74W from Kirth to Morro Bay Marina subject to the conditions as stated in the staff report, and that the Resolution be adopted as submitted. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Risley and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Zeuschner, Risley, Lemons, Shelton NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Anderson D. CONSENT CALENDAR D-1 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 14, 1984 REGULAR MEETING Mr. Baxter recommended approval of the minutes as submitted. 12 MORRO BAY CITY COUNCI' REGULAR MEETING - FEBx.jARY 27, 1984 PAGE THIRTEEN D-2 RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT FOR LOCAL CONTROL OF LAND USE ISSUES Mr. Baxter recommended that Council approve the Resolution as submitted. D-3 LABOR RELATIONS CONSULTANT CONTRACT RENEWAL Mr. Baxter recommended that Council approve the contract for Becker. and Bell for labor relations and authorize the Mayor to sign on behalf of the City. D-4 DECLARATION OF SURPLUS CITY PROPERTY Mr. Baxter recommended that Council declare the attached inventory as surplus to city needs and authorize disposal by auction. D-5 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR AB2099 (FARR) REGARDING FUNDING Vin n FOR PARKS AND RECREATION GRANTS FOR LOCAL AGENCIES oRDI-g Mr. Baxter recommended that the Council approve the Resolution as submitted. D-6 RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING MARCH 1, 1984, AS THE BEGINNING OF A NEW CRIMESTOPPERS YEAR Mr. Baxter recommended that the Council approve the Resolution as submitted. D-7 DENIAL OF CLAIM OF MARY L. HAUPERT Mr. Baxter recommended that Council deny the claim of Mary L. Haupert as submitted. MOTION: Councilmember Zeuschner moved that the Consent Calendar be approved as submitted. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Lemons and carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Zeuschner, Lemons, Anderson, Risley, Shelton None None E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 13 MORRO BAY CITY COUNCI' REGULAR MEETING - FEB._JARY 27, 1984 P AGE FOURTEEN E-1 CITY COUNCIL Councilmember Lemons stated that he was still concerned about the 54th street problem with trash dumping, and requested an update from staff regarding correction of the problem. Councilmember Anderson asked to be excused from the next regular meeting as he would be out-of-town. Council agreed that Councilmember Anderson would be excused. E-2 CITY ADMINISTRATOR Mr. Baxter requested that Council consider a date for the suggested study session regarding water. Council discussed several dates, and agreed that Friday, March 30th, at a time to be set later, would be a convenient date for all. Mr. Baxter stated that he would contact those people from out-of-town and notify Council as to the time for the meeting. Mr. Baxter requested a closed session. E-3 CITY ATTORNEY N one. MOTION: Councilmember Zeuschner moved that the meeting be adjourned to Closed Session. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Lemons and carried unanimously. The meeting was adjourned to Closed Session at 12:40 and reconvened at 1:05 a.m. MOTION: Councilmember. Lemons moved that the meeting be adjourned. The motion was seconded by Councilmember. Zeuschner and carried unanimously. (5-0) The meeting was adjourned at 1:07 a.m. , ZHS-P-&QTFULLY SUBMITTED, P EGG •HANAN DEPUTY CTY CLERK 14