HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 01-88 to 69-88RESOLUTIONS - 1988
NUMBER TITLE ADOPTED
63-88 RESOLUTION APPROVING MONTH -TO -MONTH CONTINUATION OF EXTEN-
SION OF DIAL -A -RIDE TRANSIT OPEATIONS AGMT WITH LAIDLAW
TRANSIT, INC. 06-27-88
64-88 RESOLUTION ADOPTING A BUDGET & MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR
FY 88-89 06-27-88
65-88 RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE CLASSFICIATION, COMPENSATION, &
TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT OF EXECUTIVE EMPLOYEES 06-27-88
66-88 RESOLUTION ORDERING PLACED ON THE BALLOT OF THE NEXT CITY
ELECTION INITIATIVE MEASURES TO PROHIBIT A GAZEBO IN MB
"CITY" PARK, AND TO REZONE "PINEY WAY VILLAGE" PROPERTY 06-27-88
67-88 RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE CLASSFICATION, COMPENSATION &
TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT OF FIRE FIGHTER EMPLOYEES 06-27-88
68-88 RESOLUTION ANNOUNCING FINDINGS & GRANTING AN APPEAL TO
PLAN.COMM. DENIAL OF CUP 39-86 (CONCEPT PLAN) & APPROVING
CUP FOR REMOVAL OF SEVERAL EXISTING VISITOR SERVING USES
LOCATED ON CITY LEASE SITES & REPLACEMENT WITH INTEGRATED
COMMERCIAL VISITOR SERVING PROJECT: Morro Bay Marina;
LS 711-77W 06-27-88
69-88 VOID
U/-11-
71-88
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO VACATE PUBLIC'S RIGHT TO
USE A PORTION OF NAPA AVENUE FOR STREET PURPOSES
7-11-88
72-88
RESOLUTION RE: MOU - MISCELLANEOUS EMPLOYEES
07-11-88
73=88
RESOLUTION RE: MOU - CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES
07-25-88
74-88
RESOLUTION STATING COMMITMENT TO ALLOCATE FUNDS
FOR TWIN BRIDGES REPLACEMENT PROJECT
07-25-88
75-88
RESOLUTION CONFIRMING REPORT RE: W ABATMENT PROCEDURES
& MAKING ASSESSMEMENTS
07-25-88
76-88
RESOLUTION PETITIONING THE VERNOR OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA TO NOMINATE M 0 BAY FOR THE,NATIONAL
ESTUARY PROGRAM
07-25-88
77-88
RESOLUTION ANNOUN NG FINDINGS & APPROVING A SIGN
EXCEPTION PERM - MITCHELL, 500 EMBARCADERO
07-25-88
78-88
RESOLUTIO DOPTING 1988-91 AGREEMENT FOR ANIMAL CON-
TROL S ICES WITH COUNTY OF SLO
07-25-88
79-88
R LUTION VACATING PUBLIC'S RIGHT TO USE A PORTION OF
PA AVENUE FOR STREET PURPOSES
08-08-88
RESOLUTIONS - 1988
6
NUMBER
TITLE
ADOPTED
48-88
RESOLUTION
ADOPTING THE 88/89 MASTER FEE
SCHEDULE
05-23-88
49-88
RESOLUTION
APPROVING APPLICATION FOR LAND
& WATER CON-
SERVATION
FUNDS, TIDELANDS PARK RECREATIONAL
PHASE
PROJECT
05-23-88
50-88
RESOLUTION
GRANTING AN APPEAL & MODIFYING
PLAN.COMM.
CONDITIONS
OF APPROVAL FOR A VARIANCE TO
ALLOW TANDEM
PARKING: James
Skaff, 458 Fresno Ave.
05-23-88
51-88 RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 95-87 IN ITS ENTIRETY
& ANNOUNCING FINDINGS & RECOMMENDING A GENERAL PLAN &
COASTAL LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT & CORRESPONDING CHANGE OF
° ZONE FOR CERTAIN DESCRIBED PROPERTIES; James Merson,
Corner Ironwood Ave. & Sequoia Court 05-23-88
52-88 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSENT TO SUBLEASE AGREEMENT ON A
PORTION OF LEASE SITE 71, & ADDING & DELETING PERMITTED
USES ON LEASE SITE 71-72W 05-23-88
53-88
RESOLUTION ESTABISHING NEW WATER & SEWER AVAILABILITY
CHARGES FOR THE VARIOUS CITY WATER ALLOCATION PROGRAMS
06-13-88
54-88
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING USER RATES & RELATED FEES &
DEPOSITS FOR SEWER SERVICES
06-13-88
55-88
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING USER RATES & RELATED FEES &
DEPOSITS FOR WATER SERVICES
06-13-88
56-88
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING STATE LEGISLATIVE REFORM OF THE
CALIF. WORKERS COMPENSATION SYSTEM (SB 323)
06-13-88
57-88
RESOLUTION REJECTING ALL BIDS ON WATERLINE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT NO. 87-10
06-13-88
58-88
RESOLUTION ANNOUNCING FINDINGS & DIRECTING THE COMM. DEV.
DIRECTOR TO GRANT ADMINISTRATIVE EXCEPTIONS TO THE PARKING
STANDARDS OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE FOR 2 YEARS IN DOWNTOWN
06-13-88
59-88
RESOLUTION ANNOUNCING FINDINGS & APPROVING AN INTERIM USE
PERMIT & COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR MINOR IMPROVEMENTS
TO AN EXISTING RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK & CAMPGROUND;
Morro Dunes RV, 1700 Embarcadero
06-13-88
60-88
RESOLUTION ANNOUNCING FINDINGS & APPROVING AN INTERIM USE
PERMIT & COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR MINOR PARK FACILITY
IMPROVEMENTS TO LILA KEISER PARK
06-27-88*
61-88
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE CLASSIFICATION, COMPENSATION, &
TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT OF MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY
06-13-88
62-88
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE FOR LS 62/62W
(HITTLE'S LANDING) FROM ROBERT E. & MARILYN HITTLE TO
ROBERT J. OBRIEN
06-27-88
*Adopted
out of sequence
• r
RESOLUTIONS - 1988
NUMBER TITLE ADOPTED
32-88 VOID (San Bernardo Creek Ballot Issue)
33-88 RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE PROHIBITION OF ON -STREET PARKING
IN THE VICINITY OF THE INTERSECTION OF QUINTANA ROAD &
KENNEDY WAY 04-25-88
34-88 RESOLUTION ORDERING PLACED ON THE BALLOT OF THE NEXT CITY
ELECTION A MEASURE AMENDING SECTION 17.50 OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE CREATING AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUSES &
INCENTIVES O4-25-88
35-88 RESOLUTION ORDERING PLACED ON THE BALLOT OF THE NEXT CITY
ELECTION AN INITIATIVE MEASURE ESTABLISHING AFFORDABLE
SENIOR HOUSING DENSITY BONUSES & OTHER INCENTIVES O4-25-88
36-88 RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 55-81, & AUTHORIZING
THE ADJUSTMENT & SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY 05-09-88
37-88 RESOLUTION AWARDING BID NO. PW 88-112 FOR ONE NEW 1-TON
TRUCK WITH UTILITY BODY 05-09-88
38-88 RESOLUTION AWARDING BID NO. PW 88-113 FOR WATERLINE
MATERIALS & FIRE HYDRANTS 05-09-88
39-88 VOID (Growth & water managment ballot issue)
40-88 RESOLUTION AWARDING RFP NO. PW 88-120 TO UPDATE THE CITY
OF MB TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN, 1988-1993 05-09-88
41-88 RESOLUTION AWARDING BID NO. PW 87-11 FOR WEED ABATEMENT
MOWING TO JACK R. BRIDWELL OF ATASCADERO, CA 05-09-88
42-88 RESOLUTION REJECTING BIDS & STATING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR
THE USE OF DAY LABOR - WATERLINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT NO
PW 87-10
43-88 RESOLUTION CALLING A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD
11-8-88 FOR THE PURPOSE OF ELECTING CERTAIN OFFICERS, &
REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SLO COUNTY TO CON-
SOLIDATE SAID ELECTION WITH STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO
BE HELD, & OTHER ELECTION MATTERS AS REQUIRED BY LAW 05-09-88
44-88 RESOLUTION ADOPTING A STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN FOR THE
CITY OF MB. 05-09-88
45-88 RESOLUTION REJECTING BID ON PROJECT PW 87-09, POLICE
STATION RENOVATION 05-09-88
46-88 VOID (Police station remodel negotiations)
47-88 RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION FOR FUNDING FROM GENERAL
ALLOCATION OF CDBG PROGRAM FOR HOUSING REHAB PROJECT 05-09-88
RESOLUTIONS - 1988
NUMBER
TITLE
ADOPTED
17-88
RESOLUTION ANNOUNCING FINDINGS & APPROVING A CONDI-
TIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL USES IN DEL
MAR PARK
03-14-88
18-88
RESOLUTION AWARDING INTERIOR DESIGN & PURCHASING
SERVICES CONTRACT FOR MB COMMUNITY CENTER TO INTERIOR
PLANNING RESOURCE
03-14-88
19-88
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION OF UP TO $50,000 FROM
MR. WALTER AXELSON FOR PAVING OF KERN AVENUE
03-28-88
20-88
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A REVISED
GRANT DEED FOR PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT
MORRO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (COMMUNITY CENTER)
03-28-88
21-88
RESOLUTION DECLARING WEEDS A NUISANCE & FIRE HAZARD
& AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO PROCEED
WITH ABATEMENT
03-28-88
22-88
RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSENT TO SUBLEASE AGREEMENT ON
LEASE SITES 129W-133W
03-28-88
23-88
RESOLUTION ORDERING PLACED ON THE BALLOT OF THE NEXT
CITY ELECTION A MEASURE TO AMEND THE BUSINESS LICENSE
TAX PROVISIONS TO PROVIDE FOR AUTOMATIC ANNUAL
ADJUSTMENTS
03-28-88
24-88
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF AGREEMENT
BETWEEN CLARICE E. RIGHETTI & THE CITY OF MORRO BAY
03-28-88
25-88
RESOLUTION APPROVING CITY OF MB LOCAL TRANSPORATION
FUND & STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE CLAIMS FOR FY 88-89
04-11-88
26-88
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF LS 82-85/82W-85W
FROM CABRILLO ENTERPRISES TO ROSE'S LANDING INC. A
CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
04-11-88
27-88
RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSENT TO SUBLEASE AGREEMENT
OF PORTIONS OF LS 80-81W TO MORRO BAY SEAFOOD, &
APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO MASTER LEASE AGREEMENT
04-25-88
28-88
RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSENT TO SUBLEASE AGREEMENT
OF LS 71
04-11-88
29-88
RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSENT TO SUBLEASE AGREEMENT
OF LS 73
04-11-88
30-88
RESOLUTION OPPOSING ENACTMENT OF AB 2802 (CABLE TV)
06-13-88*
31r88
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLIC AREA USE PERMIT NO. 207
FOR SPECIAL HARBOR USE BY CAL POLY CREW TO HOLD A
REGATTA ON APRIL 23, 1988
04-11-88
* Adopted out of sequence.
• RESOLUTIONS - 1988 •
NUMBER
TITLE
ADOPTED
01-88
RESOLUTION DECLARING MORRO BAY AN OFFICIAL PORT -OF -
CALL FOR THE REVENUE CUTTER CALIFORNIAN
01-11-88
02-88
RESOLUTION ENDORSING THE "GOVERNMENT SPENDING LIMITA-
TION AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT" INITIATIVE ON THE JUNE
1988 BALLOT
'01-11-88
03-88
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE VISIT OF THE GOLDEN HINDE
& WAIVER OF DOCKAGE FEES
01-25-88
04-88
RESOLUTION ANNOUNCING FINDINGS RE: SECOND POLE SIGN -
HEMPENIUS
02-08-88*
05-88
RESOLUTION ANNOUNDING FINDINGS & RECOMMENDING ADOPTION
OF PRELIMINARY GENERAL PLAN FOR ATASCADERO STATE BEACH
01-25-88
06-88
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS, TRACT 1028,
ACCEPTING OFFER OF DEDICATION OF STORM DRAINAGE EASE-
MENT, AUTHORIZING NOTICE OF COMPLETION
02-08-88
07-88
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDING
OF A FISH CLEANING STATION AT TIDELANDS PARK
02-08-88
08-88
RESOLUTION DENYING APPEAL RE: CUP 41-88 (AMENDED) FOR
A VACUUM TYPE FISH OFFLOADING DEVICE (ORVAL LEAGE;
LEASE SITE 35W-36W)
02-08-88
09-88
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING NEW WATER & SEWER AVAILABILITY
CHARGES FOR VARIOUS CITY WATER ALLOCATION PROGRAMS"
02-22-88
10-88'
VOID (sublease request)
11-88
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A WATER ALLOCATION PROGRAM FOR 1988
&
SETTING FORTH THE ANNUAL 1988 PROGRAM & OPEATING GUIDE-
LINES FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL, NEW COMMERCIAL, & NEW
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
02-22-88
12-88
RESOLUTION APPROVING NEW 29 YEAR 9 MONTH LEASE &
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FOR LEASE SITES 62-62W WITH DR.
ROBERT E. & MRS. MARILYN HITTLE
02-22-88
13-88
VOID (Wildlife Bond Act support)
14-88
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FILING OF AN APPLICATION WITH
THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD TO APPROPRIATE
WATER FROM THE UNDERFLOW OF CHORRO CREEK (DOMENGHINI
FLAT)
03-14-88
15-88
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR SAFE DRINKING
WATER BOND LOAN FOR WATER TREATMENT PLANT
03-14-88
16-88
RESOLUTION ANNOUNCING FINDINGS & RECOMMENDING ADOPTION
OF PRELIMINARY GENERAL PLAN FOR MORRO BAY STATE PARK
03-14-88
0
ire /9 SY ;p4�3 - 6 g
t
• MORRO BAY MARINA •
Lease Site 71-77W
RESOLUTION NO. 68-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MORRO BAY, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND
GRANTING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF
CUP 39-86 (CONCEPT PLAN) AND APPROVING OF SAID CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR THE REMOVAL OF SEVERAL EXISTING VISITOR SERVING USES
LOCATED ON CITY LEASE SITES AND REPLACEMENT WITH AN INTEGRATED
COMMERCIAL VISITOR SERVING PROJECT
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Morro Bay,
California, did on the 18th day of April, 1988 hold a duly
noticed PUBLIC HEARING after which it approved a Final EIR, and
denied without prejudice, a Conditional Use Permit to allow a new
commercial complex on City lease sites between the Embarcadero
and the ends of Pacific and Marina Streets in the WF/PD zone
(Case No. CUP 39-86); and,
WHEREAS, on May 3, 1988 the applicant did appeal the
Planning Commission's action; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of •the City of Morro Bay,
California, on the 9th and 23rd days of May and 13th day of June
1988 held duly noticed PUBLIC HEARINGS on said appeal; and
WHEREAS, at the PUBLIC HEARING of May 23rd, after
considering the Final Environmental Impact Report, and the
testimony both written and oral, of all persons wishing to
testify, the City Council did find the Final EIR adequate and
complete and did certify the Final EIR; and
WHEREAS, at the PUBLIC HEARING of June 13th, 1988, after
considering the staff reports, and testimony, both written and
oral, of all persons wishing to testify, the City Council did
find the following facts and reasons to justify the granting of
said appeal and approval of CUP 39-86:
1. The use requested is properly one for the WF/PD zone, and is
consistent with the policies and objectives of the Morro Bay
General Plan and Certified Local Coastal Program to wit;
In accordance with the provisions of section 17.36 of the
Morro Bay Municipal Code the proposed project qualifies as a
Planned Development project and may vary from the normal
standards of the base zoning district concerning height
limitations because the project provides extraordinary
public benefits including outstanding architectural design,
unusual levels of public shoreline access, and public open
space, and reserves space for coastal dependent priority
uses.
City Council Resolution No. 68-88
Page Two
2. The conditions of approval will insure that the use will not
be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and
general welfare of the persons residing or working in the
neighborhood of this proposed use;
3. The conditions of approval will insure that the use will not
be injurious or detrimental to property and improvements int
he neighborhood or general welfare of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and
constitute the findings of the Council in this matter; and,
2. That the Council does hereby grant the appeal of Stan Trapp.
3. That the Council does hereby approve Case No.CUP 39-
86(Concept Plan), subject to the conditions attached hereto
and made a part of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay, on the 27th day of June, 1988, by the
following vote to wit:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons Reddell
NOES: Odell, Sheetz
ABSENT: None
rE RED L,—Mayor---_____
EH UAV city er
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Case No. CUP 39-86 (Concept Plan)
STANDARD CONDITIONS
1. This Conditional Use Permit No. 39-86 (Concept Plan), is
granted for the land described in the application and any
attachments thereto, and as shown on Exhibit A, and on
file with the Community Development Department. The
locations of all buildings and other features shall be
located and designed substantially as shown on the
aforementioned exhibit, unless otherwise specified herein.
2. Unless the construction or operation of the structure or
facility is commenced not later than one (1) year after the
effective date of this approval and is diligently pursued
thereafter, this approval will automatically become null and
void; provided, however, that upon the written request of
the applicant, prior to the expiration of this approval, an
extension for not more than one (1) additional year may be
granted by the Community Development Director, upon finding
that the project complies with all applicable provisions of
the Morro Bay Municipal Code in effect at the time of the
extension request.
3. Any minor change may be approved by the Community
Development Director. Any substantial change will require
the filing of an application for an amendment to be
considered by the Planning Commission.
4. All requirements of any law, ordinance or regulation of the
State of California, City of Morro Bay, and any other
governmental entity shall be complied with in the exercise
of this approval.
5. Prior to obtaining a building permit and within thirty (30)
days hereof, the applicant shall file with the Director of
Planning and Community Development written acceptance of the
conditions stated herein.
Compliance with and execution of all conditions listed
hereon shall be necessary, unless otherwise specified, prior
to obtaining final building inspection clearance. Deviation
from this requirement shall be permitted only by written
consent of the Community Development Director and/or as
authorized by the Planning Commission. Failure to comply
with these conditions shall render this entitlement null and
void. Continuation of the use without a valid entitlement
will constitute a violation of the Morro Bay Municipal Code
and is a misdemeanor.
Conditions of Approval
Page 2-
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
0
CUP 39-86 (Concept Plan)
7. Applicant shall submit, prior to precise plan approval,
estimates of water supply requirement for domestic and fire -
flow purposes so staff may determine if the existing water
system can provide the required flows. Prior to final
occupancy approval, any improvements to the water system
required as a result of this project, including additional
fire hydrants, shall be constructed by the applicant at no
cost to the City.
8. Applicant shall submit, prior to precise plan approval,
estimates of sewer system demand so staff may determine if
the existing sewer system is adequate to serve the proposed
project. Any improvements to the sewer system required as a
result of this project shall be constructed by the applicant
at no cost to the City, prior to final occupancy approval.
9. Applicant shall install, prior to final occupancy approval,
handicap ramps and reconstruct existing driveways and
sidewalks in the public right-of-way in accordance with City
Standard Drawings and Specifications at no cost to the City.
The EZIt—(p. 6- recommences si-dewaI"ks should be a minimum of
ten feet wide with more liberal width preferable. The Draft
Circulation Element recommends both eight feet and ten— eef
aw the sta—n and for sidewalks on the Embarcadero.
10. Applicant shall provide off-street loading areas for
commercial deliveries at each end of the project off the
Embarcadero at no cost to the City. Applicant shall restrict
commercial deliveries to time outside peak traffic hours. If
the plan for off-street loading areas results in a loss of
existing public parking spaces, such spaces shall be made up
at other locations as part of the project's overall parking
program.
11. Applicant shall submit, prior to precise plan approval,
detailed engineering drawings of on -site drainage
improvements for the project. This shall include
calculations demonstrating the drainage facilities will be
adequate to pass peak flows from a 25-year storm. Any
drainage systems emptying into Morro Day shall be fitted
with grease traps.
12. Applicant shall submit, prior to precise plan approval,
detailed engineering drawings showing repairs and
construction proposed for the revetment and dock area, and
after approval by the Director of Public Works, shall
obtain all necessary permits for said repairs and
construction from the California Coastal Commission and U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers.
1
Conditions of Approval CUP 39-86 (Concept Plan)
Page 3
Prior to final occupancy approval applicant shall construct
all said improvements and repairs at no cost to the City.
(Revetment stability problems were identified at this site
several years ago and requirements for repairs were deferred
pending development of the subject project.)
13. Applicant shall pay fees to the City prior to final
occupancy approval, for ,his proportionate share of the cost
to improve intersections based on the project's contribution
to increased traffic demands. The EIR (p. 6.3) indicates
traffic volume increases as a percentage of existing
traffic. Applicant shall submit prior to precise plan
approval, engineering cost estimates for necessary
improvements as indicated in the EIR and the City's Draft
Circulation Element. and the fees shall be based on tliese
esfimafes:—
Embarcadero—Pacific 12.0%
Embarcadero—Marina 7.0%
Main St. —Marina 5.4%
Main St. —Pacific 5.1%
Main St. —Morro Bay Blvd. 4.3%
Main St. —Harbor St. 1.5%
Main St. —Beach St. 2.9%
14. Construction of public improvements, including work within
the public right of way and the revetment and dock area will
require plans to be approved and permits issued by the
Department of Public Works. Applicant will further be
required to post bonds for 150% of the estimated cost of
construction of all said improvements and repairs.
15. Fire protection shall be provided as follows:
a. Demolition of all structures shall be coordinated with the
Fire Chief prior to the issuance of a demolition permit.
b. Fire protection impact fees calculated at S.10 per square
foot of the total floor area shall be paid to the City prior.
to final occupancy approval.
C. Provide capability for the Fire Department to draft water
out of the Bay at Marina and Pacific Street ends; modify
site plans prior to precise plan approval to " -
demonstrate that the necessary fire access to the Bay is
available.
d. Building plans shall include the following provisions
concerning fire protection and shall be approved by the Fire
Chief prior to the beginning of construction.
— all structures, including the platform, shall be protected
with fire sprinklers in conformance with NPFA 13.
Conditions of Approval CUP 39-86 (Concept Plan).
Page 4
- Wood shake or .wood shingles shall not be permitted.
All elevators shall be at least 80 inches diagonal.
Provide 1 1/2 inch hose cabinets with 1 1/2 hose and plastic
nozzles, as approved by the_Fire Chief along the dock.
Sprinkler and alarm plans.
16.. Parking requirements shall be met through a combination of
the payment. to the City of in -lieu parking fees, and
Provision of off -site parking either within three hundred
feet of the project pursuant to Municipal Code Section
17.33.090 or on an adjacent parcel on the north east corner
of the intersection of the Embarcadero and Marina street.
Prior to precise plan approval, the exact number of parking
spaces required for the project shall be calculated based on
the final site plans and in accordance with Municipal Code
Chapter 17.44 provided, however, that the modified parking
standards contained in the Draft Circulation Element of the
General Plan shall be used in the calculations. Further the
total amount of parking required shall be reduced by thirty
two (32). parking spaces as credit for existing "grand -
fathered" parking for uses previously in existence. The
remaining parking requirement shall be met by payment to the
City prior to issuance of building permits of an in -lieu fee
of four thousand dollars ($4,000.00) for each required
space. Further the applicant must sign a written agreement
to be bound by, to participate in and to waive the right to
protest any area -wide parking management district or special
assessment district for parking created or formed in the
future by the City.
In addition, a paved parking lot within three hundred feet
of the project or upon that parcel on the north east corner
of the intersection of the Embarcadero and Marina Street,
with approximately 18 parking spaces, shall be developed and
Placed in use as exclusive parking for the project for a
period of not less than four years from the date of issuance
of a certificate of occupancy. These eighteen 'spaces are
not subtracted from the total number of spaces required and
for which Applicant shall pay an in -lieu fee.
A parking agreement as approved by the City Attorney shall
be executed by Applicant with the City containing these
conditions and agreements prior to the approval of
Applicant's Precise Plan,
17. The approved project design shall.be as shown in attachment
A. The maximum height of the for all structures shall be 26
feet, except for the elevator tower which shall not exceed
29 feet in heightv nor exceed the minimum width necessary to;
house the elevator upwards from the base of the second floor.
Conditions of Approal CUP 39-86 (Concept P1an7
Page 5
18. Public restrooms on the ground floor shall be available for
general public use during normal business hours and during
evening hours when the restaurant is open. Appropriate
signing shall be provided indicating the location of the
restrooms. The restrooms shall be maintained and available
for public use at no cost to the City.
19. Permanent public access shall be maintained to and along the
decking on the bay side of the project from the Pacific and
Marina Street ends and through the center of the site as
indicated on the proposed site plan. This public access
shall be identified by signs and made available for public
use at all times and shall be maintained in a safe condition
at no cost to the City. Formal agreements securing such
public access shall be approved by the City and accepted by
the Executive Director of the Coastal Commission, and signed
by the applicant prior to final building occupancy approval.
20. Detailed plans for landscaping, signing, exterior building
materials and colors, lighting, trash enclosures benches
and seating, railings and any other exterior improvements
shall submitted prior to precise plan approval.
21. Applicant shall obtain a sign permit prior to the
installation of any signs on the site.
21. Water saving devices shall be required throughout the
project and shall be approved by the Chief Building
Inspector.
22. Applicant shall obtain, prior to issuance of building
permits, any necessary water awards and approvals of water
equivalencies by the City.
23. All on -site utility service and distribution lines shall be
installed underground.
24. If any private improvements are proposed in the public
right-of-way, Special Encroachment Permits from the city
shall be obtained prior to issuance of Building Permits.
25. Not less than twenty percent (20%) of the project's total
floor area shall be devoted to coastal dependent or coastal
related land uses. At least ten percent (10%) of such area
shall be made available for use as a marine research
facility for which the City shall be the agency responsible
to locate and negotiate with a tenant for such facility.
Applicant shall be entitled to reduced rent for such marine
research facility in the same proportion as the rent charged
to the marine research facility is to the rate charged for
other space within the project. Applicant shall execute and
addendum to his lease, as approved by the City Attorney,
reflecting these conditions and restrictions on the use of
the lease site.
e
01
,�$f�? I• f ji Lllbl I'
f�
i��:.�r.L i .• E I�Il lllij•
drn
I
TELj�dl 1 �� �' ,`•\./:.r.e a i ICI III!
1.."� -
!� ;� __I.•-;�,.. /�•y'^;',` :ems=.;:
. � •;�._--t I i ��`\\\////// "'\\)� ,.. ILIA Jc'!.
.� I �' r"mix.; p`�I II •� :I�c. t.
01.
RT
'tom-fv/_— I� /_ � 1: � _ •� �� �,,�!I:I�I; 1
tip.. € � !� -•`\ I. ;%" . _ i �,. � .'.'r,� I
�:• �.I :,�\ i Vim.,. .�rj�;I�I I.I:�
'L
`\av 1.
-
x---�,�-
u
J
I
0
RESOLUTION NO. 67-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MORRO BAY, CALIFORNIA RELATING TO
THE CLASSIFICATION, COMPENSATION, AND
TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT OF FIRE FIGHTER
EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY
THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of the California
Government Code Section 35000 et. seq. and Resolution No. 74-69
of the City of Morro Bay, the City's representatives have met and
conferred in good faith with the representatives of the Morro Bay
Fire Fighters pertaining to the subject of wages, benefits, and
conditions of employment for the fire fighter employees of the
City; and
WHEREAS, the meetings between the Morro Bay Fire Fighters
and the City have resulted in a mutual agreement and
understanding to recommend that the employees represented by the
Morro Bay Fire Fighters accept all of the terms and conditions as
set forth in a Memorandum of Understanding, an agreement attached
and made a part of this resolution herewith; and
WHEREAS, the City now desires to provide said changes in
benefits to said fire fighter employees of the City of Morro Bay;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay does hereby approve and adopt in full the
Memorandum of Understanding as attached and made a part of this
resolution herewith.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of Morro Bay at a
regular meeting thereof held this 27th day of Jun 1988, by the
following roll call vote.
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Dale Reddell, Mayor
ATTEST:
Ardith Davis, City Clerk
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN THE MORRO BAY FIRE FIGHTERS
AND THE CITY OF MORRO BAY
ARTICLE 1 - PREAMBLE
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay is a municipal corporation
existing under the laws of the State of California as a general
law city; and
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay is limited, insofar as funds are
concerned, because of a fixed tax rate; and in structure because
it is a public entity rather than a profit -making business; and
WHEREAS, the Morro Bay Fire Fighters and the City of Morro Bay
recognize that the mission and the purpose of the City is to
provide high -quality and economical municipal services and
facilities to the residents of the City of Morro Bay:
THEREFORE, this Memorandum of Understanding is entered into as of
1 July 1988 between the City of Morro Bay, referred to as CITY,
and the Morro Bay Fire Fighters, referred to as MBFF.
It is the intent and purpose of this memorandum to assure sound
and mutually beneficial working and economic relations and
conditions between the parties hereto; to provide for an orderly
and peaceable method and manner of resolving any differences
which may arise and to negotiate any misunderstanding which could
arise and to set forth herein the basic and full agreement
between the parties concerning the pay, wages, hours of
employment, and other terms and conditions of employment.
ARTICLE 2 - TERM
The term of this Memorandum of Understanding shall be for the
period beginning 1 July 1988 and ending 30 June 1994.
If either party wants to renegotiate a successor agreement, such
party shall serve upon the other during the period 1 February to
1 March of the last year in the term of this Agreement, its
written request to begin negotiations as well as its written
Proposals amending this agreement.
Upon receipt of such written notice and proposals, negotiation
shall begin no later than thirty (30) days after such receipt or
1 April, whichever is later.
ARTICLE 3 - MBFF RECOGNITION
Pursuant to the applicable provisions of the California
Government Code, as amended, CITY does hereby recognize MBFF as
the designated representative of the fire fighters of the City of
Morro Bay for the purpose of meeting and conferring in good faith
in respect to rates of pay, wages, hours and other terms and
3
conditions of employment except as otherwise provided herein, for
all permanent fire fighteremployees of CITY who are members of
the Fire Unit.
During the first six (6) months of this Agreement there shall be
an election held to determine the representative status of the
MBFF. Such election shall be conducted by the State Conciliation
Service with election rules mutually agreed to by the parties.
ARTICLE 4 - MANAGEMENT
The CITY retains all rights not specifically delegated by this
agreement including but not limited to the exclusive right to
determine the mission of its constituent departments; set
standards of service; determine the procedures and standards of
selection for employment and promotion; direct its employees;
take disciplinary action for proper cause; relieve its employees
from duty because of lack of work or for other legitimate
reasons; maintain the efficiency of governmental operations;
determine the methods, means and personnel by which governmental
operations are to be conducted; determine the content of job
classifications; take all necessary actions to carry out its
mission in emergencies and exercise control and discretion over
its organization and the technology of performing its work.
Changes made pursuant to the Emergency clause shall only be in
effect for the term of the emergency. The determination of
whether or not an emergency exists is solely within the
discretion of the CITY and is expressly excluded from the
grievance procedure.
ARTICLE 5 - ANTI -DISCRIMINATION
The parties agree they shall not discriminate against an employee
on the basis of his/her membership or non -membership in the MBFF
nor on the basis of age, race, religious creed, sex, color,
national origin, marital status, ancestry or physical handicap.
ARTICLE 6 - MBFF BUSINESS
6.1 Employee representatives designated by the MBFF shall be
granted time off, without loss of pay, to attend "meet and
confer" sessions with the Municipal Employee Relations
Officer and/or his designee on subjects within the scope of
representation when such meetings are scheduled during
regular working hours. Also, with prior approval of the
Chief, the employee representative may have reasonable
release time to prepare for "meet and confer" sessions.
6.2 It is understood that this time -off provision shall only
apply to a maximum of two employees attending any one
meeting between CITY and MBFF where exceptional
circumstances warrant, the City Administrator may approve
the attendance at such meetings of additional employee
representatives. The MBFF shall, whenever practicable,
Cd
submit the names of all employee representatives to the
Municipal Employee Relations Officer at least two working
days in advance of such meetings. Provided further (1) that
no employee representative shall leave his or her duty or
work station or assignment without specific approval of the
department head or other authorized City management
official; and (2) that any such meeting is subject to
scheduling mutually agreed upon by the parties.
6.3 Nothing provided herein
management from scheduling
regular City or work hours.
shall limit or restrict City
such meetings before or after
6.4 Negotiations pursuant to Article 2, TERM, shall be conducted
on neutral ground, unless there is mutual agreement
otherwise.
ARTICLE 7 - WITHHOLDING OF MBFF DUES AND INSURANCE
7.1 It is agreed that CITY will withhold MBFF dues and MBFF
group insurance premiums and other deductions authorized by
the City and the employee from the monthly pay of each
permanent fire fighting City employee who is a member of the
MBFF. CITY does not accept responsibility for computing the
amounts of deductions or for meeting payment dates which may
not coincide with established pay periods. MBFF agrees to
provide CITY with individual MBFF member authorizations
signed by the individual MBFF member authorizing CITY to
make agreed deductions; specifying the amount of each
deduction; and authorizing CITY to issue a check, payable to
MBFF for the collective amount of the individual deductions.
CITY will issue a single check to the MBFF for the total
amount of deductions withheld from the individual fire
fighter's pay. The MBFF will be responsible for properly
notifying CITY of any changes in deductions and will be the
sole agent through which CITY will act in explaining,
initiating, executing, or terminating the provisions of this
Article.
7.2 MBFF shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Morro
Bay, its officers, agents, and employees from any and all
claims, demands, damages, costs, expenses, or liability
arising out of this Article.
7.3 It is agreed that CITY will deposit payroll deductions made
payable to the San Luis Obispo City and County Employee
Credit Union providing the MBFF makes arrangements for such
services that are acceptable to both members and CITY.
ARTICLE 8 - WORK SCHEDULE
8.1 Guarantee This article is intended to define the normal
hours of work and shall not be construed as a guarantee of
work per day or work per week or of days of work per week.
5
0 •
8.2 Workday The normal workday shall be a twenty-four (24)
consecutive hour period, except in cases of emergency.
8.3 Workshift Employees shall be scheduled to work on regular
workshifts having regular starting and quitting times.
Except for emergencies, employee's workshifts shall not be
changed without prior notice to the employee. Neither call
out nor overtime shall constitute a change in workshift.
8.4 Workweek The normal workweek shall average fifty-six (56)
hours of work in a seven (7) consecutive day period, except
in cases of emergency.
8.5 Emergencies Nothing herein shall be construed to limit or
restrict the authority of management to make temporary
assignments to different or additional locations, shifts, or
duties for the purpose of meeting an emergency. Such
emergency assignments shall not extend beyond the period of
said emergency.
ARTICLE 9 - MINIMUM STAFFING
CITY agrees to provide minimum staffing of two full-time
personnel except in cases of emergency as determined by the Fire
Chief.
ARTICLE 10 - LAYOFFS
The parties agree to use the layoff procedure as set forth in
2.32.120 of the City of Morro Bay Municipal Code.
ARTICLE 11 - FIRE ENGINEER RATING
11.1 It is recognized, in principle, as long as the full-time
Unit personnel complement of the Morro Bay Fire Department
remains at ten (10) or less, that efficient operation of the
Department requires an increase in the authorized number of
Fire Engineers. Accordingly, CITY agrees to promote to Fire
Engineer all personnel classified as Fire Fighter provided
that they have served for one (1) full year with the CITY in
the Fire Fighter classification; that at the completion of
one (1) full year of employment, they have been recommended
by the Fire Chief for promotion and have demonstrated,
through successful completion of written and practical
examinations that they have successfully completed six
semester units of Fire Science courses at an institution
approved by the Fire Chief. The City shall make every
effort to schedule the examination to be completed prior to
the annual anniversary date. The content and passing grade
of the written and practical examinations will be determined
by the Fire Chief subject to the approval of the City
Administrator.
11.2 An individual recommended for promotion, and failing to
attain a passing grade in either the written or practical
examination, shall not be eligible for reexamination until
six (6) months after the date of failure.
ARTICLE 12 - SALARIES
12.1 The CITY shall continue a plan whereby the CITY shall
contribute up to seven (7) percent of an employee's salary
on behalf of the employee to the PERS. The CITY
contribution will be the employee's actual PERS obligation
to a maximum of seven (7) percent.
12.2 These amounts paid by the CITY are employee contributions
and are paid by the CITY to partially satisfy the employee's
obligation to contribute to PERS. An employee has no option
to receive the contributed amounts directly instead of
having them paid by the CITY to PERS on behalf of the
employee. The MBFF understands and agrees that employees
bear the risk of payment of any increases in the employee
contributions above the current percentage made by action of
the PERS or the state legislature.
It is understood and agreed to by the parties that the CITY
"Pick -UP" of the employee's PERS contribution is made in
lieu of a wage increase. Therefore, in all comparisons made
with other agencies, the PERS percentage pick-up will be
added to the salaries otherwise provided by the CITY to the
employee, and then, comparisons will be made.
Parties agree the CITY payment of PERS contributions is made
based upon tax treatment currently permitted by the State
Franchise Tax Board and the IRS. Should current tax
treatment change, the MBFF and the employee hold harmless
the CITY, its officers and agents from any and all claims or
costs of any type including but not limited to liability for
back taxes, arising out of this agreement to pay part of the
employee's PERS contribution. Should current tax treatment
change, the MBFF shall have the opportunity to meet and
confer regarding any such changes.
12.3 The parties agree that the employees in this unit shall
receive the following percentage increases:
July
January
1988-89
2.5%
3%
1989-90
0
2%
1990-91
2.5%
3%
1991-92
0
3%
1992-93
3%
3%
1993-94
3%
3%
7
12.4 Annual salaries during the term of the Agreement shall be:
CAPTAIN
July 88 $26,431-$32,904
Jan 89 $27,224-$33,891
Jan 90 $27,768-$34,569
July 90 $28,462-$35,433
Jan 91 $29,316-$36,496
Jan 92 $30,195-$37,591
July 92 $31,101-$38,719
Jan 93 $32,034-$39,881
July 93 $32,995-$41,077
Jan 94 $33,985-$42,309
FIRE PREV SPEC
ENGINEER
$22,859-$28,688
$23,545-$29,549
$24,016-$30,140
$24,616-$30,894
$25,354-$31,821
$26,115-$32,776
$26,898-$33,759
$27,705-$34,772
$28,536-$35,815
$29,392-$36,889
ARTICLE 13 - VACATIONS AND HOLIDAYS
FIREFIGHTER
$21,706-$27,071
$22,357-$27,883
$22,804-$28,441
$23,374-$29,152
$24,075-$30,027
$24,797-$30,928
$25,541-$31,856
$26,307-$32,812
$27,096-$33,796
$27,909-$34,810
13.1 CITY and MBFF agree that difficulties exist in equating the work
schedules of fire fighters to the work schedule of nonshift
personnel, i.e., shift periods compared to hours and days worked
by other City employees. Therefore, a formula is agreed to for
computing the vacations and holiday periods for fire fighters.
Such formula is agreed to be a ratio as follows: Fire fighter's
total available shifts per year is to the general employees'
total available work days per year (260) as X is to the number of
authorized vacation and holidays days of the general employees;
when X equals the amount of shifts off for fire fighters
comparing fire fighters to employees of equal tenure.
13.2 Pursuant to Section 13.1, the following lists the vacation and
holiday annual accrual schedule for members of the unit:
SERVICE
VACATION
HOLIDAY
TOTAL
ANNUAL
SHIFTS/
YEARS
ACCRUAL
ACCRUAL
ENTITLEMENT
YEAR
0
thru
2
112.0
hrs.
134.4
hrs.
246.4
hrs.
10.267
3
thru
4
123.2
hrs.
134.4
hrs.
257.6
hrs.
10.733
5
thru
6
134.4
hrs.
134.4
hrs.
268.8
hrs.
11.200
7
thru
8
145.6
hrs.
134.4
hrs.
280.0
hrs.
11.667
9
thru
10
156.8
hrs.
134.4
hrs.
291.2
hrs.
12.133
11
thru
12
168.0
hrs.
134.4
hrs.
302.4
hrs.
12.600
13
thru
14
179.2
hrs.
134.4
hrs.
313.6
hrs.
13.067
15
thru
16
190.4
hrs.
134.4
hrs.
324.8
hrs.
13.533
17
thru
18
201.6
hrs.
134.4
hrs.
336.0
hrs.
14.000
19
thru
20
212.8
hrs.
134.4
hrs.
347.2
hrs.
14.467
21
+
224.0
hrs.
134.4
hrs.
358.4
hrs.
14.933
13.3 There is no limit on the amount of unused vacation and holiday
leave hours that may be accumulated by members of this unit;
provided, however, that upon termination of employment with the
CITY, a member of this unit shall receive pay for his/her current
vacation leave balance up to a maximum of the employee's annual
entitlement at his/her current base hourly rate.
E
13.4 The following holidays are used in Section 13.2 above to
determine TOTAL ANNUAL ENTITLEMENT. Employees may be scheduled
to work on holidays. All employees shall be compensated for
holidays as provided in 13.2 above.
Independence Day
Labor Day
Veteran's Day
Thanksgiving Day
Day after Thanksgiving
Christmas Day
Day after Christmas
New Year's Day
Lincoln's Birthday
Washington's Birthday
Memorial Day
Floating Holiday
July 4
lst Monday in September
November 11
4th Thursday
in November
Friday after
Thanksgiving
December 25
December 26
January 1
February 12
3rd Monday in
February
Last Monday in
May
Varies
13.5 For any holiday proclaimed by the Mayor, employees shall be paid
for 11.2 hours of work. Employees may be scheduled to work on
such holidays.
13.6 Employees assigned to a 40-hour week schedule, shall earn
vacation on the same basis as other similarly situated City
employees.
13.7 If an employee's assignment is changed from 40-hours per week to
56-hours per week, or vice -versa, for a prolonged period, then
the vacation accrual and use rate shall be changed to the
appropriate rate.
ARTICLE 14 - SICK LEAVE
14.1 It is agreed that the fire fighters will earn eight hours of sick
leave per month. This is the equivalent of one normal shift of
24 hours. Effective 1 July 1991, there shall be no maximum
number of sick leave hours that a member of this unit may accrue.
14.2 Illness causing absence for one shift will result in the loss of
eight hours of sick leave. Illness causing absence of less than
one full shift shall be charged at the rate of one hour sick
leave for each three hours or fraction thereof of shift duty
time.
ARTICLE 15 - MEDICAL INSURANCE
15.1 HEALTH INSURANCE
During the term of this Agreement, the City shall offer both
indemnity and HMO medical insurance plans unless during the term
of the Agreement the Employee Relations Committee recommends
alternative plans and the recommendation is accepted by the City
Council.
7
15.2 DENTAL INSURANCE
During the term of this Agreement, the City shall offer
dental insurance through a dental carrier, unless during
the term of the Agreement the Employee Relations Committee
recommends an alternative carrier and the recommendation is
accepted by the City Council.
15.3 Effective 1 July 1988, the employees shall pay the following
monthly premium rates for medical and dental insurance:
HMO Plan M E D I C A L DENTAL
Years of
Service Employee +1 dep +2 dep All
0 - 2 0 $19.59 $32.47 $3.07
3 - 4 0 9.80 16.24 1.54
4+ 0 0 0 .0
Indemnity Plan
0 - 2 0 17.91 30.79 3.07
3 - 4 0 8.12 14.56 1.54
4+ 0 0 0 0
15.4 Any changes to the dependent portion of medical or dental
Premiums that occur during the term of this Agreement shall
be shared one half by the employee and one half by the City.
15.5 The effective date of this Memorandum of Understanding shall
also be the effective date of the Consolidated Omnibus
Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) provisions for members of
this unit. It is agreed that the City's Employee Relations
Committee shall explore the feasibility of retiree health
care beyond COBRA time requirements.
ARTICLE 16 -.EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVES
16.1 CITY agrees to pay the cost of tuition and books for members
of Unit enrolled in Fire Science courses offered by
accredited institutions and which have been approved by the
Fire Chief and City Administrator. Hardback books for which
CITY has paid will become CITY property and will be kept at
Fire Department headquarters as a reference library from
which books may be drawn for use in approved course work.
16.2 CITY will pay $25/month for possession of a College level
Certificate of Achievement in Fire Science; and
CITY will pay $50/month for possession of an AA Degree; or
CITY will pay $100/month for possession of a BA Degree.
W
Such incentive pay shall be paid bi-weekly to employees who
hold job -related degrees as determined by the department
head and Personnel Officer. Employees who are receiving
such incentive on 30 June 1983, shall continue to receive
such incentive as computed above for the term of this
agreement.
If an employee is promoted to a classification that requires
a degree, the employee shall not receive any education
incentive pay for the required degree.
ARTICLE 17 - MEDIC INCENTIVE
17.1 An employee certified as an EMT -II shall receive an
incentive as follows:
First year as EMT II with City $150/mo
Second year as EMT II with City $200/mo
Third year as EMT II with City and thereafter $250/mo
17.2 An entry level firefighter shall not be required or
permitted to perform as an EMT -II, and therefore, shall not
be eligible for the incentive until after having spent one
(1) year with the City within the fire department. Except
that, an employee with an appropriate current certification,
or in training for the certifications, at the time of
employment in the fire department, shall be eligible if
required by the City to perform as an EMT -II.
17.3 The City may require any employee to attend EMT -II training.
17.4 Employees who have voluntarily received EMT -II certifi-
cation training on City time and at City expense, shall
reimburse City training costs (tuition, books, materials) at
time of separation as provided below if the employee leaves
within 36 months following certification:
Leave
within
6
months
100%
Leave
within
12
months
75%
Leave
within
24
months
50%
Leave
within
36
months
25%
ARTICLE 18 OVERTIME
18.1 Overtime is defined as all hours worked in excess 114 hours
worked in a 15 day work period.
18.2 Overtime shall be paid in cash at one and one-half (1-1/2)
times the employee's regular rate of pay.
18.3 Employees required to return to work on a scheduled vacation
day, shall be paid at the rate of 1.5 times their regular
rate of pay for the hours actually worked.
11
18.4 Overtime shall be earned and paid in increments of fifteen
(15) minutes.
ARTICLE 19 CALL -OUT PAY
19.1 It is agreed that the CITY will guarantee a minimum of two
hours pay, computed at straight hourly rates, for any unit
member called back to duty.
19.2 If an employee is called to return to duty, such call -out
shall not be canceled until the employee reports to Station
#1. To be eligible to receive the minimum, the employee
must report to Station #1.
ARTICLE 20 -..UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
The uniform for the Fire Department is a two-piece work uniform,
and two T-shirts, of a style, material and manufacture determined
by the Fire Chief. Two (2) complete uniforms will be provided
upon initial employment with the Fire Department and replacements
provided are on an "as needed basis" as determined by the Fire
Chief and approved by the City Administrator. The CITY will
provide safety footgear of a type, style and manufacture as
recommended by the Fire Chief and approved by the City
administrator. CITY is responsible for normal upkeep, i.e.,
heels and soles, with replacement as determined by the Fire
Chief.
ARTICLE 21 -_RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The CITY agrees to provide employees in this unit with a
retirement benefit program through the Public Employees
Retirement System (PERS) as follows:
1 July 1988 - continue current 1/2 at 55 plan with basic
1959 Survivor Benefit Clause;
1 July 1989 - implement 2% at 50 plan with 3rd level 1959
Survivor Benefit, (Section 21382.4) and
also the Sick Leave Credit option
(Section 20862.8)
1 July 1991 - implement Highest Single Year Compensation
(Section 20024.2)
ARTICLE 22 - MILEAGE
CITY will pay $.20 per mile as reimbursement to members of the
Unit for all mileage they incur when on official business,
provided there is no CITY car or other pool car available for the
CITY business.
ARTICLE 23 - HEALTH AND SAFETY ARTICLE
23.1 Management shall provide and maintain safe and healthy work
facilities and equipment.
12
23.2 Safety and health conditions
Morro Bay are subject to the
legislation which regulates
safety conditions of the work
23.3
A Citywide Safety/Loss Contro
lished and shall review acci
deficiencies, and recommend
equipment. The MBFF may appoi
serve on the committee. If t
designated employee's normal
shall receive paid release time
in employment in the City of
Provisions of State and Federal
the health environment and
place.
d
1 Committee shall be estab-
ents, review alleged safety
safety training and safety
nt one unit representative to
he committee meets during the
working hours, the employee
to attend the meeting.
23.4 If an employee becomes alerted to an unsafe condition or
health hazard, he/she shall report such condition to his/her
immediate supervisor. If such conditions cannot be
satisfactorily remedied by the immediate supervisor, an
employee has the right to submit the matter either
personally or through the steward to his/her Department Head
or designated safety representative. On any matter of
safety not resolved, after proceeding through the above
process, consultation will take place between management and
the MBFF if requested.
23.5
23
23
A first aid kit sha
facilities readily
employees.
11 be furnished a
and conveniently
Management agrees to provide
potentially toxic agents or
medical services at no cost
nd maintained at work
accessible to unit
to employees who are exposed to
toxic materials the appropriate
.o the employee.
Any safety equipment required by the CITY shall be furnished
by the CITY.
ARTICLE 24 -.PROCESSING OF FORMAL GRIEVANCES
24.1.1 The MBFF agrees that whenever investigation or
processing of a grievance is to be transacted during
working hours, only the amount of time necessary to
bring about a prompt disposition of the matter will be
utilized. It is further agreed that the time spent on
an investigation and processing of grievances will not
interfere with the normal operation of the department.
CITY agrees to provide every reasonable amount of time
for the investigation and the processing of a
grievance, but by so agreeing does not imply that the
processing or investigation of a grievance shall take
priority over normal functions of the department.
24.1.2
CITY further agrees that any payment of overtime
arising because of MBFF personnel's involvement in
grievance investigation or processing shall not be
13
authorized. Time spent on the investigation and
Processing of grievances will be recorded on a form
provided by CITY. Stewards will be permitted
reasonable time -off with pay for the investigation and
processing of grievances provided, however, that
stewards shall first obtain permission from the
department head and/or his/her designee and inform
him/her of the nature of his/her business. CITY shall
grant such permission promptly unless such absence
would cause an undue interruption of work or would
require the CITY to pay overtime in order to maintain
the normal operation of the department.
24.1.3 Upon entering the work location, the steward shall
inform the department head and supervisor of the nature
of his/her business. Permission to leave a job will be
granted to the employee involved unless such absence
would cause an interruption of work. If the employee
cannot be made available, the steward will seek an
alternate time for employee availability with the
department head or supervisor.
24.1.4 It is agreed that in some instances the investigation
and processing of a grievance may be accomplished on
the employee's time. This agreement is in recognition
of the mutual sharing of costs involved in the handling
of employee -initiated actions.
24.2 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
The primary purpose of this procedure shall be to provide a
means whereby an employee, without jeopardizing his
employment, can express a personal grievance relating to his
wages, hours of work, and working conditions, and obtain a
fair and equitable disposition of his grievance.
24.2.1 DEFINITION OF INFORMAL GRIEVANCE
An informal grievance is defined as a verbal
disagreement by an employee expressed to his supervisor
with a request to informally discuss the grievance with
the supervisor and/or the department head.
24.2.2 DEFINITION OF FORMAL GRIEVANCE
A formal grievance shall be defined as any written
complaint of an employee filed with his immediate
supervisor within thirty (30) days of the subject of
the grievance relating to his wages, hours of work, and
working conditions.
14
24.2.3 INFORMAL DISCUSSION WITH SUPERVISOR
An employee shall first pursue all informal grievances
with his supervisors and at any time that the employee
or the supervisor or department head deem that the
informal grievance is a formal grievance, the employee
may reduce it to a formal written grievance. An
employee with an informal grievance is encouraged first
to attempt to resolve the problem by discussing it
informally with his first -line supervisor before filing
a written grievance.
24.2.4 FORMAL CONFERENCE WITH SUPERVISOR
If an employee does not obtain satisfaction of his
informal grievance by means of an informal discussion
with his supervisor, or if he is unable to communicate
with his supervisor, he and/or his representative may,
by written grievance, request and shall be accorded a
formal conference within ten (10) days with the
supervisor and/or department head. The decision of the
supervisor shall be reported to the employee and/or his
representative within five (5) business days of the
date the conference was held with the supervisor.
24.2.5 DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW
In the event the employee does not obtain satisfaction
at any level of review by means of informal or formal
grievance and a formal conference with his supervisors,
he and/or his representative may submit the grievance
in writing to the supervisor or department head. The
procedure to be followed by the supervisor who receives
a grievance in writing shall be established by each
department head for his department, and shall include
review of the grievance by the immediate supervisor and
such successively higher levels of management as may be
determined by the department head. A cumulative record
of the decision and the reason for the decision at each
level of review shall be maintained. The ultimate
decision shall be that of the department head. The
decision must be reported to the employee in writing
within ten (10) business days of the date that the
request for departmental review was submitted to the
supervisor.
24.2.6 APPEAL TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR
In the event the employee does not obtain satisfaction
by means of the departmental review, he and/or his
representative shall submit the grievance in writing to
the City Administrator within ten (10) days after
notification of the departmental decision is given to
the employee. The City Administrator may meet with the
15
employee and/or his representative and the department
head before making a decision; or may waive
administrative review and refer the grievance directly
to a committee of the City Council appointed to hear
grievances. A copy of his decision on the matter must
be presented to the employee within ten (10) business
days of the date the grievance was filed with the City
Administrator.
24.2.7 SUBMISSION TO A COMMITTEE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
In the event that the employee does not obtain
satisfaction by means of the administrative process
outlined above, he may request a hearing by a committee
of the City Council. The hearing shall be held by the
committee within fifteen (15) business days of the date
of receipt of the request at the convenience of all
parties, unless waived by common consent of the
employee and the department head. The hearing shall be
informal. The employee and/or his representative, the
department head and/or the City Administrator shall
appear before the committee to present facts pertinent
to the case. The burden of proof shall rest with the
employee. The committee shall limit its review of the
grievance procedure and shall make its decision within
thirty (30) days after the termination of the hearing
unless a reasonable time extension is deemed necessary
and all parties are notified.
24.2.8 TIME LIMITS
In the case the time limits outlined above are not
observed by the representative of the City, the
employee and/or his representative shall have the right
to carry the grievance directly to the next high level
of review.
24.3 GROUP GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
The recognized employee organizations may present a general
grievance (affecting several employees) in writing directly
to the City Administrator within thirty (30) days of the
subject of the grievance relating to wages, hours of work,
and working conditions. Upon receipt of such a grievance,
the City Administrator shall establish a time for a hearing,
at which time all affected parties may appear before the
City Administrator to present facts pertinent to the issue.
The decision of the City Administrator shall be presented to
all parties concerned within fifteen (15) business days and
shall be appealable by the group to a committee of the City
Council for its findings and recommendations within thirty
(30) days. If either party wishes to appeal, it may file an
appeal with the City Council as a whole within five (5)
16
working days of the final decision of the committee of the
City Council.
ARTICLE 25 - NO STRIKE, NO LOCK -OUT
25.1 During the life of this agreement, the City will not lock
out any employees nor will the MBFF cause, authorize, advise
or encourage any interruption of work or any other concerted
action. The term "interruption of work" shall mean any work
stoppage or strike (including economic and unfair labor
practice strikes) or any intentional slow down of work. The
term "other concerted action" includes picketing or boycott
activities by the MBFF.
25.2 There shall be no refusal to work on, handle or produce any
materials or equipment because of a labor dispute.
25.3 Any employee engaging in any action prohibited by this
Article shall be subject to immediate discharge or such
other discipline as the CITY may assess. Such discharge or
discipline shall not be reviewable through the Grievance
Procedure.
ARTICLE 26 - SEVERABILITY
If any provision(s) are held to be contrary to law by a court of
competent jurisdiction, such provisions will not be deemed valid
and subsisting except to the extend permitted by law, but all
other provisions will continue in full force and effect.
ARTICLE 27 - FULL UNDERSTANDING MODIFICATION WAIVER
27.1 This Agreement sets forth the full and entire understanding
of the parties regarding the matters set forth herein, and
any other prior or existing understanding or agreements by
the parties, whether formal or informal, regarding any such
matters are hereby superseded or terminated in their
entirety.
27.2 It is agreed and understood that each party hereto
voluntarily and unqualifiedly waives its right to negotiate,
and agrees that the other party shall not be required to
negotiate, with respect to any matter covered herein.
27.3 No agreement, alteration, understanding, variation, waiver,
or modification of any of the terms or provisions contained
herein shall in any manner be binding upon the parties
hereto unless made and executed in writing by all parties
hereto, and if required, approved by the CITY and ratified
by the membership of the ASSOCIATION.
27.4 The waiver of any breach of any term, or condition of this
Agreement by either party shall not constitute a precedent
in the future enforcement of all its terms and provisions.
17
•
ARTICLE 28 - WORKING OUT -OF -CLASS
28.1 Employees. may be worked on an out -of -class assignment only
as provided in the Personnel Rules and Regulations of the
City of Morro B_y, except as provided herein b`.
28.2 Employees shall receive an additional 5$ compensation for
out -of -class assignments that exceed 15 consecutive calendar
days. Such additional 5% shall start on the 16th day retro-
active to the first day of the out -of -class assignment.
Such additional compensation shall be paid during the first
six (6) months of the out -of -class assignment.
28.3 If the assignment is extended by 6 months, then starting on
the first day of the extension:
28.3.1 the employee shall continue to receive the 5%
compensation if the out -of -class assignment is required
to fill an absence due to an employee who is out on
4850 leave.
28.3.2 the employee shall receive an additional 5% for a total
of 10% additional compensation if the out -of -class
assignment is required to fill a vacant position.
28.4 An employee placed in an out -of -class assignment will not be
taken off that assignment for the sole purpose of avoiding
the payment provided above.
28.5 Whenever possible, City intends to fill vacancies with
qualified employees.
ARTICLE 29 - ELIMINATION OF FIRE SERVICE
If the fire service function of the City of Morro Bay is merged
into another agency, or if another agency assumes said function,
then prior to such action, the City shall meet and confer with
MBFF concerning the affects of such action.
"n
MORRO �BAAYFI`REeFIGE
S
BY:vA�
Stan Thomas
BY:
Fred Harpster /
Mike Pond
a= - - /yq'8l
Date SigfMd
SIGNATURES
CITY OF MORRO BAY
BY:
S
BY: w V \y� """'k;, �
Forrest Henderson
BY: ,/" art[ Pi p�
Bernie Zerr
XU,4/-c ZZ, /f&S
Date Signed
19
Side Letter
Between
City of Morro Bay
and
Morro Bay Fire Fighters
FIRE PREVENTION SPECIALIST TRANSFER POLICY
It shall be the intent of the parties to provide an
opportunity for transfer between the classes of Fire
Prevention Specialist and Fire Engineer if adequate coverage
is maintained. The following provisions will serve as
guidelines:
1) Participants must be in the class of Fire Engineer
and Fire Prevention Specialist.
2) Transfers shall be voluntary by mutual agreement
between the individual participants subject to
approval of the Fire Chief.
3) Participants shall be adequately trained and
qualified as determined by the Fire Chief.
4) Transfers shall be for a period of two years and
may be extended by mutual agreement and approval
of the Fire Chief.
5) The Fire Prevention Specialist incumbent shall
retain primary responsibility for that function
and may be subject to reassignment to the Fire
Prevention Specialist duties if the assignment is
vacated due to long term absence or separation.
Individuals interested in participating in a transfer shall
make inquiry with the Fire Chief. This side letter shall be
included in the transfer agreement between the participants
and the Fire chief.
Dated: /
ri3—•Z,��Q `� a,f
RESOLUTION NO. 66-88
RESOLUTION ORDERING PLACED ON THE BALLOT OF
THE NEXT CITY ELECTION INITIATIVE MEASURES
TO PROHIBIT A GAZEBO IN MORRO BAY "CITY PARK,
AND TO REZONE "PINEY WAY VILLAGE" PROPERTY
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, two initiative petitions were presented to the City
Clerk on May 20, 1988: 1) to prohibit placing a gazebo in Morro
Bay "City" Park and to require any gazebo in "City" Park removed;
and 2) to rezone the "Piney Way Village" property from R-2 Multi -
Family Residential to C-1 District Commercial; and
WHEREAS, said initiative petitions have been examined by the
City Clerk's Office and certified as being sufficient in accor-
dance with Section 4011 of the Elections Code, qualifying the
initiative petitions to be submitted to the voters of the City of
Morro Bay at the next general municipal election to be held on
November 8, 1988; and
WHEREAS, the Morro Bay City Council did, by Resolution No.
43-88, call said general municipal election and requested the
County Board of Supervisors to approve consolidation of the elec-
tion with the statewide election to be held on the same day.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. The City Council, pursuant to its authority in accor-
dance with the Elections Code, does hereby determine there shall
be and is hereby ordered submitted to the qualified electors of
said City at said regular general municipal election the follow-
ing questions:
Shall an Ordinance be enacted to prohibit
placing a gazebo in Morro Bay "City" Park and
to require any gazebo in Morro Bay "City"
Park removed?
YES
NO
Shall an Ordinance be enacted to rezone the
"Piney Way Village" Property from R-2 Multi -
Family Residential to C-1 District Commer-
cial?
YES
NO / /
Resolution No. 66-88
Page Two
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to forward a copy of
this Resolution to the County Clerk for inclusion in the ballot
for the November 8, 1988 general municipal election.
3. Each initiative measure shall pass individually only if
a majority of the votes cast by voters voting on each measure are
"yes" votes and shall, if passed, take precedence over any other
conflicting measure receiving less votes in this election.
4. The City Council hereby directs the City Attorney to
prepare an impartial written analysis of each measure, not to ex-
ceed 500 words in length, showing the effect of each measure on
existing law and the operation of the measure.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Morro Bay City Council at a regu-
lar meeting thereof held on the 27th day of June, 1988 on the
following vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
-- ALE REDDELL, Mayor
ATTEST:
i
�
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
CERTIFICATION
I, ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk of the City of Morro Bay do
hereby declare that the initiative petition presented to the
City of Morro Bay on May 20, 1988 to prohibit placing a
gazebo in Morro Bay "City" Park and to require any gazebo in
Morro Bay "City" Park removed, was examined in accordance
with Section 4009 of the Elections Code, and is hereby
determined to be sufficient.
DATED: June 13, 1988
A�DA� S, City Clerk
City of Morro Bay, California
CERTIFICATION
I, ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk of the City of Morro Bay do
hereby declare that the initiative petition presented to the
City of Morro Bay on May 20, 1988 to rezone the "Piney Way
Village" property from R-2 Multi -Family Residential to C-1
District Commercial, was examined in accordance with Section
4009 of the Elections Code, and is hereby determined to be
sufficient.
DATED: June 13, 1988
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
City of Morro Bay, California
RESOLUTION NO. 65-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MORRO BAY, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO
THE CLASSIFICATION, COMPENSATION, AND
TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT OF EXECUTIVE
EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY
THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of the California
Government Code Sections 3500 et. sequ. and Resolution 74-69 of
the City of Morro Bay the City's representatives have met and
conferred in good faith pertaining to the subject of wages,
benefits, and conditions of employment for executive employees of
the City; and
WHEREAS, the meeting between the executive employees and the
City had resulted in a mutual agreement and understanding to
recommend that the executive employees accept all of the terms
and conditions as set forth in an Agreement for Professional
Services and attached and made a part of this resolution
herewith; and
WHEREAS, the City now desires to provide said salary
increases and change in benefits to said executive employees of
the City of Morro Bay;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Morro Bay City
Council does hereby approve and adopt in full the Agreement for
Professional Services as attached and made a part of this
resolution herewith.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of Morro Bay at a
regular meeting thereof held this 27th day of June 1988, by the
following roll call vote.
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Dale Reddell, Mayor
ATTEST:
Ardith Davis, City Clerk
•. •
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EXECUTIVE PERSONNEL
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of
19 , by and between the CITY OF MORRO BAY,
State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called the
"CITY," as party of the first part, and
hereinafter called "employee," as party of the second part, both of
whom understand as follows:
WHEREAS, the CITY desires to employ the services of said EMPLOYEE as
of the CITY as provided by the Municipal Code of Ordinances of the
City of Morro Bay; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to provide certain
benefits, establish certain conditions of employment, and to set forth
conditions of said EMPLOYEE; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Administrator to:
1. secure and obtain the services of EMPLOYEE, and to provide
inducement for him/her to remain in such employment;
2. to make possible full work productivity by assuring EMPLOYEE's
morale and peace of mind with respect to future security; and
3. to provide a just means for terminating EMPLOYEE's services at
such time as he/she may be unable to fully discharge his/her
duties due to age or disability or when CITY may desire to
otherwise terminate his/her employ; and
WHEREAS, EMPLOYEE desires to accept employment as
of said CITY;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein
contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
SECTION 1. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
CITY hereby agrees to employ said EMPLOYEE as
of said CITY to perform the
functions and duties specified in said Municipal Code of Ordinances,
and to perform such other legally permissible and proper duties and
functions as the City Administrator shall from time to time assign.
SECTION 2. TERM
a. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent, limit, or otherwise
interfere with the right of the City Administrator to terminate the
it
services of EMPLOYEE at any time, subject only to the provisions set
forth in Section 3, paragraphs (a), (b), and (d) of this Agreement.
b. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent, limit, or otherwise
interfere with the right of the EMPLOYEE to resign at any time from
his/her position with CITY, subject only to the provisions set forth
in Section 3, paragraph (c) of this Agreement.
C. EMPLOYEE agrees to remain in the exclusive employ of CITY until
the day of 19 provided, however,
that the term "exclusive employ" shall not prohibit part-time
employment which the EMPLOYEE might desire to accept with appropriate
prior knowledge and written approval of the City Administrator. Such
part-time employment shall not in anyway conflict in time or interest
with the EMPLOYEE's responsibilities to the CITY. Unless exceptional
circumstances exist, such part-time employment shall not exceed ten
hours per week.
d. In the event written notice is not given by either party to this
Agreement to the other thirty (30) days prior to the termination date
as hereinafter provided, this Agreement shall be extended on the same
terms and conditions as herein provided on a month -to -month basis in
all respects, and in all provisions hereof until EMPLOYEE is
terminated in accordance with Section 3, or a new Agreement is
negotiated and executed.
e. The terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement shall remain
in effect until 30 June 1992.
SECTION 3. TERMINATION AND SEVERANCE PAY
a. In the event EMPLOYEE is terminated by the City Administrator
before expiration of the aforesaid term of employment, and during such
time that EMPLOYEE is willing and able to perform the duties of
then, and in
that event, the CITY agrees to pay EMPLOYEE a lump sum cash payment
equal to two (2) months current salary; provided, however, that in the
event EMPLOYEE is terminated for cause by the City Administrator,
then, and in that event, CITY shall have no obligation to pay the
severance sum designated in this paragraph.
b. In the event CITY at any time during the employment term reduces
the salary or financial benefits of EMPLOYEE in a greater percentage
than an applicable across-the-board reduction for all CITY employees,
or in the event the CITY refuses, following written notice, to comply
with any other provision benefiting EMPLOYEE herein, then and in that
event EMPLOYEE may at his/her option, be deemed to be "terminated" at
the date of such reduction, or such refusal to comply within the
meaning and context of the herein severance pay provision. All pay
raises for executive employees shall be based on merit and approved by
Council on the recommendation of the City Administrator. The failure
to grant EMPLOYEE a pay raise above the amount specified in Section 4
shall not be considered a termination action under Section 3 (a).
2
C. In the event EMPLOYEE voluntarily resigns his/her position with
the CITY before expiration of the aforesaid term of employment, the
EMPLOYEE shall give the CITY 30 days written notice in advance.
d. The City Administrator has the sole authority to appoint and
terminate said EMPLOYEE in the City of Morro Bay. This is to insure
continuity of service and proper chain of command in the personnel
process. In the event the present City Administrator separates from
employment with the City of Morro Bay and a new acting and/or
permanent City Administrator is appointed in his place, said City
Administrator shall not remove EMPLOYEE for a period of 90 days
following the administrator's appointment. This provision is to give
the City Administrator time to acquaint himself/herself with the
ability and competence of said EMPLOYEE prior to any action to
terminate said EMPLOYEE.
SECTION 4. SALARY
The CITY agrees to pay EMPLOYEE for his/her services rendered pursuant
hereto an annual base salary of $ effective
payable in installments at the same time as other employees of the
CITY are paid.
In addition CITY agrees to increase said base salary as outlined
below:
YEAR
1 July 1988
1 July 1989
1 July 1990
1 July 1991
and/or other benefits of
extent as the City Council
on the basis of an annual
the recommendation of the
of said EMPLOYEE.
SECTION 5. HOURS OF WORK
INCREASE
5%
5%
5%
5%
EMPLOYEE in such amounts and to such an
may determine that it is desirable to do so
salary review of said EMPLOYEE, based upon
City Administrator and performance appraisal
a. It is recognized that EMPLOYEE must devote a great deal of
his/her time outside normal office hours without benefit of paid
overtime to conduct CITY business, and to that end EMPLOYEE will be
allowed to take administrative leave as he/she shall deem appropriate
during said normal office hours with the approval of the City
Administrator.
b. EMPLOYEE may with written advance approval of the City
Administrator, take up to forty-eight hours administrative leave
during any fiscal year.
C. The City Administrator may, due to exceptional and documented
circumstances grant administrative leave in excess of the forty-eight
hours specified in Section 5 (b).
3
d. Normally, carry-over of unused administrative leave into the next
fiscal year will not be permitted, without special approval by the
City Administrator.
SECTION 6. TRANSPORTATION
a. An employee who is designated to be available and respond to
emergencies shall have the exclusive use at all times during his/her
employment with the CITY of a radio -equipped automobile. The use of
such automobile is restricted to travel between the EMPLOYEE's home
and the job site, to and from business -related meetings, conferences,
and inspections within the CITY limits and, to and from business -
related conferences, meetings, and conventions outside the CITY
limits. During vacations or extended absences, EMPLOYEE is to make
the automobile available for other business -related uses by parking
the vehicle at the job site.
b. An alternate to providing an automobile for EMPLOYEE is to have
the use of an automobile from the CITY's pool fleet for business
purposes of any kind. EMPLOYEE may use any available vehicle for
official use during regular business hours or evenings when attending
to any business activity involving his/her duties and
responsibilities.
C. An EMPLOYEE who is not provided with a CITY vehicle will be
reimbursed for use of his/her personal vehicle at the per mile rate
approved by the I.R.S. for reimbursement for use of personal vehicle
for work related business. No reimbursement will be made for routine
home to office transportation during normal office hours.
SECTION 7. DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS
CITY agrees to pay the professional dues and subscriptions of EMPLOYEE
necessary for their continuation and full participation in national,
regional, state and local associations and organizations necessary and
desirable for their continued professional participation, growth, and
advancement and for the good of the CITY in accordance with approved
budgetary limitations.
SECTION 8. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
a. CITY hereby agrees to pay the travel and subsistence expenses of
EMPLOYEE for professional and official travel, meetings, and occasions
adequate to continue the professional development of EMPLOYEE, and to
adequately pursue necessary official and other functions for CITY, in
accordance with approved budgetary limitations.
b. CITY also agrees to pay for the travel and subsistence expenses
of EMPLOYEE for short courses, institutes and seminars that are
necessary for professional development and for the good of the CITY,
in accordance with approved budgetary limitations.
Cd
SECTION 9. EXECUTIVE EXPENSES
CITY recognizes that certain expenses of a nonpersonal and job
affiliated nature are incurred by EMPLOYEE and hereby agrees to
reimburse such expenses upon presentation of a receipt and submission
of the appropriate confirming purchase requisition to the City Finance
Department and the City Administrator, providing such expenditure was
approved by the City Administrator.
SECTION 10. BENEFITS
a. Retirement
EMPLOYEE shall be covered by the State of California Public Employee
Retirement System. CITY shall pay seven percent of EMPLOYEE's legally
required percentage of salary, and EMPLOYEE shall pay any remaining
percentage. CITY shall continue to pay its legally required
percentage of EMPLOYEE's salary.
CITY agrees to provide employee with a retirement benefit program
similar to PERS benefits granted to similarly situated PERS qualified
employees in other City classifications. CITY agrees to implement
these benefits on the same time schedule as it does for those other
classifications.
b. ICMA Deferred Compensation Program
EMPLOYEE shall have the option to participate in the ICMA Deferred
Compensation Program. CITY shall execute the Deferred Compensation
Employment Agreement if EMPLOYEE chooses to participate in said
program and shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the 1978
Revenue Act and Section 457 of the Internal Revenue Code. The maximum
amount EMPLOYEE shall be entitled to defer is 25 percent of their
compensation or $7,500, whichever is less.
c. Paid Vacation Leave
1. CITY agrees EMPLOYEE shall accrue paid vacation leave at the
following rate:
Service Years Vacation Days
0 - 2 12
2 - 4 14
4 - 6 16
6 - 8 18
8 - 10 20
Employee shall be entitled to unlimited accrual of unused vacation
leave, with the employee's option of 100% pay off at time of
separation.
2. EMPLOYEE shall have the option of converting up to five (5) days
of accrued vacation leave into cash each fiscal year.
9
3. EMPLOYEE shall accrue one (1) day paid sick leave per month.
EMPLOYEE shall be entitled to receive cash payment for up to 50% of
unused sick leave upon termination of employment provided that the
maximum amount CITY shall pay shall not exceed $4,500. EMPLOYEE is
entitled to payment for unused sick leave payment upon resignation
only if 30 days written notice of intent to terminate is given CITY in
accordance with Section 3 (c) of this contract.
d. Health Insurance Coverage
1. CITY agrees to provide health insurance and to pay 100% of the
monthly premium for EMPLOYEE and his/her eligible dependent(s) to be
covered under the CITY's medical and dental insurance program, and the
benefits thereof.
2. EMPLOYEE agrees to submit annually to a complete physical
examination by a qualified physician selected by the CITY, the cost
and scope of which will be determined and paid by CITY. If the CITY
chooses not to budget for this cost, the requirement for a physical
examination shall terminate.
e. Life Insurance
CITY agrees to provide group term life insurance coverage for EMPLOYEE
and his/her eligible dependent(s) in amount determined by CITY; but,
in no case shall the face value of the life insurance provided by CITY
be less than $20,000 on EMPLOYEE and $1,000 on eligible dependent(s).
Monthly premiums will be paid 100% by CITY; EMPLOYEE may elect for
increased group life insurance coverage by paying additional premium.
f. Disability Insurance
CITY agrees to provide and pay 100% of the cost for a long-term
disability program for EMPLOYEE, said coverage having at maximum a 90-
day wait period and providing disability payments of 60% of monthly
salary up to $2,500 per month to age 65 under condition of selected
plan.
g. Other Employment Benefits
1. All provisions of the Municipal Code
relating to benefits and work conditions as
specified or excepted in this agreement, or
amended, also shall apply to EMPLOYEE as they
of CITY.
and resolution of CITY
they now exist, unless
as hereinafter may be
would do other employees
N
0
2. Based upon individual utilization of paid sick leave in the
preceding fiscal year, EMPLOYEE may convert unused accumulated sick
leave into paid vacation leave once during the following fiscal year,
pursuant to the formula below:
Maximum Conversion
Sick Leave Utilization Sick Leave into vacation Leave
0
hours
96
hours
48
hours
8
hours
or less
72
hours
36
hours
16
hours
or less
48
hours
24
hours
24
hours
or less
24
hours
12
hours
25
hours
or more
0
0
SECTION 11. GENERAL PROVISIONS
a. The text herein and attachments hereto shall constitute the
entire Agreement between the parties.
b. This Agreement shall be binding upon and insure to the benefit of
the heirs -at -law and executors of EMPLOYEE.
C. This Agreement shall become effective commencing the day
of , 19 ; and shall terminate, subject to the
provisions of Section 2 (d), on the day of
19
d. If any provision, or any portion thereof, contained in this
Agreement is held to be unconstitutional, invalid, or unenforceable,
the remainder of this Agreement or portion thereof shall be deemed
severable, shall not be affected and shall remain in full force and
effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Morro Bay, State of California, has
caused this Agreement to be signed and executed in its behalf by its
Administrator, and duly attested to by its City Clerk, and the
Employee has signed and executed this Agreement the day and year first
above written.
Employee
CITY OF MORRO BAY
City Administrator
7
RESOLUTION NO. 64-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY
ADOPTING A BUDGET AND MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1988-89
THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay is required to appropriate and
expend public funds to conduct its business activities on a
day-to-day basis; and
WHEREAS, the City Council and City Staff have expended many
hours preparing and reviewing the City's needs; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that the
efficiency, economy and effectiveness of City government operations
would be substantially impaired if such appropriation expenditures
could not be incurred or paid on a daily basis; and
WHEREAS, Section 37208 of the California Government Code
provides that payments or demands conforming to a budget approved
by ordinance or resolution need not be audited by the City Council
prior to payment; and
WHEREAS, City Council acknowledges the continuing efforts of
Staff to operate within an approved budget and manage savings
wherever feasible; and
WHEREAS, City Council wishes to encourage these practices by
implementing a departmental savings sharing program; and
WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the California Constitution
establishes a limitation on appropriations of funds by the City; an
WHEREAS, the City staff has calculated the appropriations
limit in accordance with the provisions of Article XIII B of the
California Constitution;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. The 1988-89 Manager's Recommended Budget is adopted with
the changes ordered by the City Council as illustrated in Exhibit
A; and
2. Staff is directed to prepare and publish a final budget
document incorporating all the aforementioned changes and all
changes resulting from Council approved salary and benefit
adjustments; and
Resolution No. 64-88
Page Two
3. The City Administrator is authorized to transfer
appropriations anywhere within the adopted budget as long as the
bottom line appropriations are not exceeded. Otherwise,
appropriation control is intended to be at the division bottom line
for operations and the project bottom line for capital projects
with administrative approval.
4. The appropriations limit is established for fiscal year
1988-89 at $6,031,554 from proceeds of taxes. This budget
authorizes appropriations from tax proceeds of $4,659,187 and is
therefore $1,372,367 under the limitation.
5. Fifty percent of all savings achieved in the Departmental
Operating Budgets will be returned to the department generating the
savings for use in Fiscal Year 1988-89. These funds can be used
for any non -recurring expense approved by the City Administrator.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Morro
Bay at a regular meeting held thereof on June 27, 1988, by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
DALE REDDELL, Mayor
ATTEST:
AEWITH DAVIS, City Clerk
1 n 1 OZ• rnm tfnHro ro n•11ronn 71 ,k1 'F1 x1 A,ro '+7 ro n < mp.n
I a I'000wmmw1,MMItr-r-000mm0mmmY-m1-• On m mo1<
11- I m a n n E E R n w 0 04" Ir 3 3 0 0 0 m m 0 a H rt G w a 1 m
1 I r l m m m m "'0 v m Y• a N •< w a rt c m rt o
I O I wogK 0on r 0r.c I I I I I 1 00 a Or• m to M
I 1 Rm "H Rr-33 m N a 0 a 7wr•a vl
I m l r-•O nH N RR IT a N Y.ron ro0 NY m a R N 1-10 3
1 M l aa wv Olt am r•R we w0roa mrt0 O
1 w 1 W M a r m M 0 14 tl F' 0 0 1- 0 H p1 I"I
I rt 1 rt< F+w I I m a 7Crt P.
H Y H a % w n
I r 1 n9 m a ON Crr•Ra a R a It0
1 a 1 0 m w 0 <mm m nr-N N P. mr• m 1<
IIo I aa0 Rm mCm < a1, N •<0 a m
1 I rtrta r•a nr m P. rt a m w
1 I w w It O rt P. Ir m 0 It 0 1<
Iona a 091 O Na w
N IO m O
0 N a 7
1 IW R
m
1 1 N
1 W 1 IJ A L7
I N I N F+ 01 H N V IJ H 1� Y O m
1 N I OIIII NN NN JAIpN HIpNVIAOa H Ma
I N I OJ NNI-•VIIIIWI00WJ NI-'U1F+JON Y cm
1 A I Om mWOAAJJNIOaJIDOmJaNO Y FI
1 F• I Om mNONOONAA0IJOIAWOWIOW In aw
I O I Or' NIOOmAOAHNmONNIIIV JAN O 1-'
I I
I 1 r h7 w
I 1 v1 C M
o ax
ioi o am
I I
1 I H
INI N N H
I N l a YIO W I+N m C a
1 OI O Ow O 1"P m aN
I NIO Om N w0 ID aY
I J 1 0 1+ 0 O w J Y R
I 1
i m i a �• r• u ••1 H LI
I A I In N A VI VI 1� o c w w
l a l o IO OmWN vl % N
I W l o N IO W N W o a
I JIO IO AWWW O
0
I r• I
I N I
101
101
Iol
1 1
I I
I I
I I
I J I
Y VI
I IO I N
NJ
I Y 1 0
W IO
1 m I o
rin
1 b l o
Inrn
I Y 1 O
IO 01
1
m
N a r• r
p1 Ip O IO IO
Ip OmHN
D WNW VI
N VIJ
N N
O W to a IG
O O m In OI
O I11 W 111 N
o Imam
I J I 1✓ 1-•
1 0 1 O W Y N 01 A N I-• OI I"' N H Y 1-• N V
I O11 bb .ONJAAOWUt Ill 111 JalOa HIO VIm JOIa
I W 1 AF"r•OI W ID1-�NI-'NNY VI UI W 1DO W J lI1 F�m W NON
1 N I OIOYOF'•UI ID IC IIIm WOAAJJU1 lOA J100mA.0A0
1 W I Om mIf IO OI ID IIIO AlI10NOONAAO�J OIAHOOJW
1 N I OHON1001 N ID 1�NIOOmAOaVNmONNO. 1�01-�N
u
G i 0 1 0 O I • a b w
H I rt I rt rt 1 S 0 (A E W y hJ ro ;a v m /�
10 I a 1 a a 1 w w O w rt n r• O w W ao K
<H wt� Dy t M>t tiO n7 T.n Oro yn Oy a SH n H00 rt I
N I m 0 n 1 Oro>'O Gmww H N w n N N O w 7 n O F wm' 00 m0�(D F' ID 10-n
1-0 1 O V ila o nnK ro a li nH H H �N H& 0 MrtO En Grtro 3
1 1 w I H r•I ID nr N n< 0<r•0 a H G :3 O
N I w l rt w 1'W ',OO MD En P, r Xl<a KrtW N N 1 V" H
M I N I F^ N 1 w(D 0& Nw En 00 3n N K (D O
Y• I N I O I N N O rtB rt0 K I -'a rt W N O
0 1 I O ro 1 w (D D m mm (D rt M M 010 w n rt w
r• 1 1 H I n n Pa,O 3 7 3 r• rt 3 z H. 5 0 m 0 w
rt 1 I 0 1 << a G rt O (D n O ]W (D V K
1 I u.1 (D (D nr• ID a 0 O Q n
1 I N 1 K -0 n M (N (D
O I 3 ro rt K n
i i N i p w o n
I I rt O y m
1 I 1
w 1 A I N F+ 1 r` f0D
OI I A I N IJ 1 N O 1115
J I W I N W 1 a W O G fD
J I A I A O I O O O 0 H
A 1 I 0 O 1 O O O Q. Q w
O 1 0 1 0 O I O O O F+
I I 1
1 1 I
c w
.• I 1 I w
o i i i 6 7nc
O 0 1 O I N
I 1 I
lb
I I I y
N I N n
W I N I N I F 7
W 0 1 0 7 N
W I N I N I 91 r•
OI I J I J O I rt
1 1 I
1 I 1 I
A 1 N I a I
m 1 b l 1 m I� I J N I� H 0O
W l a a O I V+ O l)7 G a w
10 I A I A O I 000 a DC N
J I J I J O I O O O
I I I
I I I y
m i i i N a w
0 G M
I I I tj 0 0 M
O ry 4 0
0 101 0l KO
I I I Vl DO
w
ioi of o GMm
1 01 01 o pr•7
o ioi of o aQm
O
ro
I lD I J N I N r+J H a
l>-
W I O I W UI I O 111 G rt w
N I N I N O I 00 ar•n
W I T I OI O I 00 O
01 I A I A O I O O 10
I 1 1
I 1 1 n
I 1 1 w E
N 1 0 1 111 UI 1 O ON G Y'rt
O I O I O O I 0 0 0 7 rt w
o lolo 01 00o aan
0 1010 01 00o r
1 i O�1 I b J I UI G N E
A I A I I� W I aJW WOI 7 rtw
1D 1 b I OI N I mF•N O O P. r"H
O� I O� 1 10 J I J lJl N O O a
OI 1 OI I I� N 1 trO O O O O
1 I 1
w In
n
oQ
o r H-E
ioi of o Wortin
O 1 0 1 0 1 O F+
1 I I
1 I I
i l OAi N I r MID
In I w I J OI I NNOI G H
w 1 01 O 01 000 110
J I W I W O I O O O H
1 I I
1 I I M
1 7
N W I W G G
lb
N I A I A 7 H
O 0 1 0 0
O 1 0 1 0 O I O
1 I I w
1 1 I
1 1 1
J I J y
I J 1 0
W I Y I W J I NNOI AJW WUl ONOOIII VIOUI O UI W O a
�D I O I N J I OOVI mIJN 00 00000 000 O O O O 1�
w 1 0 1 W J I 0 0 0 J VI Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O
A I J I N OI 1 000 V100 00 00000 00000 O O O
Exhibit B
CITY OF MORRO.BAY
ARTICLE XIII B
(Proposition 4)
APPROPRIATION LIMITATION DOCUMENT
FISCAL YEAR 1988-89
PREPARED BY:
Louise Burt, Finance Director
June 1988
CITY OF MORRO BAY
ARTICLE XIII B
(Proposition 4)
APPROPRIATION LIMITATION DOCUMENT
FISCAL YEAR 1988-89
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. STATEMENT OF THE CITY'S APPROPRIATION LIMITATION AND THE
COMPLIANCE TO THE LIMITATION FOR THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR 1
II. STATEMENT OF PERTINENT FACTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
III. REVENUE CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
IV. COST ANALYSIS FOR FEE RELATED SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . 5
V. CALCULATION OF THE LIMITATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
•
E
CITY OF MORRO BAY
ARTICLE XIII B
(Proposition 4)
APPROPRIATION LIMITATION DOCUMENT
FISCAL YEAR 1987-88
I. STATEMENT OF THE CITY'S APPROPRIATION LIMITATION AND THE
COMPLIANCE TO THE LIMITATION FOR THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR
The pertinent accounts and records of the City of Morro Bay were
examined and, as a result, it has been determined that according to
generally accepted requirements the City of Morro Bay's
appropriation limit for the 1988-89 fiscal year as provided for in
Article XIII B of the Constitution of the State of California as
implemented by Chapter 1205, Statutes of 1980, is $6,031,554. It
has been determined that of the City's 1987-88 budgeted
appropriations, contingency and provision for reserves of
$10,022,062, the amount of $4,659,187 is subject to the limitation
and is therefore $1,372,367 under the limitation.
II. STATEMENT OF PERTINENT FACTORS
Article XIII B (Proposition 4) which was approved by the California
electorate November 6, 1979 primarily places a limit on the annual
increase in spending of a local agency. The limitation
fundamentally controls spending which results from tax revenue
resource and any excess of revenue over cost reasonably borne for
regulatory licenses, user charges, and user fees in providing
regulation, product or service and the investment of tax revenue.
Article XIII B became effective July 1, 1980, the first day of the
fiscal year following its adoption.
In developing the spending limitation the following documents were
analyzed and applied where appropriate:
1. Article XIII B, Chapter 1205 of the California State
Constitution.
2. Senate Bill No. 1354 which provides for the implementation
of Article XIII B by defining various terms used in the Article and
by prescribing procedures to be used in implementing specific
provisions of the Article.
3. Uniform Guidelines for the Implementation of Article XIII
B prepared by the League of California Cities.
4. Proposition 4 Procedures Guidelines prepared by the County
Accounting Standards and Procedures Committee.
There are no material jurisdictional, policy or organizational
changes which would warrant adjustments to the City's limitation
pursuant to Section 3 of the Article.
Improvement District No. 6 was not included in the base year since
they are used exclusively for debt service.
The City's limitation has been calculated by using the following
funds in their aggregate amounts:
(a)
General
(f)
Gas tax
(b)
Harbor
(g)
Traffic safety
(c)
Sanitation
(h)
Revenue sharing
(d)
Water
(i)
Insurance fund
(e)
Park fee
(internal service)
The local transportation account is considered to be an "enterprise
fund" as as such is excluded. There was no specific appropriation
providing for a General Fund contribution in fiscal year 1978-79,
the base year.
Revenues from fees and charges were compared to the specific cost
of providing that service in order to determine the extent the
revenues are considered "proceeds of taxes".
There were no identifiable mandated costs for Worker's Compensation
Insurance in the base year 1978-79.
The only mandated cost which could be specifically identified in
the accounting records was $1,239 for unemployment insurance
benefits paid in the base year. The City considers unemployment
insurance as a federal mandate and has adjusted the limitation
accordingly.
A use allowance was applied for the City's buildings, structures
and equipment based upon the sound value; which value was
determined by the Industrial Appraisal Company.
The City recognizes and reserves the right to adjust or change
considerations or amounts contained in this document as changes in
generally accepted requirements may dictate.
FA
III. REVENUE CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE
A. 1978-79 BASE YEAR
Revenue Source
Proceeds
Nonproceeds
Property Taxes
$ 355,544
Other Taxes
746,850
Licenses, Permits and
Franchises
$ 39,206
Fines, Forfeits and
Penalties
28,700
Revenue from Use of Money
and Property
106,047
12,653
Aid from Other Governmental
Agencies
308,776
320
Charges for Current Services
419,802
Other Revenue or Funds
Available
12,248
1,462
Special Gasoline Tax
89,017
Harbor Revenue
207,000
Federal Revenue Sharing
146,915
Fund Balance
1,427,911
1,039,109
TOTAL
$3,046,393
$1,895,167
The total of the 1978-79 proceeds of taxes when increased by the
cost -of -living and population factors isthe appropriation
limitation.
M
E
CITY OF MORRO BAY
REVENUE CLASSIFICATION - PROPOSITION 4
1988-89 BUDGET
Revenue Source Proceeds Nonproceeds
General Fund
Taxes
Licenses and Permits
Fines and Forfeits
Intergovernmental
Charges for Services
Use of Money & Property
Other Revenue
Total General Fund
Special Revenue Funds
Gas Tax Fund
Traffic Safety
Revenue Sharing
Water Fund
Sewer Fund
Harbor Fund
Total Special Revenue Fund
Capital Project Funds
Park Fee
Water Capital
Sewer Capital
Total Capital Projects
Special Assessments
Enterprise Funds - Transit
Internal Service Funds
TOTAL
Add: Fund Balance -Beginning
GRAND TOTAL
$2,930,000
$ 202,000
17,000
375,150
208,700
205,625 29,375
43.300
$3,510,775 $ 500,375
$ 130,500
$ 61,000
10,000
1,011,500
860,000
499.500
$ 130,500 $2,442,000
$ 1,500
75,000
60,000
$ 136,500
$ 208,691
856,100
$3,641,275 $4,143,666
1,017,912 1,219,209
$4,659,187 $5,362,875
Note: In order to complete the process of determining the proceeds
of taxes, Proposition 4 provides that regulatory licenses, user
charges, and user fees be considered proceeds of taxes to the
extent that such charges and fees exceed the costs reasonably borne
by each entity in providing the regulation, product or service. As
4
•
a step in the development of the City's base year statement, the
revenues from regulatory licenses, user charges and user fees were
scheduled and related costs reasonably borne were compared to the
revenues. The costs in all categories were greater than the
revenues and thus there were no proceeds of taxes in this area.
The workpapers for the base year document contain detailed
schedules showing the revenue and cost comparisons.
The total of the 1988-89 adjusted proceeds of taxes are subject to
the appropriation limit; the nonproceeds are not. Whereas the
estimated or budgeted amounts are useful for planning purposes, it
is the actual appropriations made throughout the year which, if
they exceed the limitation, must be returned to the taxpayer. This
has been reviewed for the 1986-87 fiscal year, and showed the City
was $1,705,088 under the limit. The 1987-88 appropriations are
estimated to be well under the limit, and will be reviewed after
the fiscal year end.
IV. COST ANALYSIS FOR FEE RELATED SERVICES
Article XIII B provides that proceeds of taxes which are subject to
the growth limitations include revenues from regulatory licenses,
user charges, and user fees to the extent that those revem.es
exceed the costs reasonably borne by the City in providing the
regulations, product or service. Staff completes a cost study
annually in the preparation of the Master Fee Schedule to ensure
that fees do not exceed cost.
Included in the costs reasonably borne are direct departmental
expenditures and indirect costs allowable. Included in the
indirect costs is a "use allowance" for buildings and equipment.
The allowance is 2 percent of building cost per year (50 year life)
and 6 percent of equipment cost per year (16 year life).
5
V. CALCULATION OF THE LIMITATION
The cost -of -living and population factors used below were
calculated from amounts provided by the State Department of Finance
Limitation Calculation
1978-79 Base Year Proceeds
$3,046,393
x 1979-80
CPI Change
Factor
x 1.1017
x 1979-80
Population
Change Factor
x 1.0138
x 1980-81
CPCI Change
Factor
x 1.1053
x 1980-81
Population
Change Factor
x 1.0026
1980-81 Limitation $3,770,591
x 1981-82
CPCI Change Factor
x
1.0912
x 1981-82
Population
Change Factor
x
1.0139
= 1981-82
Limitation
$4,171,660
x 1982-83
CPI Change
Factor
x
1.0679
x 1982-83
Population
Change
x
1.0204
= 1982-83
Limitation
$4,545,796
x 1983-84
CPCI Change Factor
x
1.0235
x 1983-84
Population
Change
x
1.0181
= 1983-84
Limitation
$4,736,835
x 1984-85
CPI Change
Factor
x
1.0474
x 1984-85
Population
Change Factor
x
1.0175
= 1984-85
Limitation
$5,048,185
x 1985-86
CPI Change
Factor
x
1.0374
x 1985-86
Population
Change Factor
x
1.0162
= 1985-86
Limitation
$5,321,826
x 1986-87
CPI Change
Factor
x
1.0230
x 1986-87
Population
Change Factor
x
1.0148
= 1986-87
Limitation
$5,524,803
x 1987-88
CPI Change
Factor
x
1.0340
(No population change)
x
1.0000
$5,712,646
x 1988-89
CPI Change
Factor
x
1.0393
x 1988-89
Population
Change Factor
x
1.0159
= 1988-89
Limitation
$6,031,554
A
RESOLUTION NO. 63-88
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MONTH -TO -MONTH CONTINUATION
OF THE EXTENSION OF THE DIAL -A -RIDE TRANSIT OPERATIONS AGREEMENT
WITH LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC.
THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay and Cal Coast Charter, Inc.
(CCC) entered into a Dial -A -Ride (DAR) Transit Operations Agreement
on January 9, 1984 retroactive to July 1, 1983 and terminating June
30, 1986; and
WHEREAS, CCC was sold to Laidlaw Transit, Inc. (LTI)
effective January 6, 1986 and the aforesaid Transit Agreement was
transferred to LTI pursuant to Resolution No. 14-86 adopted February
10, 1986 by the City of Morro Bay City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay City Council
determined on May 27 and December 8, 1986 that it was in the
public interest to extend said Transit Agreement pending the results
of the DAR performance audit required by the State of California
Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and review of said results
by City, and unanimously voted to adopt Resolution No. 47-86 and
Resolution No. 123-86, respectively; and
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay City Council determined
on June 22 and December 14, 1987 that it was in the public interest
to continue to extend said Transit Agreement on a month -to -month
basis pending the completion of a Request for Proposals (RFP)
process to select a transit contractor to operate DAR in the future
and unanimously voted to adopt Resolution No. 71-87 and Resolution
No. 132-87, respectively; and
WHEREAS, said RFP process has not been completed due to
factors beyond City's control; and
WHEREAS, the City has received an Urban Mass Transportation
Act (UMTA) Section 8 Planning Grant to update the City's
Transportation Development Plan (TDP), 1988-1993, emphasizing DAR
system evaluation and the development of clear and measurable goals,
objectives, standards, and performance measures and incentives for
DAR operations as well as productivity improvements, marketing plan,
and long-term financial requirements and creative financing
alternatives; and
WHEREAS, said TDP update must be completed by July 31, 1988
pursuant to UMTA Section 8 Grant requirements; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to solicit proposals for
a new DAR Transit Operations Agreement subsequent to the completion
and adoption of said TDP update, the timing of which exceeds the
termination date of June 30, 1988 in the current extension of said
Transit Agreement; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to continue said
extension of said Transit Agreement on a month -to -month basis
pending the conclusion of the aforesaid RFP process; and
WHEREAS, said Transit Agreement provides that City may, upon
mutual consent, extend the Agreement by written notification and may
also upon mutual consent renegotiate said Agreement as allowed by
law; and
WHEREAS, LTI has the management and technical personnel and
other assets necessary to continue the operation of DAR; and
WHEREAS, City desires to retain LTI to operate DAR by
continuing the current extension of said Transit Agreement; and
WHEREAS, LTI desires to provide such transit services to City
for the period of said continued extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay as follows:
1. The extension of the DAR Transit Operations Agreement
is hereby continued effective July 1, 1988, subject to the terms
and conditions of the Continuation of Extension Agreement,
attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by
reference.
2. The City Administrator is hereby authorized to sign all
related documents.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Morro Bay
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27th day of June, 1988 by
the following vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
DALE REDDELL, Mayor
ATTEST:
G
A'RDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
CONTINUATION OF EXTENSION AGREEMENT
DIAL -A -RIDE TRANSIT OPERATIONS
This Agreement is entered into the 27th day of June, 1988, by
and between the City of Morro Bay, hereinafter referred to as
"CITY", and Laidlaw Transit, Inc., hereinafter referred to as
"CONTRACTOR".
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay and Cal Coast Charter, Inc.
(CCC) entered into a Dial -A -Ride (DAR) Transit Operations Agreement
on January 9, 1984 retroactive to July 1, 1983 and terminating June
30, 1986; and
WHEREAS, CCC was sold to Contractor effective January 6,
1986, and the aforesaid Transit Agreement was transferred to Laidlaw
Transit, Inc. pursuant to Resolution No. 14-86 adopted February 10,
1986 by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay City Council determined on May
27 and December 8, 1986 that it was in the public interest to extend
said Transit Agreement pending the results of the DAR performance
audit required by the State of California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans) and review of said results by City, and
voted unanimously to adopt Resolution No. 47-86 and Resolution No.
123-86, respectively; and
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay City Council determined on June
22 and December 14, 1987 that it was in the public interest to
continue to extend said Transit Agreement on a month -to -month basis
pending the completion of a Request for Proposals (RFP) process to
select a transit contractor to operate DAR in the future and
unanimously voted to adopt Resoltuion No. 71-87 and Resolution No.
123-87 respectively; and
WHEREAS, said RFP process has not been completed due to factors
beyond City's control; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to solicit proposals for
a new DAR Transit Operations Agreement subsequent to the completion
and adoption of the City's updated Transportation Development Plan
(TDP), 1988-1993, scheduled to be completed by July 31, 1988, the
timing of which exceeds the termination date of June 30, 1988 in the
current extension of the existing Transit Agreement; and --
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to continue said
extension of said Transit Agreement on a month -to -month basis
pending the conclusion of the aforesaid RFP process; and
WHEREAS, said Transit Agreement provides that City may, upon
mutual consent, extend the agreement by written notification and may
also upon mutual consent renegotiate said Agreement as allowed by
law; and
WHEREAS, Contractor has the management and technical personnel
and other assets necessary to continue the operation of DAR; and
WHEREAS, City desires to retain Contractor to operate DAR by
continuing the current extension of said Transit Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Contractor desires to provide such transit services
to City for the period of said continued extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recital
and convenants and agreements of each of the parties herein set
forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. The DAR Transit Operations Agreement and related Renewals of
Extension Agreement, and continuation thereof, described
hereinabove and incorporated herein by reference, are hereby
continued on a month -to -month basis effective July 1, 1988, and
terminating upon the conclusion of the RFP process described
hereinabove or December 31, 1988, which ever occurs first.
2. All terms and conditions of said Transit Agreement shall
continue in effect for the period of any and all extensions as
described hereinabove, except as otherwise provided herein.
3. The rate per service mile and annual fixed management fee
shall be increased or decreased effective July 1, 1988 based
upon eight -five (85%) of the annual percentage difference in the
All Urban Consumers Priced Index/Los Angeles -Long Beach for
July, 1987 and July, 1988. Said adjustments shall be in direct
proportion to any upward or downward movement in the aforesaid
Consumer Price Index, with the 1967 Index used as the base year.
4. Paragraph 10 of said Transit Agreement is hereby amended to
provide for thirty (30) days written notice by either party to
terminate the contract.
LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC.
WILLIAM JOHNSON, Vice President of
Operations/Western Area
CITY OF M
r
y Administrator
ATTEST: %
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 62-88
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE FOR LEASE SITES 62/62W
(HITTLE'S LANDING) FROM ROBERT E. AND MARILYN HITTLE TO
ROBERT J. OBRIEN
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the existing Tenants, Robert E. and Marilyn Hittle
are obligated by the terms of a settlement agreement with the
City of Morro Bay, approved by City Resolution No. 12-88 on
February 22, 1988, to sell and transfer said lease for Lease
Sites 62/62W and have the proposed buyer and assignment approved
by June 30, 1988; and
WHEREAS, Robert J. OBrien, the proposed buyer and assignee,
is hereby found to be an acceptable tenant; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that consent is hereby given
by the City Council of the City of Morro Bay for assignment of
that certain lease dated for Lease Sites 62/62W to Robert J.
OBrien, subject to all existing terms and conditions in said
lease and also subject to receipt and approval of all required
documents by the City Attorney, prior to September 30, 1988.
This consent to assignment is contingent upon escrow being closed
and the assignment fully consummated on or before September 30,
1988.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in the event that this
assignment of lease for Lease Sites 62/62W has not been completed
by September 30, 1988 the City may consider this assignment null,
void and of no effect and the terms of the settlement agreement
between the City and Robert E. and Marilyn Hittle shall prevail.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk are
hereby authorized to sign any and all required documents to
complete this agreement on behalf of the City of Morro Bay.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Morro
Bay at a regular meeting held thereof on the 27th day of June,
1988, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
i
DALE REDDELL, MAYOR
ATTEST:
� /
ARD H DAVIS, CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 61-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MORRO BAY, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO
THE CLASSIFICATION, COMPENSATION, AND
TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT OF MANAGEMENT
EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY
THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of the California
Government Code Sections 3500 et. sequ. and Resolution 74-69 of
the City of Morro Bay the City's representatives have met and
conferred in good faith pertaining to the subject of wages,
benefits, and conditions of employment for management employees
of the City; and
WHEREAS, the meeting between the management employees and
the City had resulted in a mutual agreement and understanding to
recommend that the management employees accept all of the terms
and conditions as set forth in a Memorandum of Understanding, an
agreement attached and made a part of this resolution herewith;
and
WHEREAS, the City now desires to provide said salary
increases and change in benefits to said management employees of
the City of Morro Bay;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Morro Bay City
Council does hereby approve and adopt in full the Memorandum of
Understanding as attached and made a part of this resolution
herewith.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of Morro Bay at a
regular meeting thereof held this 13th day of June 1988, by the
following roll call vote.
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Dale Reddell, Mayor
ATTEST:
Ardith Davis, City Clerk
)RANDUM OF UNDERSTANI
BETWEEN THE
MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES
AND THE
CITY OF MORRO BAY
1 JULY 1988 - 30 JUNE 1991
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE NO. SUBJECT PAGE
1 Term 3
2 Management 3
3 Anti -Discrimination 3
4 Work Schedule 3
5 Salaries 4
6 Retirement Benefits 5
7 Insurance 5
8 Holidays 6
9 Vacation Leave 6
10 Administrative Leave 7
11 Sick Leave 7
12 Mileage 8
13 No Strike, No Lock -Out 8
14 Full Understanding, Modification, Waiver 8
15 Separability 9
Signature Page 9
MEMORANDUM
BETWEEN TH.„O BAY
AND THE CITY
ARTICLE 1 - TERM
MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES
OF MORRO BAY
The term of this agreement commences on 1 July 1988 and expires and is
otherwise fully terminated on 30 June 1991.
ARTICLE 2 - MANAGEMENT
CITY retains all rights not specifically delegated by this agreement
including, but not limited to, the exclusive right to determine the mission
of its constituent departments; set standards of service; determine the
procedures and standards of selection for employment and promotion; direct
its employees; take disciplinary action for proper cause; relieve its
employees from duty because of lack of work or for other legitimate
reasons; maintain the efficiency of governmental operations; determine the
methods, means, and personnel by which governmental operations are to be
conducted; determine the content of job classifications, take all necessary
actions to carry out its mission in emergencies and exercise control and
discretion over its organization and the technology of performing its work.
The determination of whether or not an emergency exists is solely within
the discretion of the City and is expressly excluded from the Grievance
Procedure.
ARTICLE 3 - ANTI -DISCRIMINATION
The CITY agrees it will not discriminate against management employees for
the exercise of their rights under the State of California Government Code
Section 3502.
ARTICLE 4 - WORK SCHEDULE
4.1 This article is intended to define the normal hours of work and shall
not be construed as a guarantee of work per day or per week, or of
days of work per week.
4.2 WORKDAY: The normal workday shall be eight (8) hours of work in a
twenty-four (24) consecutive hour period, except in cases of
emergencies.
4.3 WORKSHIFT: Employees shall be scheduled to work on regular workshifts
having regular starting and quitting times. Except for emergencies,
employees' workshifts shall not be changed without prior notice to the
employee. Callout or overtime does not constitute a change in
workshifts.
4.4 WORKWEEK: The normal workweek shall be five (5) workdays and two (2)
consecutive days of rest in a seven (7) consecutive day period, except
in cases of emergencies, or at the specific request of an employee and
approval of department head. Nothing herein shall be construed to
eliminate currently established irregular work schedules.
4.5 EMERGENCIES: Nothing herein shall be construed to limit or restrict
the authority of management to make temporary assignments to different
or additional locations, shifts, or duties for the purpose of meeting
an emergency. Such emergency assignments shall not extend beyond the
period of said emergency.
ARTICLE 5 - SALARIES
5.1 The CITY agrees to continue a plan whereby the CITY will contribute
seven (7) percent of an employee's salary on behalf of the employee to
the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS). These amounts paid by
the CITY are employee contributions and are paid by the CITY to
satisfy the employee's obligation to contribute seven (7) percent of
salary to PERS. An employee has no option to receive the contributed
amounts directly instead of having them paid by the CITY to PERS on
behalf of the employee. The employees bear the risk of payment of any
increases in the employee contributions above the current seven (7)
percent made by action of PERS or the state legislature.
It is understood and agreed to by the parties that the CITY "pickup"
of the employee's PERS contribution is made in lieu of a wage
increase. Therefore, in all comparisons made with other agencies,
seven (7) percent of salaries will be added to the salaries otherwise
provided by the CITY to the employee, and then, comparisons will be
made.
Parties agree the CITY payment of the seven (7) percent PERS
contribution is made based upon tax treatment currently permitted by
the State Franchise Tax Board and the IRS. Should current tax
treatment change, the employee holds harmless the CITY, its officers
and agents from any and all claims or costs of any type including but
not limited to liability for back taxes, arising out of this agreement
to pay seven (7) percent of the employee's PERS contribution. Should
current tax treatment change, the employees shall have the opportunity
to meet and confer regarding any such changes.
5.2 The parties agree that Management employees
following percentage increases.
1 July
1988-89 5%
1989-90 5%
1990-91 5%
should receive the
Cd
5.3 The actual salary ranges shall be:
Classification
1 July 88
1 July 89
1 July 90
Police Lieutenant
$32,292-$39,251
$33,907-$41,214
$35,602-$43,274
Associate Planner
$28,377-$35,473
$29,796-$37,246
$31,286-$39,109
Chief Bldg. Insp.
$28,377-$35,473
$29,796-$37,246
$31,286-$39,109
Water Engineer
$28,377-$35,473
$29,796-$37,246
$31,286-$39,109
Accountant
$26,951-$33,551
$28,299-$35,229
$29,714-$36,990
Adm. Assistant
$26,951-$33,551
$28,299-$35,229
$29,714-$36,990
Assoc. Civil Eng.
$26,951-$33,551
$28,299-$35,229
$29,714-$36,990
Chief HPO
$26,951-$33,551
$28,299-$35,229
$29,714-$36,990
Water Qual. Cont. Supt.
$26,951-$33,551
$28,299-$35,229
$29,714-$36,990
ARTICLE 6 - RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The CITY agrees to provide employees in this unit with a retirement benefit
program through the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS), similar to
PERS benefits granted to similarly situated PERS qualified employees in
other City bargaining units. City agrees to implement these benefits on
the same time schedule as those other bargaining units.
ARTICLE 7 - INSURANCE
7.1 HEALTH INSURANCE
During the term of this Agreement the City shall offer both indemnity
and HMO medical insurance plans unless during the term of the
Agreement the Employee Relations Committee recommends alternative
plans and the recommendation is accepted by the City Council.
7.2 DENTAL INSURANCE
During the term of this Agreement, the City shall offer dental
insurance through a dental carrier unless during the term of the
Agreement the Employee Relations Committee recommends an alternative
carrier and the recommendation is accepted by the City Council.
7.3 Effective 1 July 1988 employees shall pay the following premium rates
for medical and dental insurance:
Years of Service Medical Dental
employee + 1 dep. + 2 dep.
0-2 0 $9.80 $16.24 $1.54
Start of 3rd. yr. 0 0 0 0
7.4 Any increase to the dependent portion of medical or dental premiums
that occur during the term of this Agreement shall be paid 75% by the
City, and 25% by the employee.
5
7.5 The effective date of this Memorandum of Understanding shall also be
the effective date of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation
Act (COBRA) provisions for members of this unit.
7.6 LIFE INSURANCE
It is understood that a $10,000 Life Insurance policy is provided to
Management employees, and is included in the Dental premium rate.
7.7 LTD INSURANCE
The Management employees shall participate in the City -provided Long
Term Disability Insurance Plan. The cost of this plan shall be as
follows:
1 July 88
City 1.5%
Employee 0
ARTICLE 8 - HOLIDAYS
1 July 89 1 July 90
1.5% 1.5%
0 0
8.1 For the purpose of this agreement, the following days are the holidays
for the employees in this unit:
Independence Day
Labor Day
Veteran's Day
Thanksgiving Day
Day after Thanksgiving
Christmas Day
Day after Christmas
New Year's Day
Lincoln's Birthday
Washington's Birthday
Memorial Day
Floating Holiday
July 4
1st Monday in
September
November 11
4th Thursday
in November
Friday after
Thanksgiving
December 25
December 26
January 1
February 12
3rd Monday in
February
Last Monday in
May
varies
8.2 It is agreed that when a holiday is proclaimed by the Mayor of the
CITY, then each employee shall be granted time -off in the same number
of equivalent work hours.
ARTICLE 9 - VACATION LEAVE
9.1 During the term of this agreement, paid vacation leave shall be earned
at the rate contained in the Personnel Rules and Regulations on a bi-
weekly basis.
9.2 There is no limit on the amount of unused vacation leave hours that
may be accumulated by members of this unit.
N
9.3 Upon termination of employment with the CITY, a member of this unit
shall receive pay for their current vacation leave balance up to a
maximum of the employee's annual entitlement at their current base
hourly rate.
9.4 A member of this unit may exercise an option to convert into cash a
maximum of forty (40) hours of accrued vacation leave each fiscal
year. Such conversion shall be computed at the employee's current
base hourly rate on an hour per hour basis.
ARTICLE 10 - ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE
10.1 Each member of the unit shall be eligible to earn thirty-two (32)
hours of administrative leave per fiscal year.
10.2 The time during the fiscal year at which an employee may take
administrative leave shall be determined by their department head with
regard for the wishes of the employees and particular regard for the
needs of the service.
10.3 No administrative leave may be
fiscal year, except upon prior
Unused administrative leave may
with the CITY.
accumulated for use in a following
approval of the City Administrator.
not,be cashed -out upon termination
10.4 Each member of the unit may be eligible for additional administrative
leave upon authorization from the City Administrator. Such
administrative leave may be granted when employees are required to
perform their responsibilities in times of immediate threat to public
health safety and property, beyond their regular work schedule. The
approval of such time is not guaranteed, and sole discretion without
appeal rights rests with the City Administrator, and is expressly
eliminated from the Grievance Procedure. Recognizing the impact of
the Fair Labor Standards Act, employees in this unit will be sensitive
to the operational needs and financial limitations of the City, and
will therefore attempt to limit the use of overtime by employees in
their respective areas of responsibility.
ARTICLE 11 - SICK LEAVE
11.1 During the term of this agreement, sick leave shall be earned at the
rate of eight (8) hours for each calendar month of service. Unused
sick leave shall be accumulated to a total of not more than nine
hundred and sixty (960) hours.
11.2 Upon the service retirement of an employee who has more than ten (10)
years of service with the CITY, said employee shall be entitled to
receive payment for up to the first seven hundred twenty (720) hours
of his/her accrued sick leave at thirty-five percent (35%) of the
employee's rate of pay as of the date of service retirement.
11.3 Service retirement is defined as service retirement from both the CITY
and the respective retirement system thereof.
7
ARTICLE 12 - MILEAGE
CITY will pay $.20 per mile as reimbursement to members of the unit for all
mileage they incur when on official business, provided there is no CITY car
or other pool car available for CITY business. Said reimbursement shall be
subject to availability of funds in the CITY budget and approval by the
Department Head.
ARTICLE 13 - NO STRIKE, NO LOCK -OUT
13.1 During the term of this agreement, the CITY will not lock -out any
employees nor will the employees cause, authorize, advise or encourage
any interruption of work or any other concerted action. The term
"interruption of work" shall mean any work stoppage or strike
(including economic and unfair labor practice strikes) or any
intentional slowdown of work. The term "other concerted action"
includes picketing or boycott activities by the employees.
13.2 There shall be no refusal to work on, handle or produce any materials
or equipment because of a labor dispute.
13.3 Any employee engaging in any action prohibited by this Article shall
be subject to immediate discharge or such other discipline as the CITY
may assess. Such discharge or discipline shall not be reviewable
through the Grievance Procedure.
ARTICLE 14 - FULL UNDERSTANDING, MODIFICATION WAIVER
14.1 This Agreement sets forth the full and entire understanding of the
parties regarding the matters set forth herein, and any other prior or
existing understanding or agreements by the parties, whether formal or
informal, regarding any such matters are hereby superseded or
terminated in their entirety.
14.2 It is agreed and understood that each party hereto voluntarily and
unqualifiedly waives its right to negotiate, and agrees that the other
party shall not be required to negotiate, with respect to any matter
covered herein.
14.3 No agreement, alteration, understanding, variation, waiver, or
modification of any of the terms or provisions contained herein shall
in any manner be binding upon the parties hereto unless made and
executed in writing by all parties hereto, and if required, approved
by the CITY and ratified by the members of this unit.
14.4 The waiver of any breach of any term, or condition of this Agreement
by either party shall not constitute a precedent in the future
enforcement of all its terms and provisions.
F,
ARTICLE 15 - SEPARABILITY
If any provision(s) are held to be contrary to law by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such provision(s) will not be deemed valid and subsisting
except to the extent permitted by law, but all other provisions will
continue in full force and effect.
Signature
Forrest W. Henderson
(b. it
Date
Representative, Management
Bill Boucher
&Z9/68
Date
RESOLUTION NO, 60-60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY,
ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING AN INTERIM USE PERMIT AND
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR MINOR PARK FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
TO LILA KAISER PARK
T H E C I T Y C 0 U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Morro Bay,
California, on the 16th day of June, 1988 held a duly noticed
PUBLIC HEARING to consider a City initiated request for an
Interim Use Permit and Coastal Development Permit to allow
construction of a scorebooth for the westerly sportsfield at Lila
Keiser Park located at the southerly terminius of J Street and
adjacent to Morro Creek; and
WHEREAS, after said PUBLIC HEARINGS the Planning Commission
did approve the request by adoption of Planning Commission
Resolution No. 25-88; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Coordinator determined that the
project will not result in a significant adverse impact on the
environment, and therefore, qualifies for the filing of a
Negative Declaration for purposes of the California Environmental
Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, on June 13th, 1988, the City Council of the City
of Morro Bay, California, held a duly noticed PUBLIC HEARING to
consider the request and recommendations made by the Planning
Commission; and
WHEREAS, at said PUBLIC HEARING, after considering the staff
report, Planning Commission recommendation and the arguments of
all persons, wishing to testify, the City Council found the
following facts and reasons to justify approval of the Interim
Use Permit and Coastal Development Permit:
1. The construction of a scorebooth at Lila Keiser Park is
consistent with both the LUP and zoning designations because the
Interim designation allows for recreational uses. Previous City
approvals have established the consistency of the park at this
location.
2. The requested uses meet the intent of section 17.60.050 B.
of the zoning ordinance as follows: the scorebooth, while
constructed as a permanent structure is inexpensive and can be
easily demolished and removed if necessary; the scorebooth is a
minor improvement in the context of the existing public park
facilities and is subordinate to the existing visual setting; the
property owner, leases the site to the City under terms and
agreements acceptable to both, and the lessor has provided a
letter authorizing the City to consturct a scorebooth.
City Council Resolution No. 60-88
Page Two
3. The conditions of approval can set the term for the interim
use permit as an indefinite period to coincide with the li'�e of
other park facilities at the site.
4. No landscaping or screening plan is necessary as the area is
now fully landscaped and screened as a result of previous park
development.
5. The requested approval is consistent with the terms of the
interim urgency ordinance No. 318 because the construction
proposed is a minor addition to the park facilities that in no
way prejudice the City's planning activities for the areas that
are now in progress. The planning studies resulting from interim
ordinances 301, 304, and 318 are nearing conclusion and no
proposals have been received or contemplated that would result in
making the existing park facilities inconsistent. Even is this
were not the case, the limited scale and cost of the improvements
contemplated would not alter the City's ability to plan and
implement some other land use arrangement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and
constitute the findings of the Council in this matter; and,
2. That the Council does hereby approve of Case No. IUP 20-
88/CDP 64-88R, subject to the conditions attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay, on the 27th day of June, 1988, by the
following vote to wit:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
TRUITH DAVIS, City e-rR
0
CUNDITIUSS OF APPROVAL
Case No. IUP 20-88/CDP 64-88R
STANDARD CONDITIONS
1. This Special Use Permit/Coastal Permit, are granted for the
land described in the application and any attachments
thereto, and as shown on Exhibit A, and on file with the
Community Development Department. The locations of all
buildings and other features shall be located and designed
substantially as shown on the aforementioned exhibit, unless
otherwise specified herein.
2. Unless the construction or operation of the structure or
facility is commenced not later than one (1) year after the
effective date of this approval and is diligently pursued
thereafter, this approval will automatically become null and
void; provided, however, that upon the written request of
the applicant, prior. to the expiration of this approval, an
extension for not more than one (1) additional year may be
granted by the Community Development Director, upon finding
that the project complies with all applicable provisions of
the Morro Bay Municipal Code in effect at the time of the
extension request.
3. Any minor change may be approved by the Community
Development Director. Any substantial change will require
the filing of an application for an amendment to be
considered by the Planning Commission.
4. All requirements of any law, ordinance or regulation of the
State of California, City of Morro Bay, and any other
governmental entity shall be complied with in the exercise
of this approval.
5. Prior to obtaining a building permit and within thirty (30)
days hereof, the applicant shall file with'the Director of
Planning and Community Development written acceptance of the
conditions stated herein.
6. Compliance with and execution of all conditions listed
hereon shall be necessary, unless otherwise specified, prior
to obtaining final building inspection clearance. Deviation
from this requirement shall be permitted only by written
consent of the Community Development Director and/or as
authorized by the Planning Commission. Failure to comply
with these conditions shall render this entitlement null and
void. Continuation of the use without a valid entitlement
will constitute a violation of the Morro Bay Municipal Code
and is a misdemeanor.
Conditions of Approval IUP 20-88/CDP 64-88R
Page Two
SPECIAL CONDITION'S
7. The Planning Commission can set the term for the interim use
permit as an indefinite period to coincide with the life of
other park facilities at the site.
iC n Y
O
T
4
s1 p
�m< n l�
T N
W
�H
f^
v �
L � O
i D
l<
"J
I
Cb
Y O
yj
� O
O
�
rn
m
It
lid �oysesj
2 0,
.t,
•'j5', �IJD'�UM1Ob.�'�
J
E:
af-
STREET
RESOLUTION NO. 59-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY,
ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING AN INTERIM USE PERMIT AND
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR MINOR IMPROVEMENTS TO AN EXISTING
RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK AND CAMPGROUND
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Morro Bay,
California, on the 16th day of June, 1988 held a duly noticed
PUBLIC HEARING to consider the request of Morro Dunes RV for an
Interim Use Permit and Coastal Development Permit to modify an
existing driveway location, enlarge an existing office and inpark
store, and install electricity and cable television services to
an existing dry camp facility for property located at 1700
Embarcadero; and,
WHEREAS, after said PUBLIC HEARINGS the Planning Commission
did approve the request by adoption of Planning Commission
Resolution No. 23-88; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Coordinator determined that the
will not result in a significant adverse impact on the
environment, and therefore, qualifies for the filing of a
Negative Declaration for purposes of the California Environmental
Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, on June 13th, 1988, the City Council of the City
of Morro Bay, California, held a duly noticed PUBLIC HEARING to
consider the request and recommendations made by the Planning
Commission; and
WHEREAS, at said PUBLIC HEARING, after considering the staff
report, Planning Commission recommendation and the arguments of
all persons, wishing to testify, the City Council found the
following facts and reasons to justify approval of the Interim
Use Permit and Coastal Development Permit:
1. The requested improvements
zoning designations on the
allows for recreational
approvals have established
this location.
are consistent with the LUP and
site as the Interim designation
facilities and previous City
the consistency of the use at
2. The requested uses meet the intent of section 17.60.050 B.
of the zoning ordinance in that the uses are inexpensive,
minor improvements that can be removed easily and without
hardship to the applicant if necessary; all improvements are
subordinate tot he visual setting.
3. The conditions of approval establish a limited term for the
life of this approval to expire in 1997.
0
City Council Resolution No. 59-88
Page Two
4. The conditions of approval establish necessary controls on
signing, landscaping, fencing, and safety of ingress and
egress from the facility for motor vehicles and pedestrians.
5. The requested approval is consistent with the terms of the
interim urgency ordinance No. 318 because the construction
proposed is a minor addition to the existing recreational
facility that in no way prejudice the City's planning
activities for the areas that are now in progress.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and
constitute the findings of the Council in this matter; and,
2. That the Council does hereby approve of Case Nos. IUP 12-88/
CDP 63-88R, subject to the conditions attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay, on the 13th day of June, 1988, by the
following vote to wit:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
CUgDITIUSS OF APPROVAL
Case No. IUP.12-BB/CDP 63-BBR
STANDARD CONDITION'S
1. This Special Use Permit/Coastal Permit, are granted for the
land described in the application and any attachments
thereto, and as shown on Exhibit A, and on file with the
Community Development Department. The locations of all
buildings and other features shall be located and designed
substantially as shown on the aforementioned exhibit, unless
otherwise specified herein.
2. Unless the construction or operation of the structure or
facility is commenced not later than one (1) year after the
effective date of this approval and is diligently pursued
thereafter, this approval will automatically become null and
void; provided, however, that upon the written request of
the applicant, prior, to the expiration of this approval, an
extension for not more than one (1) additional year may be
granted by the Community Development Director, upon finding
that the project complies with all applicable provisions of
the Morro Bay Municipal Code in effect at the time of the
extension request.
3. Any minor change may be approved by the Community.
Development Director. Any substantial change will require
the filing of an application for an amendment to be
considered by the Planning Commission.
4. All requirements of any law, ordinance or regulation of the
State of California, City of Morro Bay, and any other
governmental entity shall be complied with in the exercise
of this approval.
5. Prior to obtaining a building permit and within thirty (30)
days hereof, the applicant shall file with'the Director of
Planning and Community Development written acceptance of the
conditions stated 'herein.
6. Compliance with and execution of all conditions listed
hereon shall be necessary, unless otherwise specified, prior
to obtaining final building inspection clearance. Deviation
from this requirement shall be permitted only by written
consent of the Community Development 'Director and/or as
authorized by the Planning Commission. Failure to comply
with these conditions shall render this entitlement null and
void. Continuation of the use without a valid entitlement
will constitute a violation of the Morro Bay Municipal Code
and is a misdemeanor.
Conditions of Approval IUP 12-88/CDP 63-88R
Page Two
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
7. Prior to obtaining a building permit the applicant
shall obtain any water equivelencies or water approvals
that may be determined to be required by the Director.
B. Prior to obtaining a building permit any modifications
to the existing sign program shall be approved by the
Director.
9. Prior to obtaining a building permit a detailed
landscaping plan shall be submitted to and approved by
the Director.
10. Engineering details of all improvements in the public
right of way shall be prepared to conform to City
standard specifications and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Director of Public Works. Encroachment
permits shall be required prior to beginning work in
the public right of way.
11. Installation of electrical service and cable television
service to the dry camp area shall be performed
according to the requirements of the service
providers.
12. The portion of the existing fence at the northwest
corner of the project site which extends onto the
parcel occupied by the City's wastewater treatment
plant shall be removed in order to provide for
reasonable sight distances for traffic entering and
leaving the project site and the treatment plant
driveway.
13. The term of this interim use permit shall coincide with
previous use permit approvals for the site (CUP 07-83
amended) which provides a term expiring in 1997.
0 RESOLUTION NO. 58-88 It
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MORRO BAY, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND
DIRECTING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TO GRANT ADMINISTRATIVE
EXCEPTIONS TO THE PARKING STANDARDS OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE FOR TWO
YEARS IN DOWNTOWN MORRO BAY
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, unlike other commercial areas of Morro Bay, many small
businesses in the downtown area of Morro Bay are currently
experiencing a period of economic difficulty and decline that is
reflected by numerous turnovers in business operations; and
WHEREAS, the current economic environment in downtown Morro Bay
has resulted in particular hardship for small retail and food service
business owners and the community in general through loss of earnings
and loss of revenue; and
WHEREAS, many such business owners desire to reverse this trend
by investing in and expanding an existing business or through
development of new facilities, but are hampered in making such
improvements by the costs or difficulty in meeting the parking
requirements of the city's current parking ordinance; and
WHEREAS, a draft circulation plan recently prepared and approved
in concept by the City Council included a study of the parking
situation in the downtown area defined on the attached exhibit A, and
concluded that there is no immediate parking shortage; and
WHEREAS, a 5-week City pilot program in the summer of 1987
enforcing the two-hour parking limits posted in the downtown area
produced only 16 warnings and 6 parking citations, causing the
conclusion that availability of downtown parking is not a problem; and
WHEREAS, removing the burden of the parking requirements from
such businesses is envisioned by the Council as a means of encouraging
improvements and investments in the individual businesses with related
community wide benefits, so long as there remains an adequate parking
supply; and
WHEREAS, the City is committed to the implementation of an
overall parking management plan for the downtown area designed to
provide long-term resolutions to parking requirements, and this plan
is currently under preparation by the City, and
WHEREAS, the parking exceptions will not constitute a grant of a
special privilege inconsistent with the parking limitations upon other
properties in the vicinity because the parking exception will be
equally available to all retail and food service businesses in the
area and any beneficiaries of the exception shall be required to
participate in any future parking assessment district that may be
formed; and
WHEREAS, the exceptions will not adversely affect the health,
safety or general welfare of persons working or residing in the
vicinity because there is not a current parking shortage in the area;
and
City
Council
Resolut * No. 58-88
Page
Two
WHEREAS, the exception is reasonably necessary for the full
enjoyment of uses permitted upon the above classes of commercially
zoned properties because many business persons are unable to meet the
normal parking standard; and
WHEREAS, exceptions to the parking ordinance in the downtown area
will not adversely affect public access to the shoreline.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Morro Bay, that,
for a period not to exceed two years from the date of this resolution,
the Community Development Director shall grant exceptions to the
requirements of the parking ordinance pursuant to the provisions of
section 17.44.050 of the Municipal Code; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the exceptions will apply to new or
expanded commercial retail or food service businesses, but not to any
other kinds of businesses; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the area within which exceptions may
be granted is the downtown commercial area shown on the attached
exhibit which is made a part of this resolution; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, approval of the parking exception
will be subject to contribution to the improvement of the building
facade or street amenities equal to 10% of the value of the building
improvements proposed.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, any applicant receiving the parking
exception shall enter binding agreements with the City to not protest
their inclusion in any future parking assessment district that may be
formed by the City in the downtown area.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City
of Morro Bay, on the 13th day of June, 1988, by the following vote to
wit:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
I
F.10 D)NY0 IYAPAf:41�*iN�79
,����
:• �i_ELL, Mayor
U
"/I
P-1
HET El EN❑
t
r
Downtown .Parking
C Incentive District
RESOLUTION NO. 57-88
A RESOLUTION REJECTING ALL BIDS ON WATERLINE
REPLACEMENT PROJECT NO. 87-10
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to Public Contract
Code §20166 and the Morro Bay Municipal Code §3.08.1001, has
the discretion to reject all bids presented and readvertise;
WHEREFORE, after conducting public hearings on May 9,
May 23, and May 25, 1988, reviewing the staff reports and
other information presented by City Staff and hearing all
comments by interested parties, the City Council hereby
makes the following finding of fact: The interest of the
City and the citizens of Morro Bay will best be served by
rejecting all bids and readvertising the project;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, based on said finding and the
evidence presented to Council and in accordance with Section
20166 of the Public Contract Code and Section 3.08.1001 of
the Morro Bay Municipal Code, the City Council hereby
rejects all bids on Project No. P.W. 87-10.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Morro Bay at a regular meeting held thereof on the 13th day
of June, 1988 by the following roll call:
AYES: Lemons, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: Donnelly, Odell
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
J".• • 0
RESOLUTION NO. 56-88
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING STATE LEGISLATIVE
REFORM OF THE CALIFORNIA WORKERS
COMPENSATION SYSTEM (SB 323)
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, job stress claims have become the fastest
growing type of workers' compensation claim; and
WHEREAS, the California Workers' Compensation System
was never designed to deal with claims in which employees
said they were suffering from routine and cumulative emo-
tional job stress; and
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay has also in recent years
experienced a proliferation of stress and psyche trauma
claims and awards; and
WHEREAS, a special California legislative committee,
the Conference Committee on SB 323 (Lockyer), is working
diligently for workers' compensation reform; and
WHEREAS, the Governor has developed a proposal for
workers' compensation reform, including a provision to limit
questionable job stress claims; and
WHEREAS, the likelihood of major reform to the Califor-
nia Workers' Compensation System is the best in many years.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Morro Bay City
Council urges the Governor and the Legislature to limit job
stress claims in their legislative provisions including:
1. The elimination of job stress claims which result
from pressures and tensions ordinarily encountered
by employees performing the same or similar kind
of work; and
2. The elimination of job stress claims filed by
workers caused by personnel actions such as demo-
tions, job transfers, reclassifications and
terminations.
Resolution No. 56-88
Page 2
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Morro Bay City Council at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of June, 1988
on the following vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
DALE REDDELL, Mayor
ATTEST:
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 55-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY
ESTABLISHING USER RATES AND RELATED FEES AND DEPOSITS FOR
WATER SERVICES
THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City wishes to continue to provide an adequate
and reliable water supply; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that adjustments in rates
charged for this service is necessary to provide additional
funds for system maintenance, operation and improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that adjustments in rates
are necessary to fund EIR and Feasibility studies of the San
Bernardo Creek Project; and
WHEREAS, the City has successfully completed a six month
trial period of monthly billing and wishes to formalize this
procedure;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay that the following schedule of water user
rates, fees and deposits for services is adopted, effective for
the 1988-89 fiscal year and thereafter.
MONTHLY WATER RATES
Minimum charge/monthly . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.94
(includes up to 200 ccf of water use)
Use Charge/100 cubic feet:
0- 2 . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . $
.97
3- 10 . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . $
1.22
11- 25 . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . $
1.53
26- 50 . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . $
1.78
51- 75 . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . $
2.08
76-100 . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . $
2.34
101-greater . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . $
2.64
OTHER WATER RATES
Reconnect charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 31.00
Delinquent charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10%
Construction meter:
Setting charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 31.00
Use charge/day. . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3.00
Use rate/100 cubic feet . . . . . $ same as
residential use charge
0
RESOLUTION NO. 55-88
PAGE TWO
Deposit:
Residential renter.
Construction renter
$ 50.00
$ 65.00
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Morro
Bay at a regular meeting held thereof this 13th day of June,
1988 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Lemons, Odell, Sheetz
None
None
Donnelly, Reddell
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
RESOLUTION 54-88
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MORRO BAY ESTABLISHING USER RATES AND RELATED
FEES AND DEPOSITS FOR SEWER SERVICES
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City seeks to continue to provide for a
properly functioning wastewater collector and treatment system,
complying with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and
State Water Quality Control Board requirements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that adjustments in rates
charged for these services are necessary to provide additional
funds for system maintenance, operation and improvements;
WHEREAS, the City has successfully completed a six month
trial period of monthly billing, and wishes to formalize this
procedure;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay that the following schedule of user rates,
fees, and deposits for services is adopted, effective for the
1988-89 fiscal year and thereafter.
MONTHLY - SEWER RATES
Residential/unit . . . . . . .
. . .$
6.75 flat
(surcharge - 10 ccf). . . . . .
. . .$
.95/ccf
Mobile Home Park . . . . . . . . . .
. . .$
1.20/ccf
Commercial (domestic strength) . . .
. . .$
1.20/ccf
Restaurants and Bakeries . . . . . .
. . .$
2.75/ccf
Retirement Home/Convalescent Hosp. .
. . .$
2.15/ccf
Motel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . $
1.50/ccf
Mortuary . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . $
1.80/ccf
Schools and Public Buildings . . . .
. . .$
.95/ccf
Seafood Processors . . . . . . . . .
. . .$
2.75/ccf
Water Softening . . . . . . . . . . .
. . .$
.95/ccf
Fixed Fee (all users per meter). . .
. . .$
1.10 flat
Minimum (all users per meter). . . .
. . .$
6.75 flat
Delinquent Charge . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
10%
RESOLUTION NO. 54-88
PAGE TWO
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council
Bay at a regular meeting held thereof on the
1988, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Lemons, Odell, Sheetz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Donnelly, Reddell
ATTEST:
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
of the City of Morro
13th day of June,
0
RESOLUTION NO. 53-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY
ESTABLISHING NEW WATER AND SEWER AVAILABILITY CHARGES
FOR THE VARIOUS CITY WATER ALLOCATION PROGRAMS
WHEREAS, the City has established a water equivalency
program for the allocation of water to new users in a reasonable
and orderly fashion; and
WHEREAS, the City has established an availability charge for
recovery of a proportionate share of the cost of infrastructure
in the water and sewer systems from the new user; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that adjustments in
availability charges is necessary to fund EIR and feasibility
studies of the San Bernardo Creek Project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds these fees are necessary for
the usual and current expenses of the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay that the following schedule of fees is adopted
effective June 14, 1988 and thereafter.
FEES PER WATER EQUIVALENCY PROGRAM
Pipeline Replacement Equivalency:
Water Availability Charge $3,575.00
Sewer Availability Charge 2,750.00
Total $6,325.00
Retrofit Equivalency:
Water Availability Charge $1,525.00
Sewer Availability Charge 687.50
Total $2,212.50
Blended Equivalency:
Water Availability Charge $2,550.00
Sewer Availability Charge 1,718.75
Total $4,268.75
0
RESOLUTION NO. 53-88
PAGE TWO
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council
Bay at a regular meeting thereof held on the
1988, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Lemons, Odell, Sheetz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN:Donnelly, Reddell
ATTEST:
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
of the City of Morro
13th day of June,
• RESOLUTION NO. 52-88 46
RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSENT TO SUBLEASE AGREEMENT
ON A PORTION OF LEASE SITE 71, AND ADDING AND
DELETING PERMITTED USES ON LEASE SITE 71-72W
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay is the lessor of certain property
on the Morro Bay waterfront described as Lease Site 71; and
WHEREAS, Morro Bay Marina is the lessee of said property; and
WHEREAS, said lease provides that the consent of City shall be
obtained to any sublease of said property or portion of said property;
and
WHEREAS, said lessee has entered into a sublease agreement with
Bruce and Kathy Lewis, doing business as Kathy's Place II, a copy of
which sublease agreement has been presented to the City of Morro Bay.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Morro Bay does hereby consent to:
1. The sublease of a portion of Lease Site 71 to Bruce and
Kathy Lewis, doing business as Kathy's Place II; and
2. Addition of Retail Clothing Store as a permitted use on
Lease Site 71-72W; and
3. Living quarters for lessee is deleted as a permitted use on
Lease Site 71-72W.
Said consent is hereby given subject to receipt and approval
of all required documents by the City Attorney;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby
directed to sign any and all required documents to complete this
agreement on behalf of the City of Morro Bay.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Morro Bay City Council at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of May, 1988 on the following
vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None )LD, I
DALE REDDEL , Mayor
ATTEST:
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
RESOLUTION NO. 51-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MORRO BAY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 95-87 IN ITS
ENTIRETY AND ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDING A GENERAL PLAN
AND COASTAL LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT AND CORRESPONDING CHANGE OF
ZONE FOR CERTAIN DESCRIBED PROPERTIES
CASE NOS. CUP GPA/LCP/ZOA 01-87
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Morro Bay,
California, did on the loth day of August, 1987, and the 23rd day
of May, 1988, hold a duly noticed PUBLIC HEARING to consider the
request of James Merzon for an amendment to the General Plan Land
Use Element and Certified Local Coastal Program changing the
designation from low -density residential to low -medium density
residential; and, consideration of a change of zone from R-A to
R-1, for a d10,800 square foot site generally located at the
southeast corner of Ironwood Avenue and Sequoia Court; more
specifically described as:
Portion of APN: 65-150-10
Portion of Lot 2, Parcel Map No. 79-278
WHEREAS, the Environmental Coordinator has determined that
the subject project amendments and change of zone will not result
in a significant adverse impact on the environment, and
therefore, qualifies for the filing of a Negative Declaration for
purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, the City has complied with all public review
requirements pursuant to Section 13515 (a)(2) through (6) and
13515 (c) of the Coastal Act Regulations, and all other statutory
requirements for public noticing, and review of applicable state
and local regulations, and
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, after considering the staff
reports, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and the
arguments of all persons wishing to testify at the hearing, the
City Council did find the following facts and reasons to justify
its action in this matter:
General Plan and Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment
The orderly growth and physical development of the community
would better be served by the contemplated land use
designation;
City Council Resolution No.
Page Two
2. The contemplated land use is consistent with other
applicable policies of the City General Plan;
3. The contemplated amendment is in conformance with and helps
to implement the California Coastal Act.
Change of Zone
1. The proposed zone district is consistent with, and
implements the contemplated land use designation;
2. The proposed zone district is compatible with the use and
enjoyment of adjacent properties.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and
constitute the findings of the Council on this matter; and
2. That the Council does hereby approve of a General Plan Land
Use Element and Certified Local Coastal Program amendments
and corresponding zone change for property described hereon
and illustrated in the attached exhibit, labeled Exhibit
"All.
3. That the City Council hereby certifies that the amendments
are intended to be carried out in a manner fully in
conformity with the California Coastal Act and the certified
Local Coastal Program of the City of Morro Bay; and
4. That the amendments will take effect automatically upon
Coastal Commission approval.
5. That this resolution amends in its entirety previous Council
Resolution No. 95-87.
PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Morro
Bay at a regular meeting held thereof on the 23th day of May,
1988, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz
NOES: None,/
ABSTAIN: REDDELL
ATTEST: '
Y
PAUL• DONNELI.Y , Mayor Pro Tem
%/ -e
AAII7T y Clerk
a f
D �
X
� N•
N
�
m
.,.,
cn
�
Z
�
c
_
-•1
ti
ID
a
j
3
O
•`
?
ul�
M
.'o
O
m
0
(1]
m
v _
v
m �-
En
9
.. i--1 • •
RESOLUTION NO. 50-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MORRO BAY, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING AN APPEAL AND MODIFYING
THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A VARIANCE
TO ALLOW TANDEM PARKING
T H E C I T Y C 0 U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Morro Bay,
California, after a duly noticed public hearing on March 7, 1988,
did approve a request by James Skaff for a variance from parking
standards to allow a tandem garage located at 458 Fresno Avenue
in the R-1 zone; more particularly described as:
APN 66-191-16
Block 21, Lot 13
City of Morro Bay
County of San Luis Obispo
State of California
WHEREAS, on March 21, 1988, the original applicant did
appeal the Planning Commission's conditions of approval to the
City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Morro Bay did on
May 9, 1988, hold a duly noticed public hearing on said appeal;
and
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, after considering the staff
reports, the Planning Commission's report on this matter, and the
testimony, both oral and written, of all persons wishing to
testify at the hearing, the City Council did find the following
facts and reasons to justify granting the appeal:
1. That the City of Morro Bay did issue a building permit to
allow an addition as proposed by the applicant. The
applicant in good faith initiated construction and almost
completed the addition when it was found that it did not
comply with parking requirements. For the applicant to
provide the required parking, substantial modifications at
this late date represent a hardship and a special
circumstance; and
2. That the subject property has a substandard width and if the
applicant were to provide parking in accordance with City
standards, turning movements for vehicles on the property
would be constrained given the limited physical size of the
property;
City Council Resolution No. 50-88
Page Two
3. That if two full sized parking spaces were provided in
accordance with the applicant's request, there would be a
significant loss of open space, an increase in the amount of
imperious surfaces, and building mass. These factors would
decrease overall livability for surrounding properties and
is representative of a special privilege. Therefore, the
Commission hereby modifies the applicant's proposal in
accordance with the conditions attached hereto.
4. That the City of Morro Bay has approved other variances in
the surrounding area to reduce parking requirements; thus,
approval of this request is not a special privilege.
Furthermore, there are other residences within the general
area of similar or greater size which do not meet parking
requirements;
5. That the City of Morro Bay has found that the request is
consistent with the low -medium density residential
designation as provided in Morro Bay's Coastal Land Use
Plan. The proposal does not impact public views, inhibit
public access to the coast or place an excessive demand on
coastal resources;
6. That because of special circumstances applicable to the
subject property, the strict application of the Zoning
Ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of
privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity under
identical R-1 classification;
7. That the Variance requested will not constitute a grant of a
special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon
other properties in the vicinity and in the R-1 zone in
which the subject property is situated.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and
constitute the findings of the Council on this matter; and
2. That the Council does hereby grant said appeal and does
thereby approve Variance 02-88, to allow the construction of
a tandem garage on the rear of the property, with conditions
attached hereto.
J
City Council Resolution No. 50-88
Page Three
PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Morro Bay
at a regular meeting held thereof on the 23rd day of May, 1988,
by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Rbddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Sheetz
ATTEST:
T�VT3 71 y�Tcr
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Case No VAR 02-88
STANDARD CONDITIONS
1. This Variance is granted for the land described in the
dppli0dtion and any attachments thereto and as shown on
Exhibit A and on file with the Community Development
Department. The locations of all buildings and other
features shall be located and designed substantially as
shown on the aforementioned exhibits, unless otherwise
specified herein.
2. Unless the construction or operation of the structure or
facility is commenced not later than one (1) year after the
effective date of this approval and is diligently pursued
thereafter, this approval will automatically become null and
void; provided, however, that upon the written request of
the applicant, prior to the expiration of this approval, an
extension for not more than one (1) additional year may be
granted by the Community Development Director, upon finding
that the project complies with all applicable provisions of
the Morro Bay Municipal Code in effect at the time of the
extension request.
3. Any minor change may be approved by he Planning and
Community Development Director. Any substantial change will
require the filing of an application for an amendment to be
considered by the Planning Commission.
4. All requirements of any law, ordinance or regulation of the
State of California, City of Morro Bay, and any other
governmental entity shall be complied with in the exercise
of this approval.
5. Prior to obtaining a building permit and within thirty (30)
days hereof, the applicant shall file with the Director of
Planning and Community Development written acceptance of the
conditions stated herein.
6. Compliance with and execution of all conditions listed
hereon shall be necessary, unless otherwise specified, prior
to obtaining final building inspection clearance. Deviation
from this requirement shall be permitted only by written
consent of the Planning Community Development Director
and/or as authorized by the Planning Commission. Failure to
comply with these conditions shall render this entitlement
null and void. Continuation of the use without a valid
entitlement will constitute a violation of the Morro Bay
Municipal Code and is a misdemeanor.
v
XTElyr
-0
00 q
-77
-=W 4-
j I M,5kAFi=
I/ 5--S? /=p ;gAl 0
0
•
RESOLUTION NO. 49-88
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MORRO BAY
APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR
LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUNDS
TIDELANDS PARR RECREATIONAL PHASE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Congress under Public Law 88-578 has authorized
the establishment of a Federal Land and Water Conservation Grant -
In -Aid Program, providing matching funds to the State of
California and its political subdivisions for acquiring lands and
developing facilities for public outdoor recreation purposes; and
WHEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation is
responsible for the administration of the program within the
State, setting up necessary rules and procedures governing appli-
cation by local agencies under the program; and
WHEREAS, said adopted procedures established by the State
Department of Parks and Recreation require the applicant to cer-
tify by resolution the approval of applications and the avail-
ability of local matching funds prior to submission of said
applications to the State; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Tidelands Park Recreational Phase
project is consistent with the Statewide Comprehensive Recreation
Resources Plan: California Outdoor Recreation Plan - 1988; and
WHEREAS, the project must be compatible with the land use
plans of those jurisdictions immediately surrounding the project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council
hereby:
1. Approves the filing of an application for Land and
Water Conservation Fund assistance; and
2. Certifies that said agency has matching funds from the
general fund, park fee fund, and harbor fund and can
finance 100 percent of the project, half of which will
be reimbursed, and
Certifies that the project is compatible with the land
use plans of those jurisdictions immediately surround-
ing the project; and
i
PAGE 2
RESOLUTION 49-88
4. Appoints the City Administrator as agent of the City to
conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all docu-
ments including but not limited to applications, agree-
ments, amendments, billing statements, and so on which
may be necessary for the completion of the aforemen-
tioned project.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Morro
Bay at a regular meeting held on this 23rd day of May, 1988, by
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
ARDITA DAMS
CITY CLERK
D E REDDELL
MAYOR
0
m
i
RESOLUTION NO. 48-88
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 88/89 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
THE CITY OF MORRO BAY
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that fees and charges for
City services are in need of updating to reflect changes in the
cost of living; and
WHEREAS, Article XIII B, Section 8(c) of the California
Constitution provides that proceeds from regulatory licenses,
user charges, and user fees which do not exceed the costs of
providing the regulation product or service do not constitute
"Proceeds of taxes"; and
WHEREAS, the City has reviewed its fees, taking into
account the annual changes in personnel costs, supply costs,
and other costs and finds that the proposed revised fees are in
all cases no more than the actual cost of providing the related
service; and
WHEREAS, Morro Bay Municipal Code Section 3.34.020
provides for annual adoption of the Master Fee Schedule by
Council Resolution;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay that the attached Master Fee Schedule is
adopted and will be effective July 1, 1988, and thereafter
unless changed.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Morro Bay at a regular meeting held thereof this 23rd day of
May, 1988, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
DALE 'E��DMayor-
ATTEST:
ARDIIn DAVIS, City Clerk
CITY OF MORRO BAY
MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
for fiscal year
m
CITY OF MORRO BAY
MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
Table of Contents
Administration.........................................
1
Finance Department .....................................
2
Community Development .................... I.............
3
Police.................................................10
Fire.................................................11
Public Works...........................................12
Harbor.................................................14
County Pound Master....................................16
Health Officer.........................................17
Recreation.............................................18
0
City of Morro Bay
Master Fee Schedule
July 1, 1988
Administration
Type
Section
Vehicle Registration
Operation on certain Public
property - permit
10.28.190
Use Permit for residents on
restricted streets
10.44.020
Filing Fee
Notice of intention to
circulate petition E.C.
4002 (B)
(Refundable with conditions)
Copies
Copies mailed
Base Present Revised
Fees
$26
$27
$26
$27
$0
$200
$0.10 $0.15
$2
+ page fee
+ postage
11
•
City of Morro Bay
Master Fee Schedule
July 1, 1988
Finance Department
Type
Business License Listing
Budget & Financial Statements
Bounced Check Charge
Section
Base
per list
per copy
per check
Present
Fees
$10
Revised
$10
$18
$18
City of Morro Bay
Master Fee Schedule
July 1, 1988
Community Development
Type
Section Base
Present
Revised
Fees
Building & Construction
Permit Fees
14.12.080
UBC
UBC
Civil Defense Shelters
Permit Fees
14.36.200
UBC
UBC
Unsafe Buildings Repair
or Demolition
14.40.250
Expenses
Expenses
Marine Docks Permit
14.52.030
UBC
UBC
Moving of Demolition Bldgs
Permit & Inspection
Within or to City
14.56.270
UBC
UBC
Signs - Permits
Valuation of signs
14.64.120
UBC
UBC
Sign - Exception Permits
14.64.130
$105
$109
Harbor Structure Permit
15.20.020C
UBC
UBC
Zoning
Use Permit New Construction
$734
$763
Minor Additions of 50% or
Less and Charges to
Non -Conforming Uses
$315
$328
Occupancy Charge Only
$105
$109
Variance
Minor (Administrative, and
single family, setbacks, and
Parking standards)
$105
$109
Use Permit
Arcades
$315
$328
TV Satelite dish antenna
$105
$109
Zone change, Coastal Plan or
General Ammendment (If
application is for any
combination of these the
single base fee will be
charged plus 10% for a related
change or ammendment
$997
$1037
Code Compliance, Building
Inspection
$42
$44
Land Use Confirmation Letter
1
$31
$32
3
City of Morro Bay
Master Fee Schedule
July 1, 1988
Community Development
Type
Tentative Parcel Map Review
Tentative Tract Map Review
Certificate of Compliance
Environmental Asses Report
Initial Non -Exempt
Environmental Impact Study
Time Extensions for use permits
and Tract Maps
Time Extensions for Varinaces
and Parcel Maps
Amendments to Use Permits
Subdivision Maps & Variances
Coastal Permits
When a Coastal Permit and
other Permit (except a
variance), are both required
the fee shall be
Section Base Present Revised
Fees
$315 $328
$734 $763
$52 $54
$105 $109
10% Contract 10% Contract
$105 $109
$105 $109
1/2 original 1/2 original
fee but not fee but not
less than less than
$52 $54
110% of the 110% of the
greater fee greater•fee
Residential
Single Family Dwelling $26 $27
2-4 Unit multiple dwelling $105 $109
Mult res - 4 units & over $315 $328
Office Commercial Convention &
Industrial
Less than 10,000 sq ft (gross) $315 $328
Less than 25,000 sq ft $525 $546
Land Divisions
Lot Line Adjustments
Treat as a minor land
division unless qualified
for an administrative
permit $26 $27
Other Land Divisions $79 $82
City of Morro Bay
Master Fee Schedule
July 1, 1988
Community Development
Type Section
Base Present
Revised
Fees
Other Developments
Emergency Permit
$26
$27
Other Administrative Permits
$26
$27
Other Non -Administrative
$79
$82
Amendments to coastal permit
1/2 original
1/2 original
fee not less
fee not less
than $26
than $26
Time Extensions
SFR and Administrative
$26
$27
Non -Administrative
$79
$82
Other Inspection Fees
Inspections outside of Normal
Business Hours
$19
$20
Reinspection Fees Sec 305g
Hour $19
$20
Inspection for which no fee
is specifically indicated
(1/2 hour minimum)
Hour $19
$20
Additional Plan Review
Required by changes, additions
or revisions to approved plans Hour $19 $20
Penalty Fee
Commencing Construction
without permit (including
plumbing, electrical, 100 plus 100 plus
mechanical, grading or double double
demolition) permit fee permit fee
Electrical Permit see
Mechanical Permits UBC UBC
Plumbing Permits UBC UBC
51,
F
CON2rUh'ZT'_ ^EVEi�OPp'EN'r'r
Electrical - Fee schedule
For Issuing Permits, each
C"' OF MORRO BAY
N.ASTER FEE SCHEDULE
No price changes
For services including one meter:
For services, 600 each vvolts or less, not cer 200 A
For services, above 600 volts or over 200 A, each
For services over 6000 volts or over 100C amperes
I rating, each
Additional meters, each
For receptacles, switches, lighting or other
outleat which current is used or controlled:
First 20, each
For each additional unit exceeding 20
Each 5 feet or fraction thereof F
assembly shall be on multi
oLtlet
For each 5 considered as one outlet
bus duct oriPe' or fraction thereof of plug-in
trolley duct
For fsxt20es sockets or other lamp holding eevlce:
Fir �
each
For each additional unit exceeding 20
Power Apparatus
Fcr mctors; cen_r--
�.ors; �ranszOrmers; rectifiers,
hea-"-OIIOL'S converters; capaicters; industrial
heatine, cooking, or baking ecui -en+;
apparatus as follows: p' and other
Rating in horsepower -�
Kolovclt-;.-mD re_es ( ••_ ) ? lOr att5 ( Lin) , O�
('-',VA)
Up to and including 1, each
Over 1 and not over 3, each
Over 3 and not over 7 1/2, each
Over 7 1/2 and not over 15, each
Over 15 and not over 50, each
Over 50 and not over 100, each .
Over 100, each
$ 10
$ 12.50
$ 25
S 50
S 2
S .50
.20
$ .40
S .50
S .20
S 2
S 3
S S
S 6
S 10
S 20
S 30
NOTE: For ec_ui pment or acpliances having more
than one motor or heater, the sum of the
combined ratings .may be used.
These fees include all switches, Circuit breakers, contractors, relays other directly
related control ecui6ment.
�ese fees are derived from the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and have not changed.
:
CITY OF MORRO BAY
MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
CONNUNITY DEVEELOPMENT
For each high intensity dischargeNlamplce (inchanges
cluding
transformer) and equipment; using
F
-or each fixture
For each projection maching, disolver, etc
Residential appliances
For fixed residential appliances or receptacle
outlets for same, including wall -mounted
electric ovens, counter -counter cooking tops,
electric ranges, air conditioners or coolers,
space heaters, food waste machines, water heaters
clothes dryers, or motor operated appliances, not
exceeding one (1) horsepower (HP_ in rating, each
NOTE: For motor operated appliances over 1 (HP)
see power apparatus
Non -Residential appliances
or self-contained, factory wired, non-residential
appliances not exceeding one (Ifhorsepower (HP),
Kilowatt (KW), or Kilovolt -ampere (F;V ), all rating
including medical and dental a
and ice cream cabinets illuminated
fop, beverage
drinking f litJninzted showcases,
y ountains, vending machines, laundry
machines, or other similar types of equipment each
Signs Ou«,=
Lacnt�nc, and Marquees
For one sign,outline 1 «
containingi,,- g system or marquee
one branch cite , each
For addit' � `���
i iona_ branch circuits within « o t_:ne g h sane sign
n � e s e
light- system, or marquee, each
For egparatelY installed washers, timbers or
other control devices, each
S 2
S 10
S 2
For new construction, single family cwellincs and $ 2
dwelling areas of multi -family dwellincs t:
Go_low_nc _lat rate may apply; this wi h include
11 outlets, range, dryer and any other miscellaneous
circuits 1
Private Swimming Pools per 100 sc,Sft3
For new Private,
residential, in -ground, swimming
Pools _ g-e__�.,ily and multifamil}• occupancies
including a complete system of necessary branch
Circuit wiring, bonding, grounding, under water
fighting, water pumping and other similar electrical
equipment directly related to the operation of a
swimming pool, each
-
S 20
CITY OF N.ORrO EF.'i
MASTER FEE SCI':EDULr
CO!'YMJNITm ' ,'ZL
PE
SECTION BF.SE
!:o price changes
REVISED
Carnivals and Circuses
Carnivals, circuses, c_ other traveling shows
-
exhibitions utzi. g transportable -type rides
booths, displays
andattracor.s
For electric
egenerato_s and electrically driven
rides, each
For mechanical_'y driven ridesS
and wall: throuch
i0
attr actions or displays having electric lighting,
each
For a system ofarea and boc-:h l _ght_�g, each
S 3
5 3
Temporary Power Service
For a temporary service power pole or pedestal
including all
�,
P �e or pedestal -mounted receptacle
outlets
and appurtenances, each
5 i0
For eac:^. extra inspection made necessary by
defective
workmanship or materials
5 15
For the in _
sPecton of any electrical equipment fer which
no fee is herein prescribed for the time
consumed perr.our
S 20
with m4r.477,1 cha__r,
�e 1/2 :^.our or less
S 10
For each roc::. cohtairinc ceiI nc cable 'neat
S 2
An}' person who shall
whicconaence any electrical work for
h a permit is required by -•,
first having this ordinance wit'r.out
a�_.., ob`�a•ne- a permit therefore shall, _
Sl:Jsecuent'y cranted�to obtain a permit, nay a� --
additional fee equal to double the
_ • -e De_;m,_t fee, plus Si00,
__xed by the sectio.1 for such work =rovided that this
sha_l not aPplY to emercency wort y
the Sat" c-; K. when it shall be Droved
-s=a -_on or the Chief Building Inspector that Such
w0r}: Wd5 urgently
O bnecessar% and that it was not p^aa lCal
taln a De rm,it therefore before the com-mencement of work.
_n all such cases, a permit is prat must be obtained as soon as it
ctical to do so, and i= there be an unreasonable
delay ir. obtair. nc such a permit a double fee as herein
Provided shall be charged.
Electrical Plan Check Fee
i whenever electrical 1
Buildinc =_; P ans are recuired by the
O--_czal, Plan check fees shall be in
accordance with the following schedule:
•8 -
1 CITY OF MORRO BAY
MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Fifty percent o: the Electrical Permit fee shall
be required.
t
9�
City of Morro Bay
Master Fee Schedule
July 1, 1988
Police
Type
Section Base
Present
Revised
Fees
Bingo Games Permit
9.12.050I annual
$34
$35
Alarm Systems
Permit
9.22.020A
$6
$6
Connection Fee
9.22.020B
cost
cost
Vehicle Removal
10.48.090
$46
$48
Bicycle License
10.52.020C
$2
$2
Fingerprinting
$10
$10
Copies of Reports
$8
$8
Concealed Weapon with
Fingerprints
$115
$120
Clearance Letter
$10
$10
General Police Permits
$10
$10
10
0
City of Morro Bay
Master Fee Schedule
July 1, 1988
Fire
Type Section Base
Present
Revised
Fees
False Alarm Response
After 2 calls/month call
$75
$78
Remove Gasoline From Underground
tanks 14.60.070
$136
$141
Fire Alarm Inspection
$100
$104
Alarm & Sprinkler Inspection
$126
$131
Helicopter Standby
$105
$109
Underground Fuel Tank Line
Testing
$57
$59
Fueling Boat at Non -Fuel Dock
$105
$109
EMS Assistance in Ambulance
$28
$29
Inspection - Fixed Fire
Extinguisher System over
cooking surface Restaurant
$68
$71
Fire Code Plan Check Fee
$20
$21
Hazardous Material Cleanup
$315
$328
Plus Costs
Copies of Alarm Reports
$2
$2
Patient Transport by Fire
Department
$315
$328
City of Morro Bay
Master Fee Schedule
July 1, 1988
Public Works
Type
Vehicle Registration
Prohibited Vehicle Permit
Advertising Vehicle Permit
Flood Hazard Dev Permit
Subdivisions
Final Map -Tract
+ per lot
Final Parcel Maps with
Improvements
Final Parcel Maps without
Improvements
Inspection
a
Section Base Present Revised
Fees
10.28.130E $26 $27
10.28.140 $26 $27
14.72.110 $315 $328
16.24.050B1
16.28.010
Staking
Restaking
Encroachment Permits (includes
underground utilities)
Regular
13.16.140
Major
Special -A Engineered Structures
Special-B Non -structured
Nuisances - Weed abatement
8.12.090
Streets & Sidewalks Exception
Application
Trees
Deviation Permit
12.08.040
Removal Permit
12.08.040
Utility permit to trim brace
or remove
12.08.110
Business permit to trim,
brace or remove
12.08.120
Destruction or attachment
permit
12.08.130
Mini Bus Rental
Plus the Greater of
Per mile or
Per Hour
12'
$787 $818
$3 $3
$577 $600
$199 $207
Engineer estimate of
construction cost 3%
Time & Material
Time & Material
$52
$34
$367
$382
$210
$218
$75
$78
C.R.
C.R.
$105 $109
$52
$54
$52
$54
$16
$17
$16
$17
$0
$0
$23
$24
$3
$3
$37
$38
City of Morro Bay
Master Fee Schedule
July 1, 1988
Public Works
Type
Section
Base Present
Revised
Fees
Water Service
Application
13.04.070
$0
$0
Connection - City
14.04.100
Cost
Cost
Connection - Outside City
Double Cost
Double Cost
Connection - Subdivision
Owner Expense
Owner Expense
Main Extension Approval
13.04.120
Cost
Cost
Temporary Service Application
13.04.150B
Expenses
Expenses
Meter Installation
$252
$262
Meter Moved
Owner Expense
Owner Expense
Meter Size Change
Owner Expense
Owner Expense
Meter Test
13.04.180
Fast Error More than 2%
$0
$0
Fast Error Less than 2%
$68
$71
Circuses, Carnivals & Travelin
Shows -Fire Hydrant
13.04.240
$19
$20
Reconnection
13.04.310
C.R.
C.R.
Fire Hydrants
Contractor's Use
13.04.360
Meter installation & removal
C.R.
C.R.
Meter Use, each day
$3
$3
Water Use (see current water
rate schedule)
C.R.
C.R.
Water Cross Connection
Certificate of Compliance
13.08.070B
$13
$14
Water Usage
13.04.220
C.R.
C.R.
Sewers
Connection Permit
13.12.010
cost
cost
Extension -pro rated
13.12.050
cost
cost
Use of existing sewer permit
13.12.090
C.R.
C.R.
Use charges
13.12.210
C.R.
C.R
Discharge fee
House trailers & campers
13.12.250A
$0
$0
Tank Trucks & Commercial
13.12.250B
For each truck, for each
1,000 Gallon capacity
$6
$6
Private Facility
13.12.280
$0
$0
Minimum & Availability chg
13.12.090
C.R.
C.R.
C.R. = Council Resolution
13 "
a
City of Morro Bay
Master Fee Schedule
July 1, 1988
Harbor
Type Section Base
Harbor
Bait receiver permit 15.24.050
Dockage waiting list 15.32.020
Commercial
Peasure
Explosives loading & unloading
permit 15.16.030
Emergency towing/remooring
After first occurrence
During working hours
one man, one boat
Additional Charges:
Additional boat and man
Additional man, each
After Working hours
one man, one boat
Additional charges
Additional boat and man
Additional person, each
Boat Pumpouts
After first occurrence
During working hours
one man one boat
Additional charges
Additional boat and man
Additional man, each
After working hours
one man, one boat
Additional charges
Additional boat and man
Additional person, each
T-Pier Hoist
Equipment use, per hr
Unloading fish, per hr
Harbor lease site fees
Changes in lease fees
Changes in lease life
Changes in lease use
Assignments
Lease conversions
Live aboard permit
application
15.40.01OF
i
14
Present Revised
Fees
$0 $0
$250 $250
$75 $75
$33 $34
lhr min
$48
$50
per hr
$47
$49
per hr
$26
$27
4 1/2 hr
min
$142
$148
4 1/2 hr
$136
$141
4 1/2 hr
$121
$126
1 hr min
$48
$50
per hr
$47
$49
per hr
$26
$27
4 1/2 hr
min
$142
$148
4 1/2 hr
$136
S141
4 1/2 hr
$121
$126
$6
$6
$37
$38
$210
$218
$210
$218
$210
$218
$210
$218
$210
$218
$0
$218
11
City of Morro Bay
Master Fee Schedule
July 1, 1988
Harbor
Type
Section Base
Present Revised
Fees
Dockage
City Pier
0 - 49 ft/month
$87
$90
0 - 49 ft/day
$3
$3.00
50 - 74 ft/month
$120
$125
50 - 74 ft/day
$4
$4.17
75 - 99 ft/month
$189
$197
75 - 99 ft/day
$6
$6.57
100 - up ft/month
$324
$337
100 - up ft/day
$11
$11.23
Transient slips/day
$6
$7
City Slips minimum/month
$87
$90
City Slips, per ft/month
$2
$2
City Slips, sublease/month
$95
$99
Offshore mooring/month
$35
$36
City Owned mooring/month
$84
$90
NOTE: All dockage is subject to
10% discount if prepaid for
1 (one) year
City of Morro Bay
Master Fee Schedule
July 1, 1988
County Poundmaster
Type
Section
Base Present
Revised
Fees
Animals and poultry
Animals - Care
7.12.020
Poultry - Care
Disposal
7.04.100
Dogs
Impounding
7.08.090
License fee plus
First occasion
Second Occasion
Third & each subsequent
occasion in calander year
Care
7.08.120
Quarantine
7.08.150
License
7.08.250
Under 4 months
Altered
Unaltered
Late Payment
Cats
Impounding
7.12.010
* As set by San Luis Obispo County Officials
16` ,
City of Morro Bay
Master Fee Schedule
July 1, 1988
Health Officer
Type
Section Base Present
Fees
Kennels and pet shop permits 7.04.120
Radioactive Materials
Transportation permit 8.28.020
well
Application permit 14.68.070
Inspection 14.68.150
* As set by San Luis Obispo County Officials
Revised
17'
'
W
w
•
I
I
I
I
o l4
I
I
I
I O Si
I I
I I
I I
I W I
I
1
I
O I-( 1
ro
I
O�
1 O C
1 7 1
O C I
4J
(U
N
N I
• 0
1 • O
1 0 1
• 0 1
'
U)
C
C
C I
kO x
I l(J x
I O x I
w x I
O
O
0 1
fR
I tR
I to 1
N! 1
z
z
z I
1
I I
I
I
I
E >
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
ro N
1
1
1 I
UI
:i E ro
1
C)
I O
1 O I I
�D 1 I
0 0
I
G1 :I
C
1 0 C
1 N C 1
:
. C 1
O O A
N
N
t)) I
O
.
1 O
I O I
1
3-1 f1'. .i
C
C
C I
n x
1 to x
I r x 1
-1 x 1
a a
o
0
o I
tg
I vt
1 1
w
«� 1
6%
z
z
z I
I
1
I
I 1
I I
1
I
LI Si
I
1
I
1
I I
I I
I
I
O U)
1
O Si
1 U) )-1
I O Yi 1
Ln w 1
-A J-I
I
.--1 ::s
I l- C
1 O C I
Ln;:II
C C
N
a)
a) I
0
1 • 0
1 0 I
O 1
n) N
C
C
C
x
I V' x
I x I
01 x I
U) U
O
O
O I
tR
I fR
I t% I
tR I
z
z
z I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
C
I
I
1
I
I
(U
1
o
I o
1 0 1
o I
.r.. ro Ol N
1
O ())
1 O N
I O W 1
O 0) 1
U C M E)
I
E)
I U)
I • E) I
• N 1
JJ (0 [fix
N
N
(U 1
1 0 5 1
zr I
•r1
C
C
C 1
ri
I r7
I N I
N 1
•Y.
O
O
O 1
to
I ER
1 tR 1
tR I
z
z
z I
1
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
N
I
I
I I
1
U) 4-1 iJ C
1
1
1 I
I
(U
- r 4 4) C N
I
L l L(
1 O Id
1 O li 1
C) )-I 1
Ul
-
JJ -- r-I 0 A
1
N C
1 00 C
1 O::l 1
O C 1
C
N ro 044 U
I
0
1 • 0
1 • 0 1
• 0 1
ro
1�
> x E 4-J iJ
N
N
N I
lO x
1 W x
I r-I x I
r- x 1
U)
O
0 -H •11
C
C
C 1
tf}
1 tR
I •-i I
r-I 1
>
O
i U 3
0
0
0 1
1
1 tR 1
tee I
li
--
z
z
z I
I
I I
I
v
c
I
I
1 I
1
to
Ln
0 iJ C.
I
I
1 1
I
N!
to C C 0
1
1
1 1
O 1
0)
- •r1 0 .i
I
O I-1
1 O Si
1 (fl Id 1
l(l 1.1 1
i."' ro
4.) J-) A U
1
1-1 C
1 N C
1 N C 1
7 I
•ri C
a
W N 41 41
N
U
v I
0
1 • 0
1 • 0 1
0 0 1
v ro
C
> N •.i •rl
C
C
C I
rl x
I Ln x
I kO x I
•--1 x I
A A
E 3
0
0
0 1
N}
1 tR
1 fR 1
tR I
41
z
z
z 1
1
I I
I
r-I N
N
1
I
0 >
U)
N >� 41
C. -ri
1
- r-I C Gl
I
I
I I
O I
O r-I
ro
iJ A O X
I O Si
1 Vl YI
1 O l4 1
ul LI 1
U
)4
a) E-r- U
I O C
1 N C
1 .-I C I
• C 1
r-i ro
> N iJ 4J
U
N
0
I • 0
1 • 0
1 • 0 1
C' 0 1
ro
ro
U) •r1 "A
C
C
C
I Ln x
I r- x
I m x I
-1 x 1
14
C
is U) 3 .4
0
0
0
I tf}
I to
1 ifi 1
69 I
41 0
ro
Q
z
z
z
1
I
I I
I
C
1
I
O ro
C
I
1
I I
1 J~ U
1
J-1
I
I
I I
1 1J >
0
•r1
I
I
I I
I •ri LI
ro
a
o
a
a
a
i w
i v
A 1
w
1 En
ri
•r♦
I
I
I I
I E)
x
Si
I
I
1 1
1 YI N
it
a
I
I
I I
1 (U •.I
JJ
I
I
I I
I E)
I U)
1
I
I
I C r-.,I
HI
I
I
I 0
a)
I O
I
I
I
1
0
I O
I
1
I
I 0 0
b+
U
r-IJ
U
I
I U1
I
4
I ii •
ro
=1
C
1
1 En
1
I f1
I
I •rl ro(v
J:
ro
-1
1
1
1
I
I ri
U
N
ii
• r1
I U
I
I 0
1
I •r♦ C
4
0
U
1 -1
1 N
I Li
I ro
I U U
0)
U
Q•
•rl
I :--1
I Q•
1 a1
1
1 ro J;
(n
U)
C
C
0) a
1 A
I C
I
I JJ
1 44 3
C
0
N
C Yi
1 C
1 0
1 iJ
1 C
1
U
(U
Si
U)
•r1 0
1 a
I w
I C
1 0
1 1 1
N
JJ U
I
I tT
I v
1 A U
1
0)
>I
•rl
iJ
1 U)
I
I ro
1 11 U)
1 O O
ro
O ro
W
ro
r-I
•r1 ri
1 a
1 JJ
I •rl
I •rl 7
I co
41
4 N
r-i
O
@ U
a r-I
w ro
I C
I C
I U)
3 ro
I
V)
4
ro
C
7 ro
U is
1 0
1 U
1 U
I U
1 0 0
o U
11
U
O H
0 x
C •ri
1 Lt
1 ro
1 w
I U)
I In O
-K
-1 U) N
C
04
w
Si
G) U
I 01
1 .11
1 1
1 04 N
I r ul
O0
U
W -
U E)
A •ri
I
I In
I C
I 7 r-I
1 tH f%
J 0m
a
O to
C
1 +1
1 N
1 O
1 OA
I
0 ri
E C
N C
In 7
1 •11
1 34
1 z
I w ro
1 W
44
0)
U
- ro
C E
1 w
1
1
1 01 41
1
C
w N
[ Li
0
1 0
1 v
I N
I •r(
I E-I I
7 )4 r-I
• 4
0 -r-I
(0 N
-H (d
I it
I yJ
I 41
1 iJ 14
1 M
a)
to
4J
W ♦J
41
1 a t
I ro
I (o
I •rl ro
I U) Q
>( 4J >i
ri
> •.i
0) U
U U)
I I
I >
I >
1 444
1 0
J N r-I
•f-1
yJ L)
}J >
C ro
I C
'- I •ri
I •ri
1 0 U
I a
1 ro C
7
-A
U
C
1 0
I li
1 w
I wI
w
-) E h
W
U
>
w
I z 18
l a
1 a
1 04
1 Q
ro N p 1 .) N
ri N Sd N
•.� •H ro G w
a N a N
x %
ro
>4
ro aJ
CANE
ro N N •rl N Q a) N
� N a
A
U
G
0
.14
N >IN b
C ro N >
OQ5 >a
N
N
N
a
•Uiro N11
r-I N N •rl
AwD
a >4
a N
a
4
W
N
O
.1i
a
a
0
O
>a
W
O
N
a
E
N
G
0
z
N
G
0
z
N
G
0
z
I tR tli
I
I
I
I 11
1 0 •.�
I o E
I • f4
1 Ln N
I to,, a
m
L J
N I
N
11 I
11
(} 1
p
•rl I
•�
r-I 1
r-I
I
A 1
A
Y I
11
•rl I
•rl
3 I
I
3
0 0 1
0 0
�A 1
x
1
LI S4 I
LI 1a
as i
as
1
1
0
0 1
In
00 1
O
fl I
O N
N r-1 I
tR
t
41
1 11 1
Lon E
i o f 1 Q
l4
1 LI 1
t- N
1 N N I z
tlf a
1 ri a 1
1 tR I
I
I
I
I
I 4+
I I
I I
1 I
I I
I o }I 1
I o •.I
1 0 •�1 I
I n E
1 • E I
1
1 O w I
1 W
1 1-1 N I
I tl,a
1 +Ra 1
O W 1
O41
O •'I 1
O -H
C' 1EI 1
�o Y4
H N I
N N
tR a I
tl} a
I
1 0 4J
I
1 O 41
I I
1 O 11 1
O J-I
1 Ln -.-I
I O -rl
1 O •.-I 1
O -A
I • E
E
I • E I
• E
N
1 O i4
w
I Ln W I
O 1-I
G
I ri N
I ri N
1 N N I
I`'1 N
0
1 t!T a
I tR a
I tR a 1
z
I
I 1
!4
Q
w
O
G
N
N
ro
W U
G
O h1
>4
0 ul
N
W N
0-14
4 •.)
W U
U
0
N
0
0
A
U
N
U
.-I
A
7
a
N
a
0
O
0
t�
W
O
S4
a
G
0
z
U
I
q I W
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
a
0
0
0
rn
41
G
N
ro
LO
N
I
G
O
z
N
ro
>
sa
a
y,
aJ
7
O
A N
4J N
•-1 :5
3 ro
U
N
aN
OA
b ru
11 YI
•rI ro
wA
O U
s4
a
N
aJ N
ro
U 0
W y1
41 E
w �4
y a
ro x
N W
0
G 11
ro G
w o
0 ro
N
1 UI
N
O ro
o a
O N
o A
Ln
W rl
c 3
ro
N
N r
E u
Y4 N
N 41
a rd
N
N 34
=1 o
1
ro ro
u ro
ro
U E
.r, .1,
rl 4J
A
w -W
1 U
O >,
o c
ro
O
Ln W
H 0
tq
aJ
W N
0
HI U
H
Ena �
0
a
w
Q
a)
ri
>1 :1
rov
�m
A
O U
1, N N
w 0 O rn
w
44
0 s, ri
a)
�A >1
lj N ri
.iron
�)zh
41
v41b
E•r1 •r1 (D
L > N N
IMa 1JpU�iw
aUI
a) a a
Q o
z
A -x
aM
ma
Y, •r1 L4 C
0) 04 0 -H
o ro E
1) EI ri
O
n w
a
a .0
0
si
0
w
0
a)
a
E
I
•
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
U,
ro
w
UI
ro
m
a) 1 OO
1 00
C I o In
1 o In
O I
1
z 1 en 'i
I IPI N
I to �R
1
I
I
I ,A tR
I
�
�
1
v
C
0
z
2
U
C
H
>r (n
ro c
as a)
W
O•r,
>4 4J
>4 •r1
0 U
E
w o
O •rl
C
>0
14
U
a) O
34 r I O
,14
ro ro n
A H •-+
U �tf
�O
ooN
ri • 7
ri 04
,RPr a ,
N
aN
� r-I
o O
uO
rn�
U
1) N
w4.
U
0.11
s.1 ri
aA
1 =s
cw
0
z
a
z
a) O
)-1 ri O
•r♦ A •
ro ro 1n
A H i
C,o
0o N
ri C
• c+l r--1
us en w
m
a
7
O
14
0
41
C
0
ro
.r4
N
4-1
C4'
-1
m
>
.r1
w" 20
U�
ro
w
4J �,
av
-H,.)
a) N
a) PG
a�
110
Oo
o
.o
a
z
0 O
S4 ri O
•ri A •
ro 10 1n
A H ri
U � ,l�
110
O O N
Ln • 7
• In ri
,a w GL
G
O
z
a) a
w ::I
roo
> )4
.r1 0
>•,
w
i
1
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
1
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
U
ro
w
a
0
-1
,1
.r1
b
s,
ro>
ww
w U O
-.I r-I O
ro.0
x roLn
UHr1
1�11,n
00
Oo N
C
r•1 O ri
,a ri c4
w
I;
O
.H
ro
v
U
0
a
1
0
0
Ln
69
ro
a)
� ro
E -C
•r1 J.)
w E
1, L,
O w
rn
c v
x
a +d
ro
H O
C
>r O
C
a v
ro ar
1, N
0 N
-) ro
0 a
0
.0 a)
W A
I ,
r1
O •rl
0 3
o (n
O ri
In ro
,R •r1
0
rl 1,
ro ro
+-J E
C
a) sa 0
� b
•�1 a
� ro
U a)
E
d • •rt
r-I r-I tJ
Ara
m l% >,
H C ++
G) •r1
1 LI U
ou>1
O C C
a) ro
o E
Ill a w
r-1 •r1 0
rn 7
0 1n
W N N
O
H1 U
H
In a «
O
w
w
Q
1 1
1 I
•
•
I
I I
I 1
I I
I I
I I
I I
1
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I 1
I 1
1 1
U
I
I I
I I
C
I
1 I
I I
v E
v
1
v
I v I
v
1 v I
�4 O
G
I
G
I G I
G
I G I
v 0
O
1
O
1 O 1
0
1 O I
44 1%
z
I
z
I z I
z
I z 1
C
1
I I
I I
O
I
I I
1 1
U
1
I I
I I
E
I
I
I I
1 I
I I
1 I
O
I
1 I
I 1
O
N
1
O 1
I O LI 1
O
1 O :`I 1
I-1
C
1
O 0
1 m 0 1
10
C
1 0 1
In
O
I
O
I O 1
. O
1 . O I
Ul
z
I
r x
I x 1
H x
1 r x 1
ro
1
tR
4A
I 4R I
ri
1 I
Nf
%
tR I I
U
I
1 1
I 1
I
E
I
I
I 1
I I
I
I I
O
1
I I
1 1
v 0
v
I
O S-1
1 O 14 1
O ld
1 O S4 1
CP S-I
C
1
O 0
1 O 0 1
O 0
1 ll0 1
G Ol
O
I
• O
1 O I
O
.
I O I
G E
zi
1
x
1 N x 1
.T.
1 .7'. 1
O (aI
4
tR
I r-I I
H
CN
I N I
a U•
I
I
I tR I
I 1
w
I tR I
I I
I v
I
I
I
1 I
I I
I I
I 1
I
1 I
b V1
•r1 rn
v
1
o s4
1 o s4 1
In N
1 o s4 I
v >r
4.) 0
C
1
O�:l
1 0=1 I
r z
1 0 7 I
> (v
r-I a
0
1
• 0
1 • 0 1
• 0
1 • 0 1
)4 11
34
z
I
.--I x
I U) x 1
CO x
1 N x 1
v a
0
1
H
I '--I I
H
I N I
N
PI
1
tR
1 tR I
t/i
1 tR I
b
I
1 I
1 1
lT C
1
1 1
I I
G ro
E
I
I I
I I
-rl A
G
1
1 1
1 1
N
W •rl
I
I I
I I
A N
0 )4
v
1
O S4
1 O w I
lf) id
I O 14 I
>
O
G
1
O C
I O G 1
N C
1 a 7 I
r-I -H
w 4J
0
1
O
1 0 1
0
I • 0 1
0 -1
ri •rt
z
I
t+) •1-'
I r x I
ri x
I N x I
.0
ro b
1
ri
1 H 1
N
m 1
O ro
x 7
1
tPr
1 HT I
tR
1 44 1
U
•Q
I
I I
I I
r4 14
I
I I
1 1
ro 0
E
I
I
I I
1 1
I I
I I
L'O
7
1
1 I
I
0 v
•ri
1
1 1
I I
O>
14
U
1
O w
1 O 14 1
O S4
1 O i4 1
4 )-I
O
G
I
O G
I O C 1
O G
1 to G 1
41 v
4J
0
1
• 0
1 • 0 1
• 0
1 • 0 I
•rl N
•rl
z
I
H x
1 O] x 1
1f) x
I N x I
3
ro
1
N
I N I
m
I U9 I
V)
7
I
tR
I tR 1
tR
I tH I
Ul •rl
Q
I
I I
I I
i1
>1
I
I I
I I
V) 0
41
1
1 1
1 1
7 A
•r1
1
1
1
0
O
R(
I
i>1
I U I
q
I W I
4J ri
.
-rl
I
I I
I I
•rl ro
L4
I
I I
I 1
•rl C
r-I
I
1 I
I I
U v
ro
U
I a 1
1 1
(0A
4.)
C
1
1 C 1
1 41 1
44 3
G
H
I
1 O I
4-1
1 C 0.1 1
v
v
I
I i-I I
G
1 O to 1
1 I
r--I
C4
a
-
I
1 V' I
N
I Y. G I
>1 ::l
7
>v 0
I
N
I 1
b
1 41 ro 1
O O
roro
w
0
ro G
I
aU1
I 4 I
rl
1 •4 0 1
OO
31 N
v
14
Rl N
1
C r4
I G I
co
1 3 1
,C
41
V'
N
1
0 0
1 v 1
N
1 U I
O O
0 U
C
0 •rl
1
L4 O
1 b 1
w
I VI r4 1
V) o
14 U) 00
v
w
P 4J
1
M 4
1 •r1 1
1
1 a A I
-i 1P
14 07
U
0
)4•rl
I
U
I VI I
C
I 7 (d I
tv tR
0 0 O)
0 U
1
41 UI
I v 1
0
1 0 4J I
E v ri
>r
N
E
1
• 4
1 a. 1
z
1 LI •.� 1
W
44
44
a
S4
1
w U
I I
I
w -
•rl
w 0
1
0 •ri
I N I
v a
I ro I
E4 1
0 w 1-4
G
0 -H
I
)•1 r4
1 4-) 1
4J G
1 4.J .0 I
H
1 v
7
C
I
a.o
I ro I
rd O
1 4 U 1
En Q
>r 4J >y
>v v
I
I C
I > 1 I
> S4
1 44 1
0
4-1 (n ri
41 U)
I
C W
1 •r1 •. I
-H 0
1 0 ro 1
LL
.rt ro 7
0
•H
I
0
1 w I
14
1 S4 I
W
J x 1']
U
U
I
z
1 a 21 I
QI
1 PI I
q
0 •
RESOLUTION NO. 47-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MORRO BAY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR
FUNDING FROM THE GENERAL ALLOCATION OF THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
FOR A HOUSING REHABILITATION PROJECT
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, on February 8, 1988, the City Council of the City
of Morro Bay, California, held public hearing to solicit public
input on the community's needs and project options which could be
addressed through the 1988 Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) program; and
WHEREAS, based on the discussions at those meetings, the
City has prepared an application for CDBG funds for a housing
rehabilitation program; and
WHEREAS, on May 9, 1988, the City Council did hold a duly
noticed public hearing on said housing rehabilitation program
proposal and grant application; and
WHEREAS, field surveys, the community input, the City's
adopted Housing Element all identified a serious need for
rehabilitation within that portion of the City's existing housing
stock which is affordable to low income households, which could
be significantly and usefully addressed through CDBG funds; and
WHEREAS, the City, in recognition of the seriousness and
urgency of the rehabilitation need, will contribute to the
proposed program by augmenting the CDBG funds with its own
general fund monies, staff time and the waiver of usual permit
and inspection fees.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay, California, as follows:
1. That the City Council has reviewed and hereby approves the
citizen participation plan for compliance with federal
statutes and that the plan was followed for this
application; and
2. That the City Council has reviewed and hereby approves and
authorizes submittal of an application for CDBG funds in the
amount of $520,000, for a housing rehabilitation program;
and
3. That the City Council has reviewed and hereby agrees to
comply with all assurances executed in connection with the
application and, if awarded, the grant; and
City Council Resoikion No. 47-88
Page 2
4. That the City Council hereby authorized and directs the City
Administrator to execute said application and to act on the
City's behalf in all matters pertaining to this application;
and
5. That the City Council hereby authorizes the following
contributions toward the proposed rehabilitation program as
augmentation to the CDBG funds, if approved:
a. $10,000 from the City's general fund to be used for
program administration.
b. $3,000 in staff time from the Community Development and
Finance Departments divided between program
implementation and general administration.
C. Waiver from all otherwise applicable building permit
and inspection fees estimated at $5,000.
PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Morro
Bay at a regular meeting held thereof on the 9th day of May,
1988, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: Sheetz
ATTEST:
�.�-
ityCler--k ----------
AR T�, C
RESOLUTION NO. 45-88
A RESOLUTION REJECTING THE BID ON PROJECT
NO. P.W. 87-09, POLICE STATION RENOVATION
T H E C I T Y C 0 U N CI L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to Morro Bey Municipal
Code Section 3.08.100J, has the discretion to reject all bids
presented; and
WHEREAS, the City Council may readvertise, or proceed,
without further public bidding, as provided in Morro Bay
Municipal Code Chapter 3.08.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that in accordance with Section
3.08.100J of the Morro Bay Municipal Code, the City Council hereby
rejects all bids on Project NO. P.W. 82-09.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Morro Bay at a regular meeting held thereof on the 9th day of
May, 1988 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: Sheetz
ATTEST
%
ARDITH DAVIS, CITY CLERK
"DALE REDDELL, MAYOR
J
Q
F-
O
F-
�
q9
N
,
tl
I
q
0
�
q
r
I
9
ql
N
al
I
s
N
I
8
I
�
V
W
F._.
a
w
0
o
D
==
n v
U
0
z
m
0
J
Q
F-
O
H
N
1
1
Bi
N
N
N
i
gI
Nil
e'
A
I Ii
8
QO
�
I
d
HV
WQ
w
z�
~
z
N
w
o
z
J
m
w w
D
�
I
v..
O
T
z
O
F
a
FE
U
U)
w
0
Q
6
z
i�
•
p
►
J
Q
�
F-
o
H
n1
I
i
t
�
I
I
I
OI
v_
o
IR
N
�I
�
I
c
i
I
fl
N
I
o
♦
•
w
FW
Za
Wa
,a
U)
W
Ll
w w
w i
,n
w
6
RESOLUTION NO. 44-88
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN
FOR THE CITY OF MORRO BAY
THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the adoption of a Storm Drain Master Plan is prudent
in order to provide for adequate infrastructure capacity and to
serve as a support document for the approved City General Plan and
its elements; and
WHEREAS, the firm of John L. Wallace and Associates, has been
contracted to prepare a Storm Drain Master Plan for the City of
Morro Bay; and
WHEREAS, on May 9, 1988, the City Council of the City of
Morro Bay considered the adoption of said Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, as a result of consideration the Master Plan, as
prepared by John L. Wallace and Associates, has been determined to
be in the best interest of public health and safety; and
WHEREAS, the Morro Bay Planning Commission by the adoption of
Planning Commission Resolution No. 05-88, did find the Master
Plan, as submitted, to be in conformance with the approved City
General Plan, its elements and City land use policies.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay does hereby adopt the Storm Drain Master Plan,
as prepared by John L. Wallace and Associates.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Morro
Bay at a regular meeting held thereof on the 9th day of
May, 1988 by the following vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: Sheetz
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
DALE REDDELL, Mayor
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 43-88
RESOLUTION OF THE MORRO BAY CITY COUNCIL CALLING A
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 1988 FOR THE PURPOSE OF ELECTING
CERTAIN OFFICERS OF SAID CITY; AND REQUESTING THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY TO CONSOLIDATE
SAID ELECTION WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION
TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 1988;
AND OTHER ELECTION MATTERS AS REQUIRED BY LAW
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, under the provisions of the laws relating to gen-
eral law cities in the State of California, a regular general mu-
nicipal election shall be held every two years for the election
of two (2) members of the City Council of said City for the full
term of four years, and for the election of one (1) Mayor of the
City Council of said City for the full term of two years; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Morro Bay Municipal Code Section
2.09.010, it is desirable that said general municipal election be
consolidated with the statewide general election to be held on
November 8, 1988 and that within the City of Morro Bay the
precincts, polling places and election officers be the same, and
that the San Luis Obispo County Clerk canvass the returns of the
general municipal election and that said statewide general elec-
tion and general municipal election be held in all respects as if
there were only one election.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Morro Bay City Council
as follows:
1. There is hereby called and ordered in the City of Morro
Bay, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, on Tuesday,
November 8, 1988, a general municipal election of the qualified
electors of the City, to be consolidated with the statewide gen-
eral election, to vote for the election of two (2) members of the
City Council for the full term of four years, and for the elec-
tion of one (1) Mayor of the City Council for the full term of
two years; and
2. Pursuant to the requirement of Section 23302 of the
Elections Code, the San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors
be and is hereby respectfully requested to consent and agree to
the consolidation of a general municipal election with the
statewide general election to be held on Tuesday, November 8,
1988; and
Resolution No. 43-88
Page Two
3. The County Clerk is hereby authorized to canvass the
returns of said general municipal election to be consolidated
with said statewide general election, and said election shall be
held in all respects as if there were only one election, and only
one form of ballot shall be used; and
4. Said Board of Supervisors is hereby requested to issue
instructions to the County Clerk to take any and all steps neces-
sary for holding of said consolidated election; and
5. The City of Morro Bay recognizes that additional costs
will be incurred by the County by reason of this consolidation
and agrees to reimburse the County for any such costs attributed
to Morro Bay's consolidation with the statewide general election;
and
6. The City Council hereby determines if two or more per-
sons running for the same City office receive an equal and the
highest number of votes resulting in a tie vote, the person
elected to City office shall be resolved by lot; and
7. The City Clerk of the City of Morro Bay is hereby di-
rected to file a certified copy of this resolution with the San
Luis Obispo County Clerk and the County Board of Supervisors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Morro Bay City Council at a regu-
lar meeting thereof held on the 9th day of May, 1988 on the fol-
lowing vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: Sheetz
��o C�
DALE REDD L, Mayor�
ATTEST:
ARD TH DAVIS, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 41-88
RESOLUTION TO AWARD BID NO. PW 87-11 FOR WEED ABATEMENT
MOWING TO JACK R. BRIDWELL OF AIASCAOERO, CA.
T H E C I T Y C 0 U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City of Morr❑ Bay had publicly advertised and
opened bids on April 25, 1988, for said mowing services; and
WHEREAS, the City Administrator recommends the award to Jack
R. Bridwell of Atascadero as the lowest responsive and
responsible bidder; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay that Jack R. Bridwell, of Atascadero be hereby
awarded the contract for weed abatement mowing in the amount of
$S.75 per hour per foot width of cut.
PASSED AND ADOPTE❑ by the City Council ❑f the City of Morro
Bay at a regular meeting thereof held the 9th day of May, 1988,
by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: Sheetz
ATTEST:
�lLCfL ��
ARDITH DAUIS, City Clerk
❑ALE REDDELL, Mayor
RESOLUTION NO. 40-88
RESOLUTION AWARDING RFP NO. PW88-120 TO UPDATE THE CITY OF
MORRO BAY TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN, 1988-1993
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Morro Bay
adopted on September 26, 1983 a Short -Range Transportation
Development Plan (TDP) for the period FY 1983/84 through FY
1987/88; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary and in the public interest to
update said TDP to provide effective public transit
planning, management, and operations and guidance to the
City in making decisions regarding the delivery of public
transit services for the period FY 1988/89 through FY
1992/93; and
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo Area Coordinating Council
(SLOACC), at the City's request, applied for and received an
Urban Mass Transportation Act (UMTA) Section 8 Planning
Grant to update said TDP in the amount of $9,000; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted on June 22, 1987 a
final budget for FY 1987/88; and
WHEREAS, said budget included $3,000 in local matching
funds pursuant to the requirements of said Grant; and
WHEREAS, the total project budget for said TDP update
is $12,000; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted on August 24, 1987
Resolution No. 100-87 approving an Assignment Agreement
between the City and SLOACC to initiate this project and
allow the City to select the project consultant, manage the
project, and provide oversight to the total effort; and
WHEREAS, proposals to update said TDP were solicited
pursuant to UMTA Section 8 Grant requirements; and
WHEREAS two responses were received by 5:00 p.m., April
29, 1988, the deadline for submittal of proposals; and
WHEREAS, said proposals have been reviewed by City and
SLOACC Staff and JKaplan and Associates has been determined
to be the most responsive transit consultant and best suited
to perform the required work in the amount of $12,000.
0
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Morro Bay to award RFP No. PW88-120 to update
the City's TDP for the period FY 1988/89 through FY 1992/93
to JKaplan and Associates in the amount of $12,000 and
authorize the City Administrator to sign the necessary
contract and all other documents related to said project.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Morro Bay at a regular meeting held thereof on the 9th Day
of May, 1988, by the following vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: Sheetz
DALE RIDDEL'Mayor
ATTEST:
K�,�,Z,ew Z&e�
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 38-88
RESOLUTION AWARDING BID NO. PW88-113
FOR WATERLINE MATERIALS AND FIRE HYDRANTS
THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay is starting Phase III of its
Waterline Replacement Program; and
WHEREAS, bids for waterline materials and fire hydrants were
solicited pursuant to Section 3.08 of the City of Morro Bay
Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the bid format provided that vendors bid each of six
material groups (A, B, C, D, E, and F) separately, and further
provided that the City reserved the right to make partial awards
of said bid using any combination vendors; and
WHEREAS, eleven bids were received and publicly opened at
2:00 p.m., April 22, 1988; and
WHEREAS, said bids have been reviewed and the three vendors
indicated in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference, have been determined to be the lowest responsible and
responsive bidders for the material groups indicated and at the
respective amounts listed in said Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the respective bid awards total $128,309.34 and
sufficient funds are available to proceed with the purchase of
said materials.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay to award Bid No. PW88-113 for waterline
materials and fire hydrants pursuant to Exhibit A in the amount of
$128,309.34.
Y
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Morro
Bay at a regular meeting held thereof on the 9th day of
May, 1988 by the following vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, -Odell, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: Sheetz
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
DALE REDDELL, Mayor
EXHIBIT A
LOWEST RESPONSIBLE AND RESPONSIVE BIDS
BID- NO. PW88-113/WATERLINE MATERIALS AND FIRE HYDRANTS
The lowest responsible and responsive bid for each material group
specified in Bid No. PW88-113 is as follows:
MATERIAL
GROUP
A
B
C
D
E
F
DESCRIPTION
PVC Pipe
Other Pipe
Fire Hydrants
Cast Iron Fittings
Meter & Vault Boxes
Service Fittings
VENDOR
P.E. O'Hair
P.E. O'Hair
Groeniger & Co.
P.E. O'Hair
P.E. O'Hair
Parkson/Bakersfield
AMOUNT*
$55,988.00
2,674.20
26,142.71
28,837.98
3,251.71
11,414.74
TOTAL $128,309.34
* NOTE: Award amounts reflect 2% discount for payment within ten
days after receipt of invoice and acceptance of materials by City
for all vendors except Parkson/Bakersfield.
RESOLUTION NO. 37-88
RESOLUTION AWARDING BID NO. PW88-112
FOR ONE NEW 1-TON TRUCK WITH UTILITY BODY
THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted on June 22, 1987 a
final budget for FY 1987/88; and
WHEREAS, said budget included $15,000 for the purchase
of a service truck with utility body for the Department of
Public Works/Street and Water Divisions; and
WHEREAS, bids for a new 1-ton truck with utility body
were solicited pursuant to Chapter 3.08 of the Morro Bay
Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, six responses were received and publicly
opened at 2:00 p.m., April 21, 1988; and
WHEREAS, said bids have been reviewed and Palla
Equipment, Inc. of Paso Robles, California has been
determined to be the lowest responsive and responsible
bidder at $14,915.95; and
WHEREAS, the City's 1969 1/2-ton Chevrolet pickup truck
with toolbox, Serial No. CS149Z850459, License No. E535195,
Equipment No. 0007, is deemed to be surplus City property to
take advantage of its trade-in value as applied to the
purchase price of the new truck.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Morro Bay
City Council to award Bid No. PW88-112 for one new 1-ton
truck with utility body to Palla Equipment, Inc. of Paso
Robles, California in the amount of $14,915.95 and declare
as surplus City property the 1969 pickup truck as described
hereinabove.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Morro Bay at a regular meeting held thereof on the 9th day
of May, 1988 by the following vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: Sheetz
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
DALE REDDELL, Mayor
"i1(�-
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
6
RESOLUTION NO. 36-88
RESOLUTION OF THE MORRO BAY CITY COUNCIL
RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 55-81, AND
AUTHORIZING THE ADJUSTMENT AND
SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY
THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay is a member of the Central
Coast Cities Joint Powers Agreement (CCCJPA) for insurance
purposes; and
WHEREAS, as a result, the City receives the services of an
independent CCCJPA adjuster and investigative service who will
defend claims filed against it; and
WHEREAS, for the expedient settlement of claims necessary to
minimize costs of the City, it is necessary that the Staff and
the Adjuster have specified authority on behalf of the City to
immediately enter into Settlement Agreements without prior
authorization of the Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Upon investigation and determination by the CCCJPA adjuster
for the City, that the City appears to be partially or fully
liable by reason of an incident or accident resulting in a
claim against the City, the Adjuster shall have the
authority to enter into Settlement Agreements on claims that
do not exceed One Thousand and no/100ths ($1,000.00)
Dollars. This authority may be suspended or reduced at any
time by the City Administrator.
2. When a claim against the City exceeds One Thousand and
no/100ths Dollars ($1,000.00) and it is determined that the
City appears to be partially or fully liable for the claim,
the City Administrator shall have the authority to enter
into a Settlement Agreement to settle the claim up to the
amount of Ten Thousand and no/100ths Dollars ($10,000.00).
Any such Settlement Agreement shall be signed by the City
Administrator.
3. All proposed settlement of claims in which the Staff cannot
reach concurrences to settle as provided in 2 above, or
which amount to Ten Thousand and no/100ths Dollars
($10,000.00) or more, shall be referred to the City Council
for determination.
4. The Claims Adjuster employed by the CCCJPA shall be
authorized to reject any claim filed against the City
pursuant to and on the appropriate grounds set forth in
Title I, Division 3.6, Part 3, Chapter 2 of the Government
Code of the State of California.
5. Resolution No. 55-81 is hereby rescinded in its entirety.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Morro
Bay at the regular meeting thereof held this 9th Day of May,
1988, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: Sheetz
Dale Reddell, Mayor
ATTEST:
Ardith Davis, City Clerk
Qp&/ iysg was - as
RESOLUTION NO. 35-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY
ORDERING PLACED ON THE BALLOT OF THE NEXT CITY ELECTION
AN INITIATIVE MEASURE ESTABLISHING AFFORDABLE SENIOR
HOUSING DENSITY BONUSES AND OTHER INCENTIVES
THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MORRO BAY, CALIFORNIA
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the
City of Morro Bay as follows:
1. On April 29, 1987 the City of Morro Bay was
presented with an initiative petition signed by at least ten
percent of the registered qualified voters of the City
requesting that said petition be submitted to a vote of the
people at the next election: and
2. The next City election will be held in November,
1988; and
3. Based on the above findings, the City Council of
the City of Morro Bay does hereby order placed on the ballot
of the next election the initiative measure submitted to the
City on April 29, 1987 entitled "AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE
MORRO BAY LAND USE PLAN (LUP) AND APPLICABLE ZONING
ORDINANCES IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH AND PROMOTE AFFORDABLE
HOUSING FOR MORRO BAY'S SENIOR CITIZENS", to read as
follows:
CITY OF MORRO BAY
measure " "
Shall an initiative be enacted amending the Morro Bay Land
Use Plan and Applicable Zoning Ordinances to establish
affordable senior housing density bonuses and other
incentives?
Yes
No
4. This initiative measure shall pass only if a
majority of the votes cast by voters voting on the measure
are yes votes and shall, if passed, take precedence over any
other conflicting measure receiving less votes in this
election; and
k .
RESOLUTION NO. 35-0
Page 2
5. The City Council hereby directs the City Attorney
to prepare an impartial analysis of the measure, not to
exceed 500 words in length, showing the effect of the
measure on existing law and the operation of the measure.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Morro Bay at a regular meeting held thereof on the 25th day
of April 1988 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
P�_
ARDITHali�AVIS,-CITY CLERK
INITIATIVE PETITION TO L:NACT CITY ORDINANCE
TO: City Council of the City of Morro Bay, State of California
WE, the undersigned, are registered and qualified voters of the City of Morro Bay,
County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, constituting not less than fifteen
percent (15%) of the registered qualified voters of the City, and present to the City
Council this petition and respectfully request that the following proposed ordinance of
the City of Morro Bay be passed without alteration by you, or be submitted to a vote of
the people at a special election pursuant to California Election Code Sections 4010 and
4020.
The proposed ordinance reads as follows:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE MORRO BAY LAND USE PLAN (LUP) AND
APPLICABLE ZONING ORDINANCES IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH AND PRQvYJTE
AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR MORRO BAY'S SENIOR CITIZENS.
WHEREAS, a substantial segment of the population of Morro Bay consists of persons
55 years of age or older; and
WHEREAS, Morro Bay urgently needs affordable housing for its senior citizens and
such housing does not presently exist in adequate quantity to'meet the needs of Morro
Bay's citizens.
THE PEDPLE OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: All parcels or properties presently designated in the City of Morro Bay
as OR-2u, "R-2 PD", "R-3" or "R-3 PD" shall not be rezoned to commercial or
rnanufacturing unless such rezoning is first approved by the voters 'of Morro Bay at a
special or regular election.
In order to promote the construction of affordable senior housing, any
low to moderate Income cocmiunity housing project for seniors of five (5) or more units
to be built on property zoned uR-2" or nR-2 PD" shall be permitted the same number of
units allowable on a parcel of equal size and zoned uR-3n:
In order to promote the construction of affordable senior housing
projects, the City may establish a separate -allocation of water, equivalepiCies
designated for community housing projects for seniors.
SECTION 2: Upon adoption, this ordinance shall be immediately submitted to the
California Coastal Commission for certification as an Amendment to the Land Use Plan
for the City of Morro Bay.
SECTION 3: If any provision of this ordinance is adjudged invalid by.a court of
competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed separate, distinct and severable
and adjudication shall not affect the ruining provisions of the ordinance.
SECTION 4: This ordinance shall supersede all other ordinances and LUP policies in
conflict therewith.
The following is a true and correct copy of the printed notice of intention and
accompanying statement required pursuant to California Election Code Section 4002. .
NOTICE OF INTENT senior citizens. The* subject
TO CIRCULATE PETITIONVroparty Is gspecially. sufta-'
NOTICE IS HEREBY CIY- N for senior citizens hous-
'EN - of, ths' Intention of the. Ing because of Its close proz-
persons..whoss names ap• imitr'lo Morro .Bay's civic
pear hereon to circulate a. center, the.•SBnlor. Center,
toUtlon within the City of the Community Recreation
,Morro Bay for the purpose of Building. Morro Bay Library,
provldlnB a Clty' Ordinance and. nearby ahoppin`: The
which willimend the current U.S. Gaper ant of pousjng
tablish .and promote low to
-.moderate InbomC senior citl•
me nanoicappea rental noun.
ing In Morro Bay, Tho.pro-
-zen �o -Said property
ppoosed Initiativs petition .will
Iseilitate the construction of
Sall.
i cons sG• 01' approzlmstely
live acres, al .vacant lend
new affordable senlorttitizen
behind .the4afeway Sher;
housing to meet the, urgent.
Morro Bases
Oro:Center, adjacent.: o
needs of senior
If • adopted' by a
Marro Palms Mobile LodgQ
dl: TbnothY,e
citizens.
majority of the,rarlstered
and Gtholk
•Churen,." ol'y's. •,..
A'statement *'f"the '•ra-
'sons
voters of the'City; of Morro
Bay, thrproposa ordinance'
for the proposed action
as contempplated In said peti.
tion is a lollows: The senior
.wllI be submitted to the
California <Castal'Commis•'
.. abn for*approval. and certifb'-
citizens In Morro Bay urgent•
an,
cation- as .an vmandmonDdo^
ly need low to moderate
Income
the Morro Coastal Plan. •i'
housing and such .
housing for senior citizens
does
Dated: 10/30186
WWARREN M. DORN � •.
/s/EARL E.
not presently ex it In
adequate to
JIM• RODGER;
YdJOHN LEMONS
quantity most
the needs of Morro Bay's
Nov. 3, 1986 . dv686rC
RESOLUTION NO. 34-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY
ORDERING PLACED ON THE BALLOT OF THE NEXT CITY ELECTION A
MEASURE AMENDING SECTION 17.50 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE
CREATING AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUSES AND INCENTIVES
THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MORRO BAY, CALIFORNIA
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the
City of Morro Bay as follows:
1. The Council finds and declares as follows:
A. It is in the best interest of the City to promote
and facilitate the provision of low and moderate income
housing consistent with provisions of Government code
Section 65915 and the Housing Element of the city's General
Plan.
B. It is in the best interest of the City to establish
guidelines to assist prospective developers of low and
moderate income housing including requirements for City
approval of density bonuses and other incentives of
significant financial value.
2. To accomplish this purpose the City's ordinance
creating and establishing such density bonuses and
incentives should be submitted to the voters to be amended
to ensure that such ordinance cannot be repealed nor amended
in the future without a vote of the people.
3. Based on the above findings, a measure to amend the
Municipal Code, Chapter 17.50 creating and granting
affordable housing density bonuses and incentives to
prohibit future amendment or repeal without a vote of the
people, is hereby ordered placed on the ballot of the next
regular election held by the City of Morro Bay to read as
follows:
City of Morro Bay
measure " "
Shall Chapter 17.50 of the Municipal Code which creates
and grants affordable housing density bonuses and incentives
be amended to prohibit future repeal or amendment of said
Chapter 17.50, without a vote of the people?
Yes [ ]
No [ ]
Resolution 34-88 • •
April 25, 1988
Page 2
4. This measure shall pass only if a majority of the
votes cast by voters voting on the measure are yes votes and
shall, if passed, take precedence over any other conflicting
measure receiving less votes in this election.
5. The City Council hereby directs the City Attorney
to prepare an impartial analysis of the measure, not to
exceed 500 words in length, showing the effect of the
measure on existing law and the operation of the measure.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Morro Bay at a regular meeting held thereof on the 25th day
of April 1988 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
H` DAVIS, City Clerk
MEASURE
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE MORRO BAY MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT
CHAPTER 17.50 AND TO PROHIBIT THE REPEAL OR AMENDMENT OF
THAT CHAPTER WITHOUT A VOTE OF THE PEOPLE
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY DO ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The Morro Bay Municipal Code is hereby amended
to add Chapter 17.50 establishing affordable housing density
bonuses and incentives as more specifically set forth in
exhibit A attached hereto.
SECTION 2: This Chapter shall not be repealed nor amended
without a vote of the people.
SECTION 3: This measure shall, if passed by the people,
take precedence over any other conflicting measure receiving
less votes in this election and shall supersede all other
ordinances and LCP policies in conflict therewith.
SECTION 4: If any provision of this ordinance is adjudged
invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision
shall be deemed separate, distinct and severable and such
adjudication shall not affect the remaining provisions of
the ordinance.
CHAPTER 17.50
AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUSES AND INCENTIVES
Sections:
17.50.010 Purpose And Intent
17.50.020 Definitions
17.50.030 Single Family Residential District Density Bonuses
And Incentives
17.50.040 Multiple Family Residential District Density
Bonuses And Incentives
17.50.050 Condominium Conversion Density Bonuses And
Incentives
17.50.060 Direct Financial Contribution
17.50.010 Purpose And Intent.
The purpose and intent of these regulations are:
A. To promote and facilitate the provision of low and moderate
income housing consistent with provisions of Government Code
Section 65915 and the Housing Element of the General Plan.
B. To -establish guidelines to assist prospective developers of
low and moderate income housing including requirements for
City approval of density bonus' and other incentives of
significant financial value.
17_50.020 Definitions
For the purposes of this chapter, the following words shall
have the following meaning:
A. "Single Family Residential Density Bonus" means a density
increase of at least 25 percent over the otherwise maximum
allowable residential density under the applicable zoning
district (R-A, or R-1) Land Use Element of the General Plan
and Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan. The density bonus
shall not be included when determining the number of housing
units which is equal to 10 or 25 percent of the total. The
density bonus shall apply to housing developments consisting
of five or more dwelling units.
B. "Multiple Family Residential Density Bonus" means a density
increase of at least 50 percent over the otherwise maximum
allowable residential density under the applicable zoning
district (R-2, R-3, or R-4) and Land Use Element of the
EXHIBIT A
1.0 P/Z UA Gb-E7 - I,ensiOv Bonus •
Page 2
General Plan or Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan. The
density bonus shall not be included when determining the
number of housing units which is equal to 20 or 50 percent
of the total. The density bonus shall apply to housing
developments consisting of five or more dwelling units.
C. "Condominium Conversions Density Bonus" shall mean an
increase in units of 25 percent over the number of
apartments, to be provided within the existing structure or
structures proposed for conversion.
D. Low to moderate income is defined in Health and Safety Code
Section 50093, lower income in Health and Safety Code
Section 50079.5, and in the City's Housing Element of the
General Plan.
Section 17.50.030 Single Family Residential District Density
Bonuses incentives.
(A) When a developer of housing agrees to construct at least (1)
25 percent of the total units of a housing development for
persons and families of low or moderate income, or (2) 10
percent of the total units of a housing development for
lower -income households, or (3) 50 percent of the total
dwelling units of a housing development for qualifying
residents, as defined in Section 51.3 of the Civil code, the
city shall either (1) grant a single family residential
density bonus or (2) provide other incentives of equivalent
financial value.
(B) A developer may submit to the city a preliminary proposal
for the development of housing pursuant to this section
prior to the submittal of anv formal requests for general
plan amendments, zoning amendments, subdivision map
approvals, conditional use permits, coastal development
permits, or other discretionary entitlements. The city
shall, within 90 days of receipt of a written proposal,
notify the housing developer in writing of the manner in
which it will comply with this section. Such determination
by the City shall be based on a public hearing and approved
by the City Council.
(C) incentives may be considered by the City, at its option, as
an alternative or partial alternative to the density bonuses
defined above, or as a means of encouraging a developer to
provide a higher percentage of low and moderate income
housing in the project.
(D) Incentives utilized by the City- may include some combination
of reduced fees, modified development standards, expedited
processing procedures, provision of water at reduced cost,
direct financial subsidy, or grant assistance or other
1.CP/ZDA 0E-E7 - ilIDity Bonus •
Page 3
incentives described in Government Code Section 65913.4.
These incentives will be designed to provide "equivalent
financial value" by project basis through cooperation and
negotiation with the developer.
(E) If a developer agrees to construct both 25 percent of the
total units for persons and families of low or moderate
income and 10 percent of the total units for lower -income
households, the developer is entitled to only one density
bonus although the city may, at its discretion, grant more
than one density bonus.
Section 17.50.040 Multiple Family Residential District Density
-Bonus and_TncenTfiyes
(A) When.a developer of housing agrees to construct at least (1)
50 percent of the total units of a housing development for
persons and families of low or moderate income, or (2) 20
percent of the total units of a housing development for
lower -income households, or (3) 100 percent of the total
dwelling units of a housing development for qualifying
residents, as defined in Section 51.3 of the Civil code, the
city shall either (1) grant a multiple family residential
density bonus or (2) provide other incentives of equivalent
financial value.
(B) A developer may submit to the city a preliminary proposal
for the development of housing pursuant to this section
prior to the submittal of any formal requests for general
plan amendments, zoning amendments, subdivision map
approvals, conditional use permits, coastal development
permits, or other discretionary entitlements. The city
shall, within 90 days of receipt of such written proposal,
notify the housing developer in writing of the manner in
which It will comply w1i:h tlli5 Section. Suchdetermination
by the City shall be based on a public hearing and approved
by the City Council.
(C) Incentives may be considered by the City, at its option, as
an alternative or partial alternative to the density bonuses
defined above, or as a means of encouraging a developer to
provide a higher percentage of low and moderate income
housing in the project.
(D) Incentives utilized by the City may include some combination
of reduced fees, modified development standards, expedited
processing procedures, provision of water at reduced cost,
direct financial subsidy, or grant assistance or other
incentives described in Government Code Section 65913.4.
These incentives will be designed to provide "equivalent
financial value" by project basis through cooperation and
negotiation with the developer.
CP'"LOA O&-6- - Dens • Bonus
Page 4
(E) If a developer agrees to
total units for persons
income and 20 percent of
households, the developer
bonus although the city
than one density bonus.
construct both 50 percent of the
and families of low or moderate
the total units for lower -income
is entitled to only one density
may, at its discretion, grant more
Section 17.50.050 Densitv Bonuses And Other Incentives For
-- - - - --
Coriaom>nlum Conversions.
(A) When an applicant for approval to convert apartments to a
condominium project agrees to provide at least 33 percent of
the total units of the proposed condominium project to
persons and families of low or moderate income, or 15
percent of the total units of the proposed condominium
project to lower income households as defined in the Housing
Element of the General Plan, and agrees to pay for the
reasonably necessary administrative costs incurred by the
city, the city shall either (1) grant a density bonus or
(2) provide other incentives of equivalent financial value.
The City may place such reasonable conditions on the
granting of a density bonus or other incentives of
equivalent financial value as it finds appropriate,
including, but not limited to, conditions which assure
continued affordability of units to subsequent purchasers
who are persons and families of low and moderate income or
lower income households.
(B) For purposes of this section, "other incentives of
equivalent financial value" shall not be construed to
require the city to provide cash transfer payments or other
monetary compensation but may include the same types of
incentives described in 17.50.030 (D) above.
(�1 iill applicant for a=-roval to convert apartments to a
condominium project may suomit to the city a preliminary
proposal pursuan to.this section prior to the submittal of
any formal requests for subdivision map approvals. The city
shall, within 90 days of receipt of a written proposal,
notify the applicant in writing of the manner in which it
Will comply with this section. Such determination by the
city shall be based on a public hearing and approved by the
City Council.
(D) An applicant shall be ineligible for a density bonus or
other incentives under this section if the apartment
proposed for conversion constitute a dousing development for
N'niCh a density bonus or other incentives were previously
provided by the city.
(E) Nothing in this section shall be construed to require the
city to approve a proposal to convert apartments to
condominiums.
.. Pa 'lgee 5i%' 5onus •
Pa5
17.50.060 Direct Financial Contribution
Where there is a direct financial contribution to a housing
development pursuant to this chapter through participation
in cost of infrastructure, write -down of land costs, or
subsidizing the cost of construction, the city, shall assure
continued availability for low- and moderate -income units
for 30 vears. Deed restrictions or other binding legal
measures that will control resale of the units in such a
manner as to assure the long term affordability of these
units to low and moderate income persons shall be prepared
by the City and accepted by the housingdeveloper as a
condition of project approval.
RESOLUTION NO. 33-88
A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE PROHIBITION OF ON -STREET PARKING IN THE
VICINTIY OF THE INTERSECTION OF QUINTANA ROAD AND KENNEDY WAY
THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay City Engineer has conducted a
focused traffic engineering study of the subject intersection; and
WHEREAS, the results of said study indicate the necessity to
restrict on -street parking at the subject intersection; and
WHEREAS, the Morro Bay Street Advisory Committee reviewed
said study and concurred with its results.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay that on -street parking at the subject
intersection be prohibited as follows:
On Quintana Road: a length of ten feet west from the
northwest curb return of the intersection of Kennedy Way;
On Kennedy Way north side: a length of twenty feet south
from the curb return of the intersection of Quintana Road and a
length of eight feet north from the existing driveway located
ninety two feet south of said curb return: and
On Kennedy Way south side: a length of twenty five feet
south from the curb return of the intersection of Quintana Road
and a length of six feet north from the existing driveway located
a distance of eighty feet south of said curb return.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the city Engineer be authorized
and directed to cause the installation of appropriate curb
markings to enforce this Resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Morro
Bay at a regular meeting held thereof on the 25th day of
April, 1988 by the following vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RESOLUTION NO. 33-�
ATTEST:
_--
DALE REDDELL, Mayor
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
I
!%XHIBIT
V
ISroPI
t
w
dl-rf 4 MOXXO BAY'
PeOP054ED OV5TFET
IAMAIu� PK70141tlMOAJ
klE Jley WAY
AT
6)U1AfrAAJA MAD
4-88
NO. 31-88
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
PUBLIC AREA USE PERMIT NO. 207
FOR SPECIAL HARBOR USE BY
CAL POLY CREW TO HOLD A REGATTA ON
APRIL 23, 1988
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, Morro Bay Municipal Code requires Council autho-
rization of special uses in the harbor; and,
WHEREAS, Cal Poly Crew is sponsoring a regatta on April 23,
1988 from 8:00 a.m. - 12:00 noon; and,
WHEREAS, Cal Poly Crew has met all conditions and require-
ments found in the Code to allow use of the harbor channel from
harbor marker 10 to harbor marker 20; and,
WHEREAS, the City requires Cal Poly Crew to reimburse the
City for the cost of Harbor Patrol assistance in halting normal
harbor traffic.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay authorizes the Director of Recreation and Parks
to issue a Public Area Use Permit for the Cal Poly Crew regatta
allowing special use of the harbor from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon
on April 23, 1988.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Morro
Bay at a regular meeting held on this llth day of April, 1988 by
the following vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
'::�—�DALLE_REDDELL
u. •:
ATTEST:
ARDITH DAVIT -
CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 30-88
RESOLUTION OF THE MORRO BAY CITY COUNCIL
OPPOSING THE ENACTMENT OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2802
THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, Assembly Member Hill has introduced Assembly Bill 2802 into
the California State Legislature; and
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 2802 would, essentially, reverse the recent
Appellate Court decision in Cox Cable Television v. County of San Diego;
and
WHEREAS, the effect of Assembly Bill 2802 would be to forbid a local
government from collecting any otherwise authorized property tax, on the
fair market value of the franchise interest owned by a cable operator, if
the collection of such a tax, coupled with the collection of any franchise
fees owned by the cable operator, would exceed 5% of the gross revenues;
and
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 2802 would provide a new, and unnecessary,
windfall to cable television companies, and would deprive local communities
of an opportunity to share appropriately in the profits generated by cable
television companies operating within the community; and
WHEREAS, in the City of Morro Bay, and in other parts of the State of
California, it is important that cable television operators be required to
contribute back to the community some reasonable share of what are
extremely significant profits generated from within the community, profits
which are not being reinvested, in any significant degree, in either better
service quality, or extension of service, or in any other benefit to the
local community; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Assembly Bill 2802 represents, in
the opinion of the City Council, unfair special interest legislation, which
is of direct detriment to the public, and which will disproportionately
benefit a few financially privileged cable television operators; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, Assembly Bill 2802 should be defeated by the
State Legislature.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Morro Bay at a
regular meeting of said Council held on the 13th day of June 1988, by the
following vote of said Council:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Dale ReddellI Mayor
Ardith Davis, City Clerk
RESOLUTION 29-88
APPROVING CONSENT TO SUBLEASE
OF LEASE SITE 73
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay is the lessor of certain
property on the Morro Bay waterfront, described as Lease
Site 73; and
WHEREAS, Morro Bay Marina is the lessee of said
property; and
WHEREAS, said lease provides that the consent of City
shall be obtained to any sublease of said property or
portion of said property; and
WHEREAS, said lessee has entered into a sublease
agreement with William DeCarolis and Frank St.Dennis, doing
business Visions, a copy of which sublease agreement has
been presented to the City of Morro Bay.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Morro Bay does hereby consent to the sublease of
Lease Site 73 to William DeCarolis and Frank St.Dennis,
doing business Visions, subject to receipt and approval of
all required documents by the City Attorney.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Morro Bay at a regular meeting held on this llth day of
April, 1988 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddel-
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
REDDELL, MAYOR —
ATTEST:
ARDITH DAVIS, CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION 28-88
RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSENT TO SUBLEASE AGREEMENT
OF LEASE SITE 71
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay is the lessor of certain
property on the Morro Bay waterfront, described as Lease
Site 71; and
WHEREAS, Morro Bay Marina is the lessee of said
property; and
WHEREAS, said lease provides that the consent of City
shall be obtained to any sublease of said property or
portion of said property; and
WHEREAS, said lessee has entered into a sublease
agreement with David Van Eck and Victor Graziano, doing
business as The Morro Bay Music Box Company, a copy of which
sublease agreement has been presented to the City of Morro
Bay.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Morro Bay does hereby consent to the sublease of
Lease Site 71 to David Van Eck and Victor Graziano, doing
business as The Morro Bay Clock Company, subject to receipt
and approval of all required documents by the City Attorney.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Morro Bay at a regular meeting held on this llth day of
April, 1988 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
���
AfTT i�DAVIS, CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 27-88
RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSENT TO SUBLEASE AGREEMENT
OF PORTIONS OF LEASE SITE 80-81W TO MORRO BAY SEAFOOD,
AND APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO MASTER LEASE AGREEMENT
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay is the lessor of certain property
on the Morro Bay waterfront, described as Lease Site 80-81W; and
WHEREAS, Morro Bay Fisheries is the lessee of said property; and
WHEREAS, said lease provides that the consent of City shall be
obtained to any sublease of said property or portion of said property;
and
WHEREAS, said lessee has entered into a sublease agreement with
Morro Bay Seafood, a copy of which sublease agreement has been pre-
sented to the City of Morro Bay; and
WHEREAS, certain code repairs and lease maintenance is necessary
to bring the leased premises into good and sanitary order and
condition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Morro Bay does hereby consent to the sublease of portions of Lease
Site 80-81W to Morro Bay Seafood subject to receipt and approval of
all required documents by the City Attorney; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council approves and autho-
rizes an Addendum to Master Lease Agreement with Bayside Fisheries,
Inc., setting forth specific Lessee obligations and timetables for
code compliance and maintenance repairs.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Morro Bay City Council at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 25th day of April, 1988 on the following
vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
LE RED LL, Mayor
ATTEST:
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
e � •
•
ADDENDUM TO LEASE
n This Addendum to Lease Agreement is made this
CO day of 4- , 1988, by and between the City of
Morro Bay, a 'municipal corporation of the State of
California, herein called CITY, and BAYSIDE FISHERIES, INC.
(a California corporation solely owned by Martin and
Winifred Tomich, husband and wife), herein collectively
referred to as TENANT.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY and TENANT made and entered into a
written lease, herein called "said Lease" on the 8th day of
November, 1985, wherein TENANT leased from CITY lease sites
80,. 80W, 81, and 81W located at 715 Embarcadero Street,
Morro Bay, California; and
WHEREAS, said lease states in paragraph 13 as follows:
13. TENANT shall, at its sole cost, keep and maintain
the premises and all improvements of whatever kind that
may be now or hereafter erected, installed, or
otherwise made thereon by TENANT, in good an sanitary
order and condition, and shall make all necessary
repairs and alterations thereto. The term "repair and
maintenance" also includes replacement. TENANT
specifically agrees to replace and rebuild at its sole
cost and expense as necessary. It is agreed that
replacement and rebuilding are included within the term
"maintenance" and are to be performed by TENANT at
TENANT'S sole cost and expense.
TENANT shall keep the premises and all
improvements clean and clear of rubbish, trash, and any
extraneous material not needed for the business of said
TENANT to the satisfaction of the CITY; upon the
failure of said LESSEE to comply with the provisions
hereof at any and all times, then said CITY may, at
said CITY'S option, notify said TENANT by a written
notice, of the failure of said TENANT to so comply; if
within fifteen (15) days of the receipt by said TENANT
of said notice, the said TENANT fails to clean and
clear said real property to the satisfaction of said
CITY, CITY shall have the right to clean the premises
at TENANT'S sole cost and expense; and
ADDENDUM TO LEASE • •
Page 2
WHEREAS, said lease states in paragraph 14 as follows:
14. TENANT covenants and agrees to keep in proper
maintenance and repair and replace and rebuild all
bulkheads or seawalls in the Morro Bay Harbor abutting
the demised premises at TENANT'S sole cost and expense;
and
WHEREAS, certain repairs and maintenance are necessary
to bring the leased premises into good and sanitary order
and condition; and
WHEREAS, TENANT was notified of such necessary repairs
and maintenance on or about October 16, 1986 and has failed
and refused to and does continue to fail to perform such
needed repairs and maintenance; and
WHEREAS, because of such failure TENANT could be held
to be in default of said lease; .
NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows and the
lease is hereby modified as follows:
1. TENANT shall perform and complete the following
repairs within thirty (30) days from the date of this
Addendum:
A. Stop or plug the discharge and sluice pipe
draining into the bay.
B. Repair the broken horizontal brace between two
pilings.
C. Clean the parking lot drain and replace the
flexible plastic drain pipe on the revetment with a
rigid conduit.
D. Place electrical longends at the south side
and end of the pier near the crane.
E. Remove or repair barge or float system
currently submerged beneath wharf adjacent to
revetment.
2. TENANT shall repair the revetment and correct the
revetment erosion problem beneath the wharf within the
following time schedule:
A. Within ninety (90) days of the date of this
Addendum TENANT shall submit to CITY for approval,
complete and detailed engineering plans for the total
ADDENDUM TO LEASE • •
Page 3
repair of the revetment and correction of all erosion
problems beneath the wharf on said leased premises.
B. TENANT shall make any corrections to said
plans required by CITY's Department of Public Works
within three weeks of receiving written notice from
CITY of necessary corrections.
C. TENANT shall submit said plans, together with
all documents, fees and applications necessary to
obtain approval and/or any necessary permits from the
Corp of Engineers, to said Corp of Engineers within two
weeks of receiving final approval of said plans from
CITY.
D. TENANT shall have obtained all necessary CITY
permits and shall commence construction of all
necessary repairs to the revetment on said leased
premises within thirty (30) days of receiving either
notice advising that no permit is needed or of
receiving a permit from the Corp of Engineers. In the
event such notice or permit has not been received
within six months from the date of this Addendum,
TENANT shall provide to CITY a written explanation of
such delays.
E. TENANT shall complete all revetment repairs
and shall correct all revetment erosion problems
beneath the wharf within sixty (60) days of receipt of
permission from the Corp of Engineers to proceed.
3. Failure by TENANT to comply with these stipulated
time schedules or to meet the stipulated time deadlines set
out hereinabove shall constitute a material breach of this
lease and shall constitute grounds for termination of this
lease. However, TENANT shall be excused for any delays in
meeting time schedules set forth in the Addendum caused by
the act of CITY, the act of any agent of CITY, the act of
any governmental authority, the act of any public enemy,
acts of God, the elements, war, war defense conditions,
strikes, or walkouts. TENANT shall, however, use reasonable
diligence to avoid any such delay and to resume construction
or other required activities as promptly as possible after
the delay. A delay in obtaining necessary permits caused by
failure of TENANT to supply necessary information to
governmental agencies or caused by TENANT's failure to
timely or adequately apply for such permits or approvals
shall not be excused under this paragraph.
4. Both TENANT and CITY agree that if TENANT fails to
complete the repairs and construction or to perform any
other activity required in the Addendum within the
ADDENDUM TO LEASE • •
Page 4
stipulated time schedules set out hereinabove, this lease
may be terminated at CITY's option, without further
notification on the part of either party.
In all other respects, said lease shall continue in
full force and effect.
MADE AND AGREED TO by the parties on the date first
written hereinabove.
CITY OF MORRO BAY
r:MAY;OR -
by
ATTEST:
ARDITH DAVIS, CITY CLERK
Approved as to Form
TENANT
-
9h-LPO ir'C i
r "
♦41
to
J tD
0 � 2
c
O N
2 n
O O
a o
x ro o
N C ro .4 F V C7
N •.d J.1 /.t i
Enro 'ti7 H
_ Coro > C0
A 4 "'c O
N � C 1•+ --1 �7
tn
O 7 N
C N N 7 r4�j
U to
0 N > N aY�
U � C •a
>4 N v .a N a
3 C N N J En 1.r O
a N N En C j O vNi
O N - w N N ro Q W
U N N V N > u tll �7
N N H N •a N m
z v N N. N Cu N N tP Q O
I-4 .-1 N C , N 7 -4 V1
N u A O 1-4 A U w f
Oa b LO '7 cn N GN'.
>+ N z'
d O
$ 4 O
a �4 o a
W N
cn
w A cn 5
7 O
w
�••i cn N O
cn u N a
F O N 7
O a N N Z
N > H
N •.•I cn
N N N
N 7 w N N
-4 .-4 U N N
A U O N tT N
:5 X GZ to C N
fn N O, N -4 N
A 4 A
7 ro 7
AFIMX'INh1
RESOLUTION NO. 26-88
'UTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE SITES 82-85/82W-85W
FROM CABRILLO ENTERPRISES TO ROSE'S LANDING INC., A
CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the existing lessee, Cabrillo Enterprises is
current in all lease obligations; and
WHEREAS, Cabrillo Enterprises has requested assignment
of the leased premises; and
WHEREAS, Rose's Landing Inc., A California Corporation,
has been identified as an acceptable tenant; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that consent is hereby
given by the City Council of the City of Morro Bay for
assignment of Lease Sites 82-85/82W-85W under existing terms
and conditions to Rose's Landing Inc., A California
Corporation, subject to receipt and approval of all required
documents by the City Attorney.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk
are hereby directed to sign any and all required documents
to complete this Agreement on behalf of the City of Morro
Bay.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Morro Bay at a regular meeting held thereof on this filth day
of April, 1988, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
------------------
D• E REDD8LL,MAYOR
ATTEST:
40z- :ztiR
ARD TH DAVIS, CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 25-88
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CITY OF MORRO BAY'S
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND AND STATE TRANSIT
ASSISTANCE CLAIMS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988/89
THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, revenues derived from 1/4-cent of the 6% retail
sales tax collected statewide are apportioned to local governments
to be used for transportation purposes pursuant to the
Transportation Development Act of 1971; and
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay's apportionment of Local
Transportation Funds (LTF) for FY 1988/89 is $182,651; and
WHEREAS, in addition, the City of Morro Bay's apportionment
of State Transportation Assistance (STA) funds is $504 and the
apportionment of Operator Revenues, pursuant to Section 99314, is
$16; and
WHEREAS, the City intends to use its LTF and STA revenues for
operational expenses associated with Morro Bay Dial -A -Ride,
Central Coast Regional Transit Authority, and Regional Handicapped
System pursuant to the State of California Public Utilities Code,
Article 4, Sections 99260, 99260(a), 99313 and 99314, and the
California Administrative Code, Section 6730(a); and
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay hereby states a preference for
using additional LTF and STA, if such funds become available, for
the City's Dial -A -Ride operations, provided however, that the City
reserves the right to file an amended claim.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay to approve the City's LTF and STA claims for
Fiscal Year 1988/89 and direct Staff to submit to the San Luis
Obispo Area Coordinating Council the necessary claim documents.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Administrator is hereby
authorized and directed to sign all claim documents.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Morro
Bay at a regular meeting held thereof on the filth day of
April, 1988 by the following vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
�•REDDtLL,
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 24-88
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN
CLARICE E. RIGHETTI AND THE CITY OF MORRO BAY
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, Clarice E. Righetti is the owner of a parcel
on which the City of Morro Bay has constructed a municipal
water storage tank and appurtenances; and
WHEREAS, a memorandum of lease for construction and
maintenance of said water tank and appurtenances was
approved by the Morro Bay City Council on May 21, 1985 and
recorded at the office of the San Luis Obispo County
Recorder May 22, 1985 at Volume 2709 of Official Records,
Page 782; and
WHEREAS, it was later determined that said memorandum
of lease was an inappropriate document for the purposes of
the City of Morro Bay and Clarice E. Righetti; and
WHEREAS, a revised agreement was negotiated and agreed
to on April 8, 1987; and
WHEREAS, said revised agreement is intended to
supersede the previous memorandum of lease.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Morro Bay does hereby authorize the recordation
of said revised agreement between Clarice E. Righetti and
the City of Morro Bay; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that said revised agreement
shall supersede and render null and void the memorandum of
lease recorded at the office of the San Luis Obispo County
Recorder at Volume 2709 of Official Records, Page 782.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Morro Bay at a regular meeting held on the Day of March 28,
198$ by the following vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None ^
ABSENT: None /
--DZS REDDELL, Mayor
ATTEST:
a���45-
ATIDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
Recording requested by
City of Morro Bay
When recorded mail to
City of Morro Bay
Attention Public Works
595 Harbor Street
Morro Bay, CA 93442
EASEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 8th
day of April , 1987, by and between the
CITY OF MORRO BAY, a municipal corporation, hereinafter
called "CITY" and CLARICE E. RIGHETTI, hereinafter called
"OWNER".
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, CITY is in need of adequate supplies
of water for purposes of fulfilling the needs of CITY; and
WHEREAS, CLARICE E. RIGHETTI is the holder of
record title of Assessor's Parcel Number 73-084-13; and
WHEREAS, CITY desires a non-exclusive easement
across a certain portion of Assessor's Parcel Number 73-084-13
for the purpose of constructing and maintaining a water
storage tank and related appurtenances. The proposed water
tank site, which is described on Exhibit "A" as Parcel 1,
is located on Assessor's Parcel Number 73-084-13; and
WHEREAS, OWNER and CITY have mutually agreed that,
in return for the consideration hereinafter provided, CITY
shall be granted said non-exclusive easement for the period
hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by the
Parties hereto as follows:
1. OWNER grants to CITY the right and privilege
to a non-exclusive easement and right of way for the purpose
of constructing, installing, maintaining, repairing and
operating a water storage tank, related equipment, and pipelines
and to install such underground telemetry lines over said
pipelines as may by CITY be required for carrying out and
enjoying the rights and privileges granted hereunder on
said property, being shown and designated as the shaded
area on attached map marked Exhibit "A" for a period of
twenty-five (25) years from and after the date hereof. It
being also understood that adequate and sufficient space
shall be available on said property to adequately service,
maintain, repair and replace said water storage tank, telemetry
lines, underground electrical lines and pipelines and that
CITY shall have the right of way across Owner's property
for such purposes. CITY shall have the right to enter on
the property for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing,
repairing, replacing and maintaining the water storage tank
and the utility lines serving the tank.
2. CITY may at CITY'S option terminate this easement
agreement at any time upon ninety (90) days prior written
notice to OWNER, such an early termination by CITY shall
also terminate CITY'S obligation to make payments accruing
subsequent to said cancellation.
3. Upon termination of this Agreement, or in the
event CITY determines to cancel this Agreement, then CITY
shall have the right to remove the water storage tank and
all pipelines, telemetry lines, pumps, pumphousing and equipment.
4. During the period of time this Agreement is
in effect, CITY agrees to pay to OWNER the sum of Two Thousand
and Four Hundred Dollars ($2400.00) per year, payable yearly,
on or before May 1st of each year, to OWNER or her administrators,
executors, or assignees. It is understood that payments
for this non-exclusive easement are due to CLARICE E. RIGHETTI.
5. CITY shall at CITY'S option have the right
to renew this easement agreement for an additional twenty
five (25) years on the same terms and conditions upon giving
written notice to OWNER.
6. CITY agrees to save OWNER harmless from all
liability and damage resulting from CITY'S use and operation
of said water storage tank and related appurtenances, including
any construction, installation, maintenance and repair authorized
to be made hereunder.
7. OWNER hereby waives any claim of liability
of the part of the California Coastal Commission or any
other public agency for any damages from hazards such as
erosion or landslides not proximately caused by CITY'S
installation or operation of said water storage tank and
related appurtenances.
8. OWNER warrants and represents that she is the
sole holder of record title to the property, and that all
Persons who have or claim an interest in Parcel 1 described
on Exhibit "All have signed this Agreement. This Agreement
binds the heirs, successors, grantees, and assigns of the
parties.
9. CITY shall have the right to record this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto
set their hands the day and year first above written.
CITY OF MORRO BAY
A Municipal Corporation
CLARICE E. RIGIfETTI
STATE --]I
i� COUNTYOOF- SANALUIS OBISPO I
SS.
ROFFICIAL SEAL.
RAE M. CRILL
NOTARY PUBLIC CALIFORNIA
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
my Comm. Expires Sept 12, 1989
ACKNOWLEDGMENT—General—WDlmus Form 233CA—Rev. 5-82
01982 WOLCOTTS, INC. IDr,ce class 891
On this 7th day of APRTL , in the year 19---a7
before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared
1a,,1r..., - --
«�sePN��� i�3(r10
(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person_ whose name_
i s subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that ale_
executed it.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary Public in and for said State.
0.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
1i NUTMEG WATER TANK SITE
MORRO BAY, CALIFORNIA
(November 2, 1984)
Parcel I
Being a portion of Lot 19, Rancho Morro Y Cayucos in the County of
San Luis Obispo, State of California; as shown on map of Rancho
Horro.Y Cayucos in Book A, Page 160 of Maps, September 28, 1875.
Beginning at the northwesterly corner of said Lot 19, as shown on
Record of Survey, recorded in Book 36, Page 41 RS; thence along
the westerly line of said Lot 19, S 000 40' 00" W 15th thence
to the
southeasterly corner of Lot 28 of Rancho Morro Y Cayucos and also
being the northeasterly corner of Morro Del Mar No. 2;
thence along said line S 000 40' 00" W 6.00, to the true point of
beginning; thence S 880 02' 01" E 18.111; thence
S 810 29' 50" E 41.25' to a*curve concave to the southeast having
a radius of 56.04' and to which point a radial line bears
S 720 56' 48" W; thence northerly 95.37' along said curve through
a central angle of 97 31' 07'; thence along a ,curve concave to
the southwest having a radius of 55.20' to whichcu radial line
bears N 050 04' 18" E, thence southerly 127.96' along said curve
through a central angle of_1320 4B' 55"; thence alonga
non -tangent line S 760 32' 45" W 25.96'; thence,
N 790 45' 18" W 32.511; thence S 790 39' 35" W 31.631; thence
N 83 36' 53" W 47_63' to a point on the westerly line of said Lot
19; thence N 000 40' 000 E 31.60' to the true point of beginning
and containing 0.226 acres.
EXHIBIT A
VOL 2709 09 PAGE 784
�' •Si � �l1 `ram ..
,_h�/.-.- � • �� .�. r.: ,ram': ri •,� •. �i -
I Vie', �•� \= -- ' - �,
�v 4Fk5 p T.4. tV
.,• \ Jay)! � •— � I�;
Nj
.� 1' .'; �7�` •r RECiDER'S'MEMO:
POOR REPRODUCTION DUE'
c OUALITY OF-,�RIGINAL DOCUtv,,
DOoODO
4The Cloy
--
n
NORRO-BAY _ -
6oeLaAJMOD Gn.UJI'mi,
VOL 2709 P�cE 785
_-
�t: l27. 96 • � \
OF /NG . i i 3
-V 37R.W0 / \ .389.3
w. —E ` •Ei r
• 9C)0
5�
RP')
1 - ---- - - ---- 3
/
I
' ♦ • � � � CURVE
9 '31'07 ;
.04 .
R GwLy M/N• qA�JLI,q 'Yy C.
. 2 11-7 K /
.xp. ram-
v �0 P^�
p BC
/ m I
P to/
!
' RECOR R'S ME /
@: POOR REP ODUCTI DUE TO
k
QUALITY r ORIC>I DOCUM T /
�n n
/ i' M47LN E1fLb I � EC
w g/✓:B WIRE •N I 4 M47[N Ex"
k .
s , 1 t9o. •� , I `
Min/. ARE/ 774R
Li'LXX Ft7R 'O.'= 9. 3
+\
.� o
3'1 \ E
DID OF DOCUMENT
VOL 2709 PAGE 786
RESOLUTION NO. 23-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY
ORDERING PLACED ON THE BALLOT OF THE NEXT CITY ELECTION
A -MEASURE TO AMEND THE BUSINESS LICENSE TAX PROVISIONS
TO PROVIDE FOR AUTOMATIC ANNUAL ADJUSTMENTS.
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
CITY OF MORRO BAY, CALIFORNIA
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the
City of Morro Bay as follows:
Section 1. The Council finds and declares as follows:
(A) Cities are authorized to levy Business License taxes
under Government Code §37101 and Business and
Professional Code §16000 et. seq.
(B) The Business License Tax is a General Tax, and the
proceeds of this tax are used for General Government
Purposes.
(C) Other General Taxes are adjusted automatically and such
adjustments are inherent in the method of taxation.
For example, Property Tax increases with the value of
the property, within the parameters of Proposition 13;
Sales Tax increases with the price of items sold;
Transient Occupancy Tax increases with the price of
rooms rented.
(D) To maintain parity with other General Taxes and support
a proportionate share of Government services, Business
License Tax should also be adjusted proportionately
each year.
(E) Proposition 62 was passed by the voters of California
November of 1986, requiring voter approval for any new
or increased taxes.
Section 2. Based on the above findings, a measure to
amend the business license tax rate provisions to provide
for automatic annual adjustments, is hereby ordered placed
on the ballot of the next regular election held by the city
of Morro Bay to read as follows:
City of Morro Bay
Measure " "
Shall an Ordinance be enacted entitled "An Ordinance of
the City of Morro Bay to amend various sections of Title 5
of the Morro Bay Municipal Code relating to Business License
Tax Rates and authorizing automatic annual adjustments
commencing June 30th, 1986."
Yes [ ]
No ( ]
Section 3. The measure shall pass only if a majority of
the votes cast by voters voting on the increase are yes
votes.
Section 4. The City Council hereby directs the City
Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis of the measure,
not to exceed 500 words in length, showing the effect of the
measure on existing law and the operation of the measure.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Morro Bay at a regular meeting held thereof on the 28th day
of March 1988 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
DALE REDDELL, Mayor
kVWY*YW
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY
TO AMEND VARIOUS SECTIONS OF TITLE 5 OF THE MORRO BAY
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO BUSINESS LICENSE TAX RATES
AND TO AUTHORIZE AUTOMATIC ANNUAL ADJUSTMENTS.
The People of the City of Morro Bay do ordain as follows:
Section 1. Authority to Adopt Measure
This ordinance and the tax authority herein is enacted
pursuant to the provisions of §37101 of the California
Government Code and §1600 et. seq. of the California
Business and Professions Code, and in compliance with the
California Constitution Article XIII A, Section 4 and
Article 3.7 of Chapter 4 of Part 1, of Div. 2 of Title 5 of
the California Government Code commencing with §53720.
Section 2. Purpose
It is the intent of this ordinance to provide annual
adjustments in the Business License Tax equal to the change
in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) to maintain parity with
other taxes which increase or decrease automatically with
inflation.
Section 3. Type of Tax
Business License Tax is a General Tax as defined in
Government Code §53721. The tax is imposed for General
Governmental Purposes.
Section 4. Annual Adjustment of Rates
Section 5.04.050 of the Morro Bay Municipal Code is
amended to read:
There are hereby imposed upon the businesses, trades,
professions, callings and occupations specified in this
title license fees as established annually in the Business
License Rate Schedule.
Each year by June 30th the Business License Rate
Schedule will be adjusted by the change in the Consumer
Price Index (CPI), from March of the previous year to March
of the current year. The percentage adjustment for any
given year shall be based upon the average monthly index for
twelve months ending March 31st. The Consumer Price Index
referred to herein is the Consumer Price Index (all items
indexes, all urban consumers) for Los Angeles - Long Beach -
Anaheim, California, compiled and published by the United
States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1968
Base Year = 100 (hereafter called Index.) If the United
States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
shall cease to compile and make public the Index as now
constituted and issued, but shall substitute another index
in its place, then said substituted index shall be used in
place of the Consumer Price Index referenced herein.
This Section shall not be construed to require any
person to obtain a license prior to doing business within
the City if such requirement conflicts with applicable
statutes of the United States or of the State of California.
Section 5. Effective Date
The annual CPI adjustments authorized by this ordinance
shall commence on June 30, 1986 in accordance with
previously adopted rate schedules.
Section 6. Severability
If any provision of this ordinance or the application
thereof to any person or circumstances is held to be
invalid, such invalidity shall not affect any other
provision or applications, and to this end the provisions of
this ordinance are declared to be severable.
0
22-88
APPROVING CONSENT TO SUBLEASE
T ON LEASE SITES 129W-133W
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay is the lessor of certain
property on the Morro Bay waterfront, described as Lease
Sites No. 129W-133W; and
WHEREAS, Milt Guggia Enterprises, Inc. is the lessee of
said property; and
WHEREAS, said lease provides that the consent of City
shall be obtained to any sublease of said property or
portion of said property; and
WHEREAS, said lessee has entered into a sublease
agreement with Cordero/Winston & Company, a copy of which
sublease agreement has been presented to the City of Morro
Bay.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Morro Bay does hereby consent to the sublease of
Lease Sites No. 129W-133W to Cordero/Winston & Company
subject to requirements attached as "Exhibit All.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Morro Bay at a regular meeting held on this 28th day of
March, 1988 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
IJAR.r. ArJJIJIILL, W!\SV1(
ATTEST:
d .Oe, C- ,X /e'er.-�, -
ARDITH DAVIS, CITY CLERK
11*4104:314ri:1
Requirements Associated with Consent to Sublease
Lease Sites 129W-133W
The approval of Resolution 22-88 by the city Council of the
City of Morro Bay is conditioned on the following
requirements:
1. Fender piling repairs to be completed in conjunction
with the revetment repairs prior to October, 1988 if no
Corps of Engineers permit is required for the revetment
and the project can proceed immediately; or in the
event that the Corps of Engineers requires a permit for
the revetment repairs, then the pilings must be
replaced/repaired within 60 days of permit requirement
notification.
2. Sub -tenant shall conduct business operations approved
within the lease agreement on Lease Sites 129W-133W
only during the terms of this sub -lease.
RESOLUTION NO. 21-88
RESOLUTION DECLARING WEEDS A NUISANCE AND FIRE HAZARD
AND AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENI
TO PROCEED WITH ABATEMENT
T H E C I T Y C❑ U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Morro
Bay does hereby act in accordance with Chapter 8.12 of the Morro
Bay Municipal Code by declaring weeds a public nuisance and fire
hazard, and hereby authorizes the Public Works Department to
take the necessary steps to implement this year's Weed Abatement
Program; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all parcels cut will be abated to
all adjoining property lines and to the street paving or curb,
that such abatement shall not be achieved through discing,
tilling, or any form of soil excavation; and that all cut and
destroyed vegetation shall be properly cleared and disposed of
within twenty-four hours of the cutting; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a public hearing shall be held by
the City Council of the City of Morro Bay on May 9, 1988 at 6:00
p.m. in the Morro Bay Veterans Hall to hear comments From
individuals who received notice to abate their parcels.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Morro
Bay at a regular meeting thereof held the 28th day of March,
1988, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
DALE REDDELL, Mayor
ATTEST:
- I I �/C --
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 20-88
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A REVISED GRANT DEED FOR
PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT EL MORRO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 30-87
authorizing the purchase of real property located at E1 Morro
Elementary School and authorizing the City Administrator to
execute the grant deed to said property on behalf of the City of
Morro Bay; and
WHEREAS, said grant deed was recorded at the office of the
San Luis Obispo County Recorder on March 31, 1987 as Document No.
21418, Official Records, San Luis Obispo County; and
WHEREAS, there is a discrepancy in the legal description of
said deed; and
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay wishes to record a revised
grant deed with the correct legal description and exhibit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay to hereby accept the revised grant deed from the
San Luis Coastal Unified School District for the subject property
located at E1 Morro Elementary School.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Administrator is
authorized to accept the deed to said property on behalf of the
City of Morro Bay and cause the recording of said documents.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Morro
Bay at a regular meeting held thereof on the 28th day of
March 1988 by the following vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
DALE REDDELL, Mayor
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
AND WMaN 119COIIDED MAIL
TO
r
N._
C." A
M.N
.."As I'll .N Ia
r
MIr
a—
W..0
C., I
.-
I
CAT. NO. NNO0578
TO 1901 CA 12-801
ii.
J I SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S VSE
Corporation Grant Deed
s.,a IOMM IU".1j.xO aV TIcOR TITLe IMSUYana
The undersigned grantor(.) declare(.):
Documentary transfer tax is I
( ) computed on full value of property conveyed, or
( ) computed on full value lean value of liens and encumbrances remaining at time of Dole.
( ) Unincorporated area: ( ) City of , and
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
IRV NIKOLAI, SUPERINTENDENT OF THE SAN LUIS COASTAL UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT, FORMERLY MORRO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,
a corporation organized under the laws of the State of California hereby GRANTS to
THE CITY OF MORRO BAY, A Municipal Corporation
the following described real property in the City of Morro Bay
County of San Luis Obispo , State of California:
See Exhibit A and B attached and made a part hereof.
In Witness whereof, said corporation has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed hereto and this instru
men[ to be executed by it
,H t5ana--------------------- - ere cry
thereunto duly authorized.
Dated March 15, 1988
SAN.L�InS COASTAL UNIFIED SCHOOL DI
STATE. OI' CALIPORNIA
COUNI'V OF SAN LUIS OBISPO SS.
B)'
President
On March 15, 1988, , before me, the
B f
y
undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally
NI Secretary
appeared Iry Nikolai
personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satis-
factory evidence to be the person who executed the within
instrument as chc---------- --------- PttsdrsrYza$
_^__________________________malty^yrrrow-rzo
mrvr povedZD-mrDDThrtra:isv =is' itnyeridence ,I bent.
fM,,.IN4w:w,ra/CUNQibOW KSKaRaiFIDbAL3Fth.
Secretary of the Corporation that executed the within ins tr omensOra1LIµ
and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the
6Er.L
KIN HOLNES
within instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of i¢
MOr.pr wftic ALUOR.IA
1*1W..__E_YP.
board of directors.
M LUIS(BISPO fcum
WITNESS mry/h)and and�offffic�ial seal.
APR. 29, 1991
%
Signature A•lt L�✓w_."KiL-CiYNiiY
, el
oral.., m. .
KIM HOLMES, Notary Public
Title Order No. Escrow or Ixlan
MAa TAY STATFAIFNTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE
•
EXHIBIT A
The purpose of this document is to correct an error in the
description in deed recorded in Vol. 2971 of Official Records
at Page 51.
All that portion of Lot 10 of the Subdivision of Rancho San
Bernardo in the County of San Luis Obispo, State of
California, as shown on map of said subdivision of a part of
the Rancho San Bernardo, filed for record January 5, 1907 in
Book 1 of Maps at Page 6 of said County, described as follows:
Commencing at the intersection of the Southwesterly line of
said Lot 10 with the Easterly line of Dunes Street (formerly
"D" Street) as shown on map of Tract No. 2 recorded in Book 5
of Maps at Page 20, records of said County, Said intersection
point being the Northwest corner of Lot 5, Block 51 of said
Tract No. 2; thence along the South line of Lot 10, said line
also being the North line of aforementioned Lot 5 in Block 51,
South 62033' East, 21.91 feet to a point being the Southeast
corner of that tract of land conveyed by Rufugia Herrera to
the Morro Union School District by deed recorded in Vol. 197
of Official Records at Page 120, records of said county, on
June 20, 1936; thence South 620 33' East a distance of 384.00
feet along the Southerly line of Lot 10 to the TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING, said point being the Southwesterly corner of that
certain tract of land conveyed by the Board of Trustees of the
Morro Union School District to the City of Morro Bay by deed
recorded April 28, 1965, in Vol. 1348 of Official Records at
Page 82, records of said County; thence North 270 27' East,
450 feet to a point on the northerly line of said tract of
land described in Book 428 of Official Records at Page 213;
thence along said northerly line North 620 33' West 65.00 feet
to a point; thence South 270 27' West 450.00 feet to a point
on the southerly line of said tract of land; thence along said
southerly line South 620 33' East 65.00 feet to the TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING, as shown on Exhibit B attached.
Qr N z7 27� E 450.00'
� � 1
Q MORQQ >3QY }
G jn Ncr�L PQOPERTY
'L �• Q 4•ZS o.R. Z13
1V4•I.p PROPERTY -DESCRIBED
3i
IN EXHIB,r A
l N Z7' Z7 ' E 450.
TpOB MoKrto e>^y comm. G-rR.
/ p LrT
` Q 1543 o.R. 8Z (1, �) G -t>) 8
1 >z=1GC>.cx:�* I 11V0ZfE sT&ke # 1
L= 03' 67 �.
1Z55 o.R. 34o In
KENNE-DY WAY °
1.1 27' 27' E 450.00'
595 O.R. 4.39 (1951)
SC/_�LE I"= lad
AM ENGINE---.91NG
Arm F7EJELOPMEN?
ASSOCIATES E X H 18, r B
32l NiPOrrO SiR ;iO SAN ; :S 09iSP0 G 93:r,:_ 9.y--a
5 5.5.. a:,
RESOLUTION NO. 19-88
ACCEPTING DONATION OF UP TO $50,000 FROM
MR. WALTER AXELSON FOR PAVING OF KERN AVENUE
THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, Kern Avenue has been designated by the City Council
for maintenance overlay in calendar year 1988, and
WHEREAS, Mr. Walter Axelson wishes to donate up to $50,000 to
the City of Morro Bay for the paving of Kern Avenue in memory of
his recently departed wife.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay to accept the donation from Mr. Walter Axelson
of up to $50,000 for the purpose of providing a maintenance
overlay of Kern Avenue.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council expresses its
deep appreciation to Mr. Axelson for this donation.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Morro
Bay at a regular meeting held thereof on the 28th day of
March 1988 by the following vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
DALE REDDELL, Mayor
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 18-88
A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE INTERIOR
DESIGN AND PURCHASING SERVICES CONTRACT
FOR THE MORRO BAY COMMUNITY CENTER
TO INTERIOR PLANNING RESOURCE
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City is in need of a community center to
serve the needs of the entire community, young and old
alike; and,
WHEREAS, the City requires an interior design firm to
assist in interior and finish selections who has extensive
experience in civic building design; and,
WHEREAS, after careful review of interested parties
submitting proposals, Interior Planning Resource of San Luis
Obispo was selected as most capable of offering design
services to the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Morro Bay that the contract for interior design
and purchasing services is awarded to Interior Planning
Resource.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Administrator is
authorized to sign the contract between the City and
Interior Planning Resource.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Morro Bay at a regular meeting held on this 14th day of
March 1988 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
DALE REDDELL
MAYOR
ATTEST:
ARDITH DAVIS
CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 17-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MORRO BAY, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND
APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW
ADDITIONAL USES IN DEL MAR PARK
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
CASE NOS. CUP 30-87/CDP 80-87R
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Morro Bay,
California, did on the 21st day of September, 1987 after a duly
noticed PUBLIC HEARING, did approve a Conditional Use Permit and
Coastal Development Permit to allow group picnic quarters at Del
Mar Park. The picnic facilities included the construction of
concrete slabs for installation of picnic tables, grills, trash
containers, construction of a picnic shelter, and installation of
an irrigation system for new landscaping. The subject property
is located in the OA-2/PD zone, more particularly described as:
APN: 65-149-17
Portion of Lot 29
Rancho Morro Y Cayucos Tract
City of Morro Bay
County of San Luis Obispo
State of California
WHEREAS, on October 1, 1988, William and Sharon Thomas did
appeal this action to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Morro Bay did on
November 9, 1987, hold a duly noticed public hearing on said
appeal; and
WHEREAS, after receiving public comments, the City Council
of the City of Morro Bay directed the Recreation and Parks
Commission to: 1) evaluate alternate locations for the group
picnic area; 2) review alternative sites for the existing BMX and
radio -controlled car uses; and 3) amend the grant that was to
provide financial assistance to construct the picnic facilities;
and
l •City Council Resol9ion No. 17-88
Page Two
WHEREAS, the Recreation and Parks Commission for the City of
Morro Bay met on January 19, 1988 to review City Council's
comments and did amend the Del Mar Park Master Plan accordingly.
Said Commission reduced the scale of the project and included a
recommendation to allow the retention of existing informal uses
(BMX and radio -controlled cars); and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Morro Bay did on
February 22, 1988 conduct a PUBLIC HEARING and conceptually
approved the amendments to the Del Mar Park Master Plan
recommended by the Recreation and Parks Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Morro Bay also
stated that said project has complied with the City of Morro Bay
objectives, criteria and procedures for implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), in that the project
has been found to be Categorically Exempt and no further
documentation is deemed necessary; and
WHEREAS, at said PUBLIC HEARING, after
report and the arguments of all persons,
testify, the City Council did find the
reasons to justify the granting of said
and Coastal Development Permit:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
considering the staff
if any, wishing to
following facts and
Conditional Use Permit
1. The use requested is properly one for the OA-2/PD zone, and
is consistent with the policies and objectives of the Morro
Bay General Plan and Coastal Land Plan; and
2. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the requested
use will not, under the circumstances of this particular
case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort
and general welfare of the persons residing or working in
the neighborhood of this proposed use; and
3. The use requested will not be injurious or detrimental to
property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general
welfare of the City.
COASTAL_ DEVELOPMENT_ PERMIT
1. The proposed project is consistent with the certified Local
Coastal Program and applicable provisions of the certified
implementing ordinances.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and
constitute the findings of the City Council on this matter;
'City Council Resolution No. 17-88
Page Three
2. That the City Council does hereby partially uphold the
appeal of William and Sharon Thomas amending the Del Mar
Park Master Plan and reducing the scale of the group picnic
facilities.
3. That the City Council does hereby grant approval of Case
Nos. CUP 30-87/CDP 80-87R, subject to the conditions
attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay on the 14th day of March, 1988, by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
DALE REDDELL, Mayor
ATTEST:
ARDITH DAVIS,
-----------------
City Clerk
i 6
RESOLUTION NO. 16-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MORRO BAY, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE PRELIMINARY
GENERAL PLAN FOR MORRO BAY STATE PARK
T H E C I T Y C 0 U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Morro Bay,
California, on the 14th day of March, 1988 held a duly noticed
PUBLIC HEARING to consider the Preliminary General Plan for Morro
Bay State Park; and
WHEREAS, Morro Bay State Park is located within the City of
Morro Bay, and the present and future uses of the State Park are
of vital interest to the City; and
WHEREAS, the City has a certified Local Coastal Program
which sets forth various planning objectives for Morro Bay State
Park, and provides for a coastal development permit process
regulating future development within the state park; and
WHEREAS, the City has actively participated with the staff
of the State Department of Parks and Recreation to assist their
understanding of the LCP and the City's concerns about
improvements within the park unit; and
WHEREAS, the staff of the State Department of Parks and
Recreation has been cooperative with the City throughout the
planning process, and has been sensitive to City concerns; and
WHEREAS, the city of Morro Bay finds the Preliminary General
Plan for Morro Bay State Park to be in compliance with the
general provision of the certified LCP Land Use Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay, as follows:
1. The City endorses the Preliminary General Plan for Morro Bay
State Park and recommends its adoption to the State Parks
Commission; and
2. The City Council of the City of Morro Bay commends the State
Parks staff for a quality planning program and general
responsiveness to the City's concerns.
Resolution No. 164
Page Two
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay, on the 14th day of March, 1988, by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ALE REDDELL, Mayor
ATTEST:
---——------------
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
6
RESOLUTION NO. 15-88
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR SAFE DRINKING
WATER BOND LOAN FOR WATER TREATMENT PLANT
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the State of California Department of Health
Services has money available to lend under the Safe Drinking
Water Bond Law of 1986 for a water treatment plant; and
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay will need a water
treatment plant for surface water projects as required by
the State Department of Health Services; and
WHEREAS, the maximum loan available for this project is
$5 million dollars at 3.3% interest for 20 years; and
WHEREAS, filing of the application requires
authorization of the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Morro Bay that pursuant and subject to all of
the terms and provisions of the California Safe Drinking
Water Bond Law Act of 1986 and all amendments thereto,
application by this City be made to the State of California
Department of Water Resources for funding to bring the water
supply system up to minimum safe drinking water standards.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Administrator of
said City is hereby authorized and directed to cause the
necessary data to be prepared and investigations to be made
in the name of said City to sign and file such application
with the said Department of Water Resources.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Morro Bay at a regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day
of March, 1988, by the following vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
/ RE
REDD LL, Mayor
ATTEST:
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 14-88
AUTHORIZING FILING OF AN APPLICATION WITH THE STATE WATER
RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD TO APPROPRIATE WATER FROM THE
UNDERFLOW OF CHORRO CREEK (DOMENGHINI FLAT)
THE CITY COUNCIL
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the Morro Bay Area Water Management Plan (State
Department of Water Resources, September, 1982) indicates the City
of Morro Bay has an immediate need to develop additional ground
water resources for its municipal water supply; and
WHEREAS, there is an existing agricultural irrigation use of
water on the subject land; and
WHEREAS, previous evaluations of this property indicate there
is a potential for developing a municipal water supply utilizing
the water now used for irrigation on this property; and
WHEREAS, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) has
determined that utilization of said water for municipal water
supply will require the award of an appropriative permit by that
Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay authorizes the filing of an application with
SWRCB for a permit to appropriate water from the riparian
underflow of Chorro Creek on the property known as Domenghini
Flat;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Public Works is
authorized to execute the application and other documents related
to this application on behalf of the City of Morro Bay.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Morro
Bay at a regular meeting held thereof on the 14 day of
March, 1988 by the following vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
DALE REDDELL, Mayor
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
SjJE WATER RESOURCES CONT� BOARD
I'..•N DIVISION OF WATER RIGH
APPLICATION MAP
® Proposed Wells (points of diversion
Proposed Pipeline
—• Corporate Boundary (point of use)
Iwo 1® 1® yM .Oy ym ww qy qp
' 1 'A 1 • 1 ..M{III
CONTOUR INTERVAL +0 rEET
25
11
E
NO. 12-88
RESOLUTION APPROVING NEW 29 YEAR 9 MONTH LEASE AND
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FOR LEASE SITES 62-62W
WITH DR. ROBERT E. AND MRS. MARILYN HITTLE
THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MORRO BAY, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay has instigated
litigation against Dr. and Mrs. Hittle claiming that the
Hittles had breached the previous lease between the City of
Morro Bay and Dr. and Mrs. Hittle; and
WHEREAS, the Hittles have disputed the City's claims
and raised certain defenses which defenses, which defenses
are disputed by the Hittles; and
WHEREAS, the parties have negotiated a settlement of
that legal action pursuant to direction from the City
Council in accordance with the terms and conditions of the
Settlement Agreement attached hereto and made a part hereof
by reference; and
WHEREAS, as a part of that settlement agreement the
parties agreed to rescind the old lease and to execute a new
lease between the parties, which new lease is attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to settle the
litigation in accordance with the terms so set forth and it
is also in the public interest to enter into a new lease
pursuant to that settlement agreement; and
WHEREAS, Dr. and Mrs. Hittle have already signed both
the settlement agreement and the new lease thereby agreeing
to all the terms and conditions contained therein,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Morro Bay that the Settlement Agreement and new
lease for lease sites 62 and 62W between the City of Morro
Bay and Dr. and Mrs. Hittle entered into pursuant to said
settlement agreement is hereby approved and the CITY
RESOLUTION NO. 12-88
Page Two
ADMINISTRATOR and CITY ATTORNEY are hereby authorized and
directed to sign said Settlement Agreement, and the MAYOR
and CITY CLERK are hereby authorized and directed to sign
said Lease.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Morro Bay at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd
day of February, 1988, by the following vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: -None
DALE REDDELL, Mayor
ATTEST:
O
AkbITH DAVIS, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 11-88
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A WATER ALLOCATION PROGRAM
FOR 1988 AND SETTING FORTH THE ANNUAL 1988 PROGRAM
AND OPERATING GUIDELINES FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL,
NEW COMMERCIAL, AND NEW INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, Chapter 13.20 of the Morro Bay Municipal Code calls
for the City Council to adopt a yearly Water Allocation Program
based on a report by the Community Development Director after re-
view by the Planning Commission; and,
WHEREAS, Measure "F" adopted by the voters in 1984 requires
the City Council to set an annual limit on new residential units
and to prescribe the mix of multi -family and single family resi-
dences allowed within that limit, after review and recommendation
by the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, on December 7, 1987, the Planning Commission did re-
view the Director's report on the proposed 1988 Water Allocation
Program and on suggested limits for 1988 under Measure "F", and did
forward recommendations on the same to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on February 8, 1988, and again on February 11, 1988
during a special meeting, the Council did hold PUBLIC HEARINGS on
the proposed 1988 Water Allocation Program and Operating Proce-
dures, and suggested limits for 1988 under Measure "F".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, as follows:
1. That the City Council hereby receives and accepts the Annual
Water Allocation and Operating Procedures Report submitted by
the Community Development Department; and
2. That a Water Allocation Program for 1988 is hereby adopted by
the City Council in accordance with the report as presented by
the Community Development Director and specifically adopting
the recommendations and annual water report including modifi-
cations to the operating procedures, which are incorporated
herein by this reference, subject to the following modifica-
tions or clarifications:
a) That compliance to Measure "F" be achieved by limiting
new development in 1988 to 77 residential housing units;
50 to be single family residential and 27 to be multi-
family; and
b) That the City allocate to Peoples' Self Help Housing Cor-
poration (PSHHC) 20 housing units from the available
housing pool in 1988 and an additional 20 housing units
from the 1989 residential distribution program, recogniz-
ing that occupancy of the project is not intended to oc-
cur until 1988. The City also awards in 1988 to PSHHC 15
water equivalencies for the 40-unit project; and
Resolution No. 11-� •
Page 2
c) That the City provide priority water allocations for the
10 residential applications that in 1987 had submitted
applications prior to March 10, 1987, but did not receive
a water allocation because the 1987 award was exhausted.
These said applications shall also not be subject to any
lottery program in 1988. The remaining 5 applications
that were on the original list of 15 will be given a pe-
riod of 3 weeks from February 23, 1988, to submit com-
pleted applications; and, if such applications are found
to be complete, they will automatically be in the lot-
tery; and
d) That the City retain the same off -site retrofit formulas
as used in the 1987 off -site retrofit program, with no
changes; and
e) That the staff present for adoption an appropriate ordi-
nance requiring mandatory retrofit upon the sale of prop-
erties located within the City limits. Furthermore, the
City shall not participate in the costs of performing any
mandatory retrofit. Said costs shall be a part of escrow
or other agreement between a buyer and seller; and
f) That the City adopts the "blend program" for water allo-
cation where each project proponent first obtains one-
half of a water award through the off -site retrofit pro-
gram. Upon acceptance by the Chief Building Official
that an off -site retrofit application has been completed,
the other one-half of the water award would then be allo-
cated through the Water Recovery Program (pipe line re-
placement). A project proponent at his/her discretion
may also obtain a full water award by utilizing the off -
site retrofit program; and
g) That applications for new residential development shall
be accepted one day only on Tuesday, February 23, 1988
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. and from
1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.; and
h) That the City adopts a quarterly award system with the
dates of the awards set on:
April 4
June 6
September 5
December 5
If less than 35 completed single family residential ap-
plications are received, all applications will be placed
into respective quarters based on a first come, first
serve basis.
If more than 35 completed single family residential ap-
plications are received, a lottery will be held and the
quarterly awards will be made in the numerical order the
applications are drawn from said lottery; and
Resolution No. 11-�
Page 3
i) That the City adopts operating procedures that in the
event more than 40 single family residential applications
(including the 5 eligible for automatic placement in
the lottery pursuant to (c) hereinabove) are received a
lottery will be held. Furthermore, a single family lot
owner may submit only one application; unless, less than
40 single lot owner applications are received, whereupon
a project proponent may submit additional single family
residential applications to a total of three. Upon sub-
mission of applications within the time period specified
by Council, the Community Development Department will
check each application for completeness. If more than 40
single family residential applications are received, the
Director will set a date and time to conduct a lottery
for all completed applications; and
j) If more than 40 completed single family residential ap-
plications are received and a lottery is held, the re-
maining applications not among the first 40 drawn will
also be drawn; these remaining applications will then be
placed on a waiting list for a building permit in the or-
der drawn in the event one or more of the first 40 appli-
cations does not perform or obtain a building permit in a
timely manner and in accordance with Chapter 13.20 of the
Morro Bay Municipal Code. Applicants placed on the wait-
ing list and not obtaining building permits in 1988 will
remain on the waiting list with absolutely no guarantees
that water will be available in 1989 or that their re-
spective applications will be given any priority status;
and
k) That the City adopts operating procedures to process
multi -family residential requests in the same manner as
single family residential requests, if submitted projects
exceed the seven (7) multi -family housing units available
in 1988.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay, at a regular meeting held on this 22nd day of
February, 1988, by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Lemons, Odell, Sheetz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Donnelly, Reddell
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
MEMORANDUM Dc e _M 91 f,:i;z'1
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: January 11, 1988
TO: Honorable Mayor
SUBJECT: Annual Report on
and City Council
Water Allocation Program
On November 30, 1987, the Annual Water Report was released to the
City Council, who, in turn, forwarded the document to the Planning
Commission and Water Advisory Board (WAB) for their
recommendations.
The Planning Commission reviewed the report on December 7th.
Copies of the Commission's minutes and resolution are attached (see
Exhibits "A" and "B"). In summary, the Commission accepted the
report of the Director but recommended several modifications to the
operating procedures. These modifications are listed in the
Commission's resolution and consist of reducing the number of
residences required to be retrofitted from 22 to 15. Other
Commission recommendations include that the City actively
Participate in marketing the retrofit program, and encourage the
use of 1-1/2 gallon flush toilets in retrofit proposals and in new
construction. The Commission further stated that the water
recovery program should continue and be used to enhance fire flows
and replace deteriorated water lines. Excepting for a special
award for Peoples' Self Help Housing Corporation, the Commission
recommended that no additional water awards be. made through the
recovery program.
The WAB reviewed the water report.on December 9th. Copies of the
WAB's minutes are not yet available. The WAB agreed with the staff
recommendations except that to require 22 residences to be
retrofitted for every new residence was excessive. The WAB
recommended that until additional data over a longer period is
available, that the current retrofit ratio be maintained. The WAB
suggested that the following comments by individual members also be
forwarded to the Council.
WAB member Fisher expressed a desire for the Citv to allocate more
water through the water recovery program. He expressed concerns
with the operating procedures, particularly in regards for the
method of allocation to low and moderate income housing projects.
Mr. Fisher discussed further a mechanism to bring water recovery
and off —site retrofit into a more simplified package.
Memorandum —
Annual Water
Page Two
January 11, 1988
Report
WAB member Cartwright was hesitant to accept the quarterly award
system discussed in the draft. operating procedures and opposed
changing the retrofit ratio until more time has passed to gather
more comprehensive data.
WAB members Kitzman, Persons, and Wuriu stated that the mechanics
of the operating procedures were confusing due partially because
the water recovery program, Measure "F", and off —site retrofit
program all evolved separately.
The City Council should review these comments in relation to the
annual water report and the Director's recommendations. Comments
from the public have also been received during recent weeks about
operating procedures. As a result, staff has enclosed an addendum
which clarifies several procedural issues. The addendum is
attached to this report and is labeled Exhibit "C". The Council is
requested to consider these modifications in their review.
A copy of the Annual Water Report is attached for your convenience.
Attach-r eats
1. Planning Co:rmission minutes (Bxhibit "A")
2. Planning Comn ssion resolution (Fxhibit "B")
3. Addendum to operating procedures (Exhibit "C")
4. Annual water Report with supplemental appendices
MISUTES - PLANNING • 1". •
DECEMBER 7, 1967
PAGE 3 c�Y.1�T_T
decision to make a minor change to the project ma};ing 1t
necessary to continue the request.
Tice -Chairman Jack Harper opened the public heari
Chuck Murdy, 2410 Reno Court, asked for the efinition of a
security quarters.
Staff replied that a security quarter is a small apartment
located on a second story or at the re _ of the property' and is
allowed on a commercial site in specif'c commercial zones.
Imogene Haidet, 2861 Juniper asked if the security quarters
would be for the temporary us during construction or if it
remained after construction d finished.
Staff replied tha the apartment was allowed as permanent
living quarters.
Vice-Chairm Jack Harper closed the public hearing.
MINUTE MOTIO : Commissioner Richardson moved to continue Case No.
CUP 33-87/CDP 88-67R to the December 21st
Commission meeting. Commissioner Melvin seconded
the motion.
C. 1987 ANNUAL RATER REPORT. This reoort summarizes 1987's
water allocation awares and procedures, and 'compliance with
Measure "P". The report reviews the water recovery and off -
site retrofit programs and makes recommendations on water
awards and operating procedures =or next year's ailoCations.
Staff reviewed the three basic topics of the report;
Cistribution of water, the status df the retrofit and pipeline
programs, and the suggested recommendations.
Commissioner Melvin asked how effective the 1.5 gallon `_lush
toilets have been, and if staff had made inquiries into other
districts which had reouired them.
Staff replied that there had been a reluctance in installing
this type cf _ixture as the .5 gallon flush tcilet had been more
readily accepted by t'r.e public. Sta== sa led rust the Goleta
Water District had been contacted fcr _-format'_on about these
fixtures as they had been in use there for some time. The
general conclusion was that the newer __,.lures have been improved
but there still were some problems with the design and acceptance
on the part of the public.
PLANXISG
l.rS.V^
D�C�':E�R ' . 1987
PAGE 4
Exhibit "A" cont.
Commissioner Richardson asked in reference to option number
reserves.
two on page 12 if it were legal to allocate water from future
Staff replied that although no formal legal opinion had been
obtained from the City Attorney this method of allocation was the
only wav possible to allow for this many units under the multi-
family allotment under the existing ordinances. Staff added that
the units would not be given final occupancy until 1989.
Commissioner Melvin asked if there would be a problem with
the funding under HUD if the allocation were not made.
Staff replied yes.
Vice-Cheirman Jack Harper asked if the pipeline replacement
allocation was not provided would the replacement of pipe
continue.
Staff replied that the funds would be continued to the
project.
Commissioner Melvin asked in reference to the operating
procedures for obtaining application for new development if staff
would be publishing the requirements for submittal as well as
developing a handout for the public.
Staff replied that this is the intention and would be
proposing to Council that a two '
we
be given staff after the allocationohasubeenemadeepa anon period
Commissioner Richardson asked if
an applicant were to drop
Off Of the list would the applicants then all move up one number.
eta-` replied that the
Irecommendation is to maintain the
`s` nor a two year period. As applicants apply for new
development they will be placed on the list in chronological
order. If their application does not meet the specified criteria
Pt the time Of application, it will not be accepted, cut returned
wit^ instruct" On Of what i5 lacking.?^
_ an applicant
withdraws
their application the list will move forward to fill the space.
Vice -Chairman Jack Herper asked
would take af= -- the first quarteriv award
ee January ist as the Council would not be hearing
the repert by then.
Staff replied that Council will se
system but, - the cuarterly award
treat it probably wouldn't begin until after January.
Vice -Chairman Jack Harper opened d the public rearing.
Mark Dees, a local contractor, stated that the
appli Cants N'r.i C. were ^c + -I-teen
not able to build last year and who were
recommended -Co head the 196
7 li_t should be v '
g•. en a specific
.':iN'Tc:S - PL4NNINCO
LECE uER 71 1987 •
PAGE 5
Exhibit "A" Cont.
amount of time in which they must appl}' so that the remaining
applicants could begin the process. .He also asked how many
multi -family units would remain after the PSHH award.
Staff replied if the recommendation was approved that seven
(7) multi -family units would be available.
Mark Dees expressed his concern with the quarterly award
system. He stated that if all 70 applicants made application at
the same time and were given the same 120 days to complete the
process the department would be faced with the same backlog of
work. He asked if it would be possible to apply for the
discretionary permits; use permit, variance, etc., prior to the
acceptance of the building application.
Staff replied that they did not anticipate a great need for
discretionary permits which'would require public hearings, that
most could be handled administratively therefore it was not
recommended to begin discretionary permit processes prior to the
acceptance of the building permit application.
Richard Harvey, a local plumbing contractor, stated that the
requirement for 22 retrofits per new SFR seemed excessive. He
hoped there was a way to minimize the number. He suggested
utilizing the 1.5 gallon fixture.
Craig Melt-ner, People's Self -Help Housing Director, spoke
about the allocation process for the 40 unit senior housing
project. He stated that HUD had to be given assurance that water
would be allocated to the project prior to granting funds. He
agreed with the construction time table far the project and
assured the Commission that 'final occupancy was planned for logo.
'andv Ruff, 485 Shasta, stated that the -;!nual Report did
not deal with tno current water levels in the C'it\' N'e115 and the
amount which is allowed O}' the State Water Resources Board. He
Stated that we are using 974 O`_ that allocation and could not see
the justification of continued "allocation with the use at this
level. Mr. Ruff added tnet a better analysis was need before the
report was Sent to Council
Bruce Morgan, 29-5 Elm Stre
to et, stated that he had attempted
OL•iid under the 1pipeline _erlaCeme:a award and understood
that he would be Onee Of the 15 who would be allowed a
a1lOcation but under the - - - 'i'st
.etrofi, prograr,.. He did not believe
this to be _fair treatment adding that he and the - fteen other
applicants should be allowed pipeline replacement water which is
being allocated to the Multi -unit housing project.
Staff re5 onded M . p tO Piorgcn's comments stating that under
current ordinances for Pipeline
residential pipe - replacement multi -family
u'*].t5. L'li�5 have a higher priority than single ;arr..iiy
L'.^.ite 1 St affua150 provided the aPp.0.%_imate number of available
left in :1C_^rG teay w'ni C}1 could
be rEtrCfi��ed.
MINUTES — PLANNING COISSI01; •
DECEMBER 7, 1987
PAGE 6
Exhibit "A" cont.
Commissioner Melvin asked if staff had done any evaluation
of how many families are Killing to take advantage of the
program. He added that the City needs to advertise the program
to eliminate all of the misconceptions and to make it easier on
the applicants to obtain agreements.
Staff agreed that the City has not promoted the program in
the past.
' Ernie Miller, 645 Morro Avenue, stated that 22 retrofits
would be an excessive number to complete. He added that under
the present formulas a two bath home earns the most for the money
spent retrofitting. Each additional bathroom is given less
credit but the same amount of money is required to retrofit it.
He also asked if the unused commercial equivalencies could be
given to residential uses.
Staff explained how the retrofit formula was arrived at, and
added that water equivalencies could not be exchanged between
commercial and residential under existing ordinances.
Kathy Alchurad a, 810 Luisita, stated that she and her
husband have been waiting to build on their lot so that they
could begin their family. She was concerned that the amount of
retrofits required would make the cost prohibitive to young
couples such as them. She asked if the Citv could obtain the
retrofits and dole them out or if they could maintain a list of
homes which need retrofitting and would agree to the program.
Kathy,also asked if contractors and developers were given the
_.same opportunity for allocation as home/owner builders.
Staff, stated that the City=.ttorncv had prepared a legal
opinion On the pO55ibillt}' Of the City imposing a mandetory
retrofit program throughout the City. Staff also stated the- for
the City to take on the whole implementation of the retrofit
program they would need to hire extra staff and the program would
probabl}' not be as effective if operated by city govenment. Staff
added that there is no differen-ial treatment of allocation to
home/owner builders versus contractors.
Vice —Chairman Jack harper asked about the building
limitation ordinance which imposed a deed restriction limiting
the transfer of water within the first year of occupancy.
Staff replied that there had been legal CuestiC.^.s regarding
L1_ rest.—icticn which had been placed on pipeline water and it
had been removed. Staff added that there had not been such a
restriction on the retrofit allocation program.
Commissioner Melvin stated that the Cit}' needed to
investigate incentives for owner occupied residential
construction.
MINUTES — PLANNING C•IISSION •
DECEMBER 7, 1987
PAGE 7
Exhibit "A" Cont.
Randy Ruff stated that through his investigation of retrofit
allocations in 1987 approximately 254 of the applicants were
contractors.
Ron Kessling, a local contractor, stated that he hoped to
build this year for himself but that the number of necessary
retrofits seemed prohibitive. He asked if it weren't possible to
cut the number to a more reasonable amount or use the savings
from pipeline to offset the difference.
Staff replied that the Coastal Permit approved by the
California Coastal Commission required a savings of 2 to 1 and
that according to the analysis of the past years program this
savings was not being met, therefore, while staff was not so much
recommending 22 units be retrofitted for each new SFR permitted
it was a way of insuring the Coastal Permit specification. Staff
added that other options were being researched which may allow
for fewer retrofitted units per application.
\'ice —Chairman Jack Harper closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Melvin that this was a difficult issue and it
would be impossible to please everyone. He basically agreed with
staff's recommendations but had a major concern with the number
of retrofits required to meet the 2 to 1 ration. He stated that
the existing data base was small and therefore could not provide
an exact analysis. He was in favor of some type of balance
between the previous requirement of 11 and this years
recommendation of 22. Commissioner Melvin stressed the need for
the City to promote the retrofit program through advertising and
meil—outs. He added that he was in favor of the City Council
granting some type of relief for the 15 people who were unable to
build under the pipeline program last, year. Commissioner "ielvin
did agree with the recommended procedures of accepting
applications and finally, in regards to Mr. Ruff's comments, the
City Council should review and clarify the amount of water useage
by the city with the amount agreed to by the State Water
Resources Department.
Staff replied to the last statement by Commissioner Melvin
stating that the numbers in the report relate to the question and
it appears that we will be under the maximum acre feet allowed.
The city does use all the water which is allowed each year and
bus has not increased the usagE with the new development which
seems to indicate that efforts toward conservation are working.
Commissioner Richardson was concerned that if the Coastal
Permit, for the water allocation was now mEt t at the -Oa5I
tal
Commission may ask for verification of the pipeline replacement --
program and it is doubtful such proof is available. He agreed
-with the recommendations.made by staff and Commissioner Melvin.
Commissioner John Harper agreed wit^ staffs recommendations
he did not feel that pipeline was a viable program as it is
�::''L'TES - P • •.sS:orc
DECE.":BER 7. 1987
PAGE 8
Exhibit "A" coat.
inconclusive and agreed with Commissioner Nelvin that 22 units to
retrofit was too high a number.
Tice -Chairman Jack Harper agreed with the other
Commissioners.
Staff then outlined the recommendations made b_v the
Commission as follows:
- the number of units to retrofit is too high and some way of
reducing the number should be found; possibly by amending
the Coastal Permit
the city needs to tape an aggressive approach to promoting
the retrofit program
some type of relief should be granted the 15 people who
attempted to build under pipeline last year
- the procedural changes are adequate
- pipelines should continue to be replaced
The discussion continued on a few other points as follows:
How the city might utilize the savings from the 2 to 1
savings retrofit is supposed to save now. :_ the
equivalency was to be saved for future use, then use it now.
How the city might promote the use of the 1.5 gallon
fixture.
water now befcre the Coastal 'Comm-ssion
discontinues _ts use because of !a0}: of val
Mr. hessl':r_ger suggested the possibility of receiving Credit
for using the _.5 gallon __..lure in a new SrR as ?art of that
Ceveiopmenl's retrofit package. He added ti,at the PS*"' prcJec:
should be required to use 1.5 gallon=_..tures.
O rTai ad07110.^. C•f a re50',Uil0, der-': iIlg CASE ' i.l� �J—F.7
l =•00e , c^.. .."tc E arr.• Car.° _ — Erccde_^o).
he Commission, b ^."('Hite Notion ate: nan':mOuS) made the
decision to allow the aD^,_..ant to request :he case be
reopened for pubii^ .._cring to be recch_iderec for denial
without reiu' formal accotion of the resolution for
the "P .+`5 aC110.^. will lahE ^1aCE al tno December 2151
�- _..ins.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 73-87
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING A WATER ALLOCATION PROGRAM
FOR 1988 AND SETTING THE ANNUAL LIMITS ON 1988
NEW RESIDENTIAL, NEW COMMERCIAL, AND
NEW INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
KHEREAS, Chapter 13.20 of the Morro Bay Municipal Code calls
for the Planning Commission to recommend to the City Council a
yearly Water Allocation Program, based on a report by the
Communitv Development Director; and
WHEREAS, Measure "F" adopted by the voters in 1984 requires
the Citv to set an annual limit on new residential units and to
prescribe the mix of single family, multi -family residences
allowed within that limit,; and
WHEREAS, on December 7, 1967,. the Planning Commission did
review the Director's report on the proposed 1987 eater
.allocation Program and on suggested limits for 1987 under Pleasure
and
WHEREAS, on December 7, 1987, the Planning Commission did
hold a PUBLIC HEARING on the proposed 1988 Water Allocation
Program and suggested limits' --or 1986 under Measure "F".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, as follows:
1. That the Planning Commission hereby receives and accepts the
Annual .City Water Report as submitted b%. the Community
,)evelopment Department; and
2. fiat a hater Llloca ;on Program '_cr 1966 is h-rebv
recommended to the Council in accordance with the report of
the Community Development Director and. specifically adopting
?e reCOtmendatiCnS anq annUa! water repent including
modifications to the operating procedures, which are
inCCr70rated herein by i5 re_`erence, stDlect t0 the
ollowing recommended modifications Or Clarifications:
E. `educe the number of rEtrO.it for a single residence
2 i'to
n owe-
numoer
Such as 10. Tn- Commission believes twat increasing
the number of rEtrofi__ recu'i_ed in order t0 maintain the 2
t0 1 ratio the guidelines is prema-zure at this time given.
the limited ^Statistical data available. tu'rther, requiring
22 retrofits for each new home may be an impractical and
excess'. ely difficult requ`'_rement app_icants to meet and
could undermine use of t:7e retrcfi. _rogram;
r_1
.0
Planning Commission Resolution No. 73-87
page Two
Exhibit "B" cont.
b. Tl,e City should actively participate in marketing the
retrcfit program in order to maximize public acceptance and
participation;
C. The City should encourage the use of 1-1/2 Fallon
toilets in retrofit proposals and in new construction, and
should install these extra low flow• units in City Hall and
other suitable City properties in order to help save water
and demonstrate their effectiveness;
d. While the Commission supports for the present time the
emphasis on the retrofit program rather than making general
pipeline savings awards, the pipeline replacement project
should continue in order to save water, replace deteriorated
Mate: lines, and enhance fire flows through the waterline
system.
3. That compliance to Measure p be achieved by limiting new
development in 198E to new residential development for 1988
are recommended to be 77 total units, 50 to be single family
residences, and 27 to be multi —family units.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the Planning Commission of
the City of Morro Be% at a regular meeting thereof held this 21st
day of December, 1967, by the following roll call vote:
NOES ; NE e
!Vice Cna.rman
`-i
A TZST:
W 7llL4 M -� 71, Secretary
E
J`lIBI- .,c.,
ADDENDUM TO OPERATING PROCEDURES
1. 1988 Quarterly Award Schedule.
The public has expressed interest as to the anticipated dates for
accepting building permits and the dates of the quarterly awards.
The following list is a suggested schedule for accepting
applications and dates for awards:
January 11
Council approves report/sets quota
February 19-
Community Development Department
accepts
a
applications
March 7
Planning Commission makes first
quarterly award
June 6
Planning Commission makes second
quarterly award
September 5
Planning Commission makes third
quarterly award
December 5
Planning Commission makes fourth
quarterly award
2. Expiration Period for Applicants Who Submitted Applications Last
Year After Water Allocation Closed for 1987.
The proposed operating procedures recommend that those applicants
that had submitted a complete application but did not receive an
allocation because the 1967 list was cut-off and closed would be
given a preferred status to resubmit their applications and be
placed at the top of the list for 1988. The procedures, however,
do not specify any expiration dates for plan resubmittal. It is
recommended that these applicants be required to submit a
complete building permit, including Title 24 enemy calculations,
any seismic soils reports, if required by city ordinance, and a
complete retrofit package no later than 120 days from the date
the Council directs staff to begin accepting 1988 applications.
If such applications are not submitted within the time D_eriod
specified, any original position could not be retainer:.
3. Placement of Multi -Family, Commercial, and Industrial Projects on
the Water Waiting List. ,
The procedures outline the specific process for placement on the
water waiting list for single family projects. It does not
specify the procedures for multi -family, commercial, and
industrial projects; this needs to be clarified.
For multi -family projects requiring an administrative coastal
permit, tine operating
P g procedures for such requests would be the
same as for single family residence:,.
All Other multi -family requests, and commercial and Industrial
Projects, prior to establishing a Dlace on the 1988 water waiting
115t, mUst obtain all necessary local discretionary permits
needed by the development Dro-ect. _ter such permits are
obtained, applicants may submit building plans in the manner as
discussed in the annual water report.
AGEENDA NO.
Date ��� Action
STAFF REPORT
CO. "Ill ,U\ 17 T DEVEL0?'lz: 1 ilc-A31.- c 1
DATE: November 0, 19.07
,0: Honorable `;ayor, City Cou]]ci?
SUBJECT: Annual Reporz on Wafer .4. location :'rogram
I. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS
Each December, the Community Development Department prepares an
annual report on the past "ear's water allocations and recommends
a specific allocation plan for the upcoming year. The report is
to be reviewed by the Planr:ino Commission on December - and by
the Water Advisory Board (WAB) on December 9th. The Comm�ssioa]'s
comments and those of the WAB will be forwarded to ,he City
Council in January, 1988.
,here arc three basic topics this report shall address;
these are the distribution of water in i987the Stb" Cs. Of the
water recovery program and the of; -site retrcfi, program, and
suggested recommendations for Water allocation in 1968, including
chenges to the operating procedures. Each of ,hese topics is
discussed under separate headi]]l,s. Under each heading is a 1?st
of summarti' information. "lore d'_'taiied analysis 6GOCt EaCi] tOrliC
including charts and tables, is listed in the corresponding
appendices.
II. DISTRIBUTION OF WATER EQUI\'_LENCIES FOR 1987 (Apnendir. ,A,,
The Council allowed a maximum of only
1 30 water equivzlenc}" u]]its
to be distributed to new development during -he past year. These
units .of water were d's-__butec , - _
replacemen, pros- - as pa.- r..- he pip�._ne
Cf h= ota l ar::oc::. .
equivziencies v:e_ :ar e_ - .9
^l' av ^ ,O „-.<<DIe-.cjec,s r'crsua.-._ ,C.:?]e
a7proved water recover\•^ tc 1oCa,ion mc'de1. Cf t?]e amU n,
distributed, the n:zjOrity of the water award,E•9 percent wen,
CO Single family reside!]tia! Consti-uc,lcn. .'?e remci.'._:`g awar. s,
al DerCe^t, Were distributed am0::Smail €el]?rat commercial
office, and industrial prcjec,s.
Water allocation also occurred _..rough water
retrofit program for 1967. Xeariv all of the retrofit -og-ams
_ p- o'
earned water _C s "cle _ac:i:" Jrojec,s. he Council in en'
years has favored the -e--off` roc. - rec_
=.loom -. Dram over _I,e Wat.,_ recover
,1C1] mode]. nis fa\'O red^ S,atUS ic- a re Sl:l ^Cf the
U gram' S abil i,_" ,J mea SI-, a assumed ver S.,: aCtua'. scving5.
='reel OUS repor,s have suggested thct Wafer Sa'•"ino5 i5 OCCL'__:na,
a1L'10L`gh a, less t.nen e.:pec,ed level S.
In summary, botl].water ailOCation meth Ods a: 1 owed 54 cinclle
:anvil • n
residential l'nits, 16 multi-faral}' units, and minor
commercial er.d _., s,:;ai development. Bo,i] the amount and mi:;
?AGE 2
of single family and multi -family units
are
Within the prescribed
limits set
by Measure "F" for 1987.
In
addition Measure "F"
states that
not more than 57 percent of
the
equivalencies awarded
in a Fear
can go io commercial and
industrial
projects. For
1987, the
non-residential allocation
total
9.07 equivalencies,
re;iresenting
only 11 percent of the total
commercial/industrial
allocation.
I11. STATUS OF THE WATER RECOVERY (PIPELINE REPLACEMENT) PROGRAM
AID OFF SITE....RETROFIT_PROGRAMS
A. WATER RECOVERY (PIPELINE REPLACEMENT) PROGRAM (APPENDIX "D")
Since 1982, the City leas utilized a water allocation system known
as the water recovery program, or more sim;:)v pipe15ne
rep lacerent. Pipeline replacement ),as been considered to be a
method of ,cater conservation whereby the City raplaces old and
"leak.'" water mains with new water lines. Once the water has
been saved, the City traditionally distributed this water to new
development. The current model estimates that one water
equivalency is saved for every 165 linear feet of line replaced,
or 32 equivalencies per mile.
As a note to the reader one "water ecuivalency" eauais 10.780
cubic feet of water used per year, which has been determined to
be the average annual use by a single family residence in Morro
Bay. All water needs are expressed in terms of equivalencies.
As Of October 12 1957, the City cumu'atively has replaced 20.33
miles Of water line. Based on the formula mentioned above, the
City has "earned" about 584 water equivalencies. Of that amount,
340 equivalencies have been awarded. Therefore, the difference
between the two numbers, 244, represents the total number c_
ealii\'aienCleS availaDlE .Ur aa'arG. ..aStaI Perr',it Sc. 4-81-309,=,.
:however. wi it on v Dermit 120 c'f .',eSe erL i'ai enCieS t0 De
awarded "annually. The- remainder COuld De a st ri but ed in flit L're
allocation programs.
Pipeline replaceme— has Occurred at a=a`_rly active Dace. Si:]Ce
fiscal Year 1-8i-EJ an eve^age of 2.7 miles of new waver ma'::'1 has
[le eri instal led. =.t ttlis current pace, all 2E miles of main
should be replaced by 1990.
One of the continuing controversies raised about Di Del ine
replacement is ti]e amount Of water Savings resulting _r- t7]E
prO�ram. -ast ':ear wl]en re\'iewinc the 19E water a1,Ocation
prO,�ranl the A. =,D, _Tanning Commissi C:], and City Council expressed
some doubts a-ou't tl]E Drogram's e=_T1Clenc\'. TTi'_S OUL'Dt V:aS
=enerated 1--Y tl',e inabi]it v to provide empirical measurements on
^vreCl Se amount o: water savings. T- \'earn 15-Ae !'as-, Veal',
staff cannct provide a clear and de_'inite ansv:er as actual
water savings resulting :rom, the DrO;r&m.
WATER Ai OCA-_ AL ANNUAL REPORT
PAGE 3
Nonetheless, this is not to suggest that the program does not
work to some degree. Mathematically, the savings' formula (32
equivalencies saved for every mile of pipe replaced) appears to
make some reasonable assumptions about assumed sayings. Whether
the demand of new development has been exactly offset by savings
of replacing leaky pipes is not known".,_-*--- The fact remains that
water extraction has not exceeded historical levels deipite
strong pressures in terms of growth, the economy, and the effects
Of weather to increase demand. Countervailing effects of water
rates, voluntary conservation, replacement Of lenity pipes, and
the off -site retrofit program combined also make it very
difficult to measure sayings from the recovery model. The
relative impact of current growth rates and of savings by
retrofit and pipeline replacement are probably largely subsumed
and hidden by the impact of other and far more significant
variables such as the economy, weather and water. rates.
B. OFF_SITE RETROFIT_PROGRAM (APPENDIX _C",).
1. Background
In 1985 the City of Morro Bay initiated its "off -site retrofit
Program" whereby developers could earn water for new construction
by replacing older toilets and showerheads in existing buildings
with new water conserving fixtures. under the program, the
developer was required to save two gallons for every one gallon
his/her project needed. Therefore, if successful (and if the
savings estimates Proved accurate), then a net decrease in
overall water use should result.
Few developers took advantage of this option during 1985,
preferring to apply for water through the "pipeline replacement
program", which was the more simple and Stralgnt-forward method
of obtaining water. 5v the end of 198^ Only a few sma}7-stele
multi -family projects, which were unlike}. to u+ -o-
through the receive wa-__
g pipe replacement program because of jthe pricrity
system, had applied for water under the retrofit option.
in late 4C85 the City Coin]::il continued the _retrofit program t0
July 1986 oil an exper7 mental basis. At the same time, because
water line replacement work was Occurring slower than planned and
perhaps because of ambiguity" about the amount Of saved water, the
pipe replacement water allocations were discontinued after
Janllarv, 1986• Faced with no clear alternative, many Of the
applicants who had ..
��+ been Y:a.it_ng for water through the pipe
replacement program turned to the retrofit Option. `lost Of these were applicants for single family }': ou ses.
Two otner Significant changes occurred t0 the progrL'
am 6t t!S
ime. ti_S" tO encourage the retrGf It Gf homes rather -Ii as
C OmmerCial .^, L'ildings, the ratio of two a� , S- c
one a oc110._s saved =Or every
Qallon needed was applies; only to retrofit proposals under which at least %5 percent Of the estimated S60: as would be from
W;, TER i-0-. - 'r:EPOFT •
PAGE 4
upgrading the fixtures in existing homes. If less than 75
percent of the Hater in a retrofit proposal was to be saved by
retrofitting residences, then three gallons would need to be
saved for every one gallon needed. This helped spur a change in
the character of the retrofit proposals so that now most
retrofits are entirely residential, whereas many of the earliest
ones "ere almost entirely commercial
The second change was administrative. The staff revised their
savings estimates down, based on additional information from the
U.S. Department of housing and Urban Development. Thus,
typicall%, 11-12 existing residences needed to be retrofitted
before a single new house could be permitted.
As a result of these factors -- the discontinuation of pipe
replacement allocations, the emphasis on retrofitting residences
and the more conservative formulas -- the typical retrofit
application in 1986 was for the construction of a new single
famil3• house, involving the replacement of toilets, showerheads
and sink fixtures in 11 or 12 existing residences.
Next staff was directed to prepare a report analyzing the
program, for review by the Water Advisory Board, Planning
Commission and City Council by July 1986. The report concluded
that et the time few of t1,e retrofits had actually been
implemented and even fewer had been in long enough to obtain a
single meter reading. It was impossible to judge the water
savings of the at that program time; more data over a longer
period of time was needed.
Six months later, the 1986 Annual Water Report once again
reviewed the retrofit program. The review showed that retrofit
was saving water, but at less than expected levels. `inch o'_ the
data that was collected to draw this assumption v.-as st:21 limited
and more time was needed before any sound conclusions could Oe
made.
The 1987 Annual Water Report tries to determine the degree of
savings attri.bUtEd to the retrofit Dro�raTO. O d0 this, ti?i.5
report addresses the following issues:
Observed sayings should be compared to estimates Of sayings
to see if formulas need adjusting.
Estimated water savings compared to past usage including
some kind of control to extraneous variables (eg: a random
sample of non-retro_itted houses.
:he report will also discuss correlations between level 0-
savings and type of _:x: ure and the effectiveness of tCi'•et5
using less than 3. gailons/_flusi:.
WATER .._-OC.�T10' - ANNUAL REPORT
PAGE 5
2. Estimated Water Savings
The most important issue raised by 'lie program Jr whether or not
Water is actually being saved by retrofit, and, if so, how much.
In the early part of tl]is year staff began an analysis or:
Potential water savings resulting from retrofit. The first step
was to identify existing properties that had been retrofitted.
This information was collected and then correlated with
respective water account numbers. This information v:as then
entered into the City's utility file computer system which would
allow easy information access and data massaging. Next, all of
those accounts, which had been retrofitted for at least a one
year period, (those projects retrofitted in 1985 3 86) were
selected from the utility file system. Fifty of these account
numbers, chosen at random, then became the sampling pool. Of
this sample, six accounts were thrown out due to irregularities;
three of these accounts represented excessive water savings,
while the other three accounts represented increased consumption.
The sample data represents 37 single family residences, 30
apartments, and three commercial structures. Appendix C, Table
9, summarizes the sample. The sample was based on the previous
retrofit report's methodology which compared post -retrofit water
usage to previous year'., usage during an analogous time periods.
lu the analysis, an average of the past three years' usage during
the same meter reading period was used as the base line. The
test was to see if, after the retrofit, this years' use during
the same time period went up or down compared to the three year
average.
The analysis indicates that of the 44 meters in the sample, water
use in 26 of -he meters declined (590.). in the remainder of the
meters. water use increased.
Although the nalysis si]cws a reeuct'_on in water use, the nest
Question that `is raised is how muCh does It decline. Be --ore the
rex �r0f:t, three Vear average usage for the samp'e in an
analoe-ou's period was 67L 6 cubic feet. Az ter retrCf it, during
the same time period, the same sample used only 615,500 cubic
feet, for a sav_ngs of 59,267.cublc feet.
ow Co these. sav_ngs comDare \+-i-,. w:?at was predicted D\' theapproved formulas'. The approved formulas would expect that after
retrofit 116,615 cubic feet iS to be Saved from the sample. Tale
observed decrease, however, abOi;t 101 percent cf the amount that
was predicted. Tilts meals t']at cnly _.01 gallons are being saved
for each 1.0 gallon needed rather than a savings of 2.0 gallons.
-,he data GOeS sUggeSt ^.at for t_.ose residences retrof ted wit:]
conventicnai i'_XtLreS. Ater is ^'Ue'_.?g Saved but a; IeSS -'-at
expected levels. One cue=_tion.. that could be raised is that while
\Pater u'se i]as declined, ;; oP. Id i- Have dec11n ad for another reason
WATER=,_i0C4Tl��- ANNCAl- RRPORT •
PAGE 6
3. Control Sample
To answer this question, a random sample of 50 non -retrofitted
residences was obtained. Water records for these residences were
reviewed over the past two years. (As a note to the reader, it
was originally envisioned that the control sample would contain
data for a three year period. Only two years of data is easily
accessible from computerized records. Obtaining data for the
third year would require extensive Band tabulation and would have
delayed this report. Therefore, it was not included. next year,
however, since much of the groundwork for the sample control has
already been established and additional water records
computerized, a three year analysis will be possible.)
Table 12 summarizes the amount of water used over a two vear
period for the sample. The data suggests that the amount of
water used in the non -retrofitted sample group was generally
consistent from one year to the next. it should be noted that
there is a six percent increase in water use over the two vear
period. The significance of the increase is probably irrelevant
at this time given the limited time period of analysis. Staff
suggests that a change in weather over the two year period is
reflective of the water use increase. Summer weather patterns in
the first ycar of the sample were cooler than those found in the
second year.
One of the more interesting issues raised with this analysis is
that the amount of water being used in the residences is less
than the City's established water equivalency unit of 10,780
cubic feet. This unit of measurement is the basis for all new
construction water awards. if, in _`act, the water equivalency
unit is less than 10, 780 cubic feet, the City is actually
awarding more water to new development Char: _5 :eCnn_Cali:" being
used bi".that development. The impact of having an equivalency
unit less then 10,780 cubic feet could extend the use of pipeline
replacement awards. it also increases the percent savings
occurring through the retrofit program, since predicted savings
is based on One water equivalency equaling 10,780 cubic _feet.
-�t :.his point, it would appear to be too early to tell whether
the equivalency unit should be adjusted downward. More data
needs to be collected. Furthermore, the City may desire to take
a conservative stand and not make any changes to the equivalency
amount, his would mean that the City would continue to allocate
more water than new development uses.
4. Fixture Performance
The past two water reports tried to correlate between the level
Ci savings anal "ape Of =_:ture; and between :11e nL`mOer Cf
complaints and the type of fixture. Results of the correlation
showed mixed results :ith no clear answer regard::ig t:ie
efficiency of a particular product.
PPG E 7
In this report fixture performance is not analyzed for several
reasons. First, a great deal of hand tabulation was necessary
in Collecting tile data pool for tl,e randomly selected rC.rofi tc
sample. This act"'V;ty took an inordinate amount of time which
I iRlitc'd ant313'ses el F,(-where in this report. Second, the State c:
California already provides an approved product list for Kate:"
savil'ig fixtures. The City does use this list in approvin-
fixtures for retrofit projects. (tile City could use a niorc
restrictive list within that group of products a1loKed b\' ti7e
state. This, unfortunately, is an area where this report does
not provide information). Third, there are other factors beyond
fixture performance that affect .rater use. it is difficult to
measure these factors, and their impacts on .rater use in relation
to fixture per' ornance. Last I'v, during 1987, it appears that
most developers are generally installing higher quality fixtures
than in previous years, mainly because such fixtures provide for
better warranties.
It is possible to return mid -year with a more detailed analysis
of fixture Derformance how v e er, there is no guarantee o.-
definitive results. A better aDDroach would be for the City to
develop a list of fixtures used elsewhere by other communities
such as Goleta and Monterey County.
Installation of Low Flush Toilets
revious reports have attempted to measure the effectiveness of
toilets using less than 3.5 gallon./flush. So far, \'err few
projects have chosen this alternative proba'Plj' due to the expense
0_` such toilets. Therec <itl
,Iore, 1 e inzcrmfition exiStS t0
evaluate this t\-De of __?aure. pre\'1 011s reports !7a\'e a. SO
suggested installin.g the se fixt ure5 by developers in DUb1 is
dings• O Cate. till_:1 been done.
I1• . OPERATING ING PROCEDURES
A. BACKGROUND
Sec,ion 13.20.050 c_' tl?e ..ilicipal Code requires Ci- Counci
t0 maize an ailnua! eVieY; � -l7e operating Pr Oe``res 'r-
O_ C•D _cti...e U dll_ _,�_
administration of t1?e wa-er eGUiyalenCy program. The opera-ing
procedures (which deal ri.^a_ii witi7 the p_pel'_ne replacemen
Program) and the _relc wed re rofit guidelines establish :he S;eT_•s
t0 be fa!' —owed On E. dal2,basis t0 aCnli:?i Ster t11C •.:atE_'
:e Oe` atil':g Dr OOe CL' es and retrofit gui^e14'?es were aPP'oved
tnc C06stai Com'russ4_0n s- 1 ne-n er• -S1 -
--.. CO2 _ta. develoD..l _..t p__mit _-305 and
sU-Dsequent amendments. Fed' elements 0= these coastal `Dermltg are
t0 mail'lta i.. tGtal wa-,er -Usage D_, tile City 1':it:?in :. spe, i__e_
•�.=.TEn .i�_V.�, .=.ii�- .�:: l�Ln� n i'ORf •
PAGE 8
maximum amount and to ensure that the Coastal Act priorities for
allocation of Hater are adhered to. Substantive changes to the
operating procedures will require approval of the Coastal
Commission or its Executive Director.
Since their initial adoption, there have been few changes to the
operating procedures or retrofit guidelines. For 1987 l?owever,
Council did authorize the Planning Commission to make a blanket
approval of the water equivalency program in order that staff
could then make individual allocations administratively rather
than requesting the Planning Commission to approve each one.
B. ALLOCATION EXPERIENCE DURING THE 1987 WATER YEAR
Several procedures followed in 1987 resulted in misunderstandings
with applicants and an uneven work load for the staff. One such
problem area arose for some persons on a pre—existing pipeline
water waiting list that were unable to access pipeline water due
to the limited allocation for the year. These applicants were
required to compete for a position on the retrofit list with all
other retrofit applicants. Since staff required that a complete
application must include the retrofit package, several persons on
the pipeline list were not prepared, and did not successfully
obtain a retrofit allocation in 1987. This situation caused some
::^ard feelings and has pointed to the need for the Cite to make it
clear what the application requirements are well in advance of
the annual water award.
Confusion for applicants and staff has also resulted from
somewhat different procedures for processing applications for
pipeline versus retrofit water. This situation has resulted
Decause the two methods of water conservation were developed at
different times and the procedures for administering them were
not ful:y integrated.
'.notl?er Droblem area was the unmanageable work load for staff,
PaztiCularl\- the Building Inspectors that resulted from 'lie full
year's GUOta of residential applications being submitted within
the ___^St rew weeks Of Cou'ncil's annual allocaticn. During
initial period when lndividuels were racing to get their
o i.pliCati02?5 Complete and submitted, staff was spending excessive
time at the front counter and the experience was hectic for the
public and Staff. Durin.- this Period many of the depar`.men? 's
other duties had to be neglected. Later in the Fear, staff was
under .rov:ing pressure to co,-M_ late processing ^ The numer OL's
residential ,_,ilding plans t1':at had been received in such a short
time. --o move these along, it was necessary to Contract with a:?
Outside p I an checker. Part Of tl',e reason f0.r th15 uneven
workload is because in prior years l--e pipet i:le_ replaceme:::
program resulted ir a guarteri\' alloCation 0f water -
ian!?i!?g Si q?� „_C-h :ieO tl t ✓ .�i C w� ?e effeC Or spreading work OL'.
Over the Course Of the Fear. ±? 1987 rear Ofit Pccou'nted fcr
mcsS of the al.ocati Ol'., and no cuarterly System i5 Specified
the retrofit guidelines. -'
1+.-.77R .i L...07A_i0- .:\."DIAL .._.:,RT •
P.AGr 9
C. RECOMMENDED PROCEDURAL CLARIFICATIONS FOR THE 1988
ALLOCATION
The following clarifications and minor modifications are
recommended to the existing of orating procedures and retro. it
g.lideIines. These are intended to be in addition to tile exist;ng
procedures. Where there is a co:ifIict with the existil:g
procedures, these revisions shall prevail.
1. Placement on Water Waiting List.
a. There shall be one master waiting list which shall list
all applicants in the chronological order based on the time
of City staff acceptance of an application as complete for
filing.
b. To be placed on the list, the applicant must submit to
the Community Development Department an application and fees
for a Coastal Development Permit (CDP), two sets of building
plans, a building permit partial prepayment fee of 550.00,
and any other necessary approvals such as a Conditional Use
Permit or Variance. As part of an application package, an
applicant need nut submit Title 24 energy calculations, a
retrofit application, or seismic zone soils or engineering
studies.
For those projects on the master waiting list and \;Here
build;= permits can be issued in 1966, Title 24 energy
calculations, a retrofit application and seismic zone soils
or engineering studies shall be reauirec 120 Gays after an
application has been deemed com>_Jlete. =f the materials nave
not been subm_'ted \' h4 n the time period spec" ied the
apr-2 cation sl:•a!l be D;acec. at the botlOm of the master
\•refit i"o ii5l.
C. All applicants for placement on tile Hater waiting list
%'4 be served by the Community Development Department staff
at the pub'' Co-unter on a Zirst Co -me - r5tserve basis.
Communi- y Development Department staff I', ei:he_
re\'ieK applications at the counter for comDieteness before
a CCentan Ce for _':lino, cr �= IiOt pcssi�Ie will revle\S
applications as soon as possible after _.._lial submittal.
T.^.E ::ate. and ;-me G= _.._t. al su oT, ticl Kibe recorded by
=icff O:1 1,^._c^cJi_iCal iOi. na1i:Ccli Gns recer\od i.. t1c ma_i
be ass'_g:]_d t]]E time Of 3:30 J..^... on t.^.E day are
received. f multiple apDlicati Ons are received 'n the mail
on the same day the_, shall be ranked inchronological ord_r
based 11non t^e a:pha Deti Cal Orde_ of _.._ Owner'_ name.
icati ons v: i I i be chec ,ec stri...l_v in tl;e order the•:
\•:ere se0. Reyi eK \v I CE t e rm i ne \'; mot,.^.Er SL'Dmiltal5
__c _OT-D t anc adeauate =.. terns of CC,itc_.._ `g
0
oATER ALLOCATFO\ - ANNUAL REPORT
PALL 10
necessary parts, and in terms of conformity to City codes
and standards as listed in the attached Appendix. In order
to provide service to others waiting to submit applications
or to conduct other business with the public, staff will not
engage in correcting or completing applications at the
counter. Submittals not in compliance, or containing
obvious errors or misrepresentations Hill be returned to the
applicant and will not he accepted for filing. No position
on the Hater waiting list will have been secured by the
applicant.
e. If the submittal is accepted for fil'ilig, a numbered
receipt for required fees will be issued. The time of
filing relative to other applicants will be established by
the number on the receipt and this will secure the
applicant's position on the water waiting list.
2. Maintenance of Water Waiting List
a. The water waiting list will be a two year list. The
number of places on the list will be limited to twice the
number of units of each type approved by the Council for the
current year. For example, when the Council sets the
allocation for 1988 staff will multipl3• the allocation by a
factor of two (2), thus establishing the maximum number of
openings on the two year list. Again, the list will consist
of the actual 1988 allocations, and an estimate of the 1989
allocation. No guarantees are made by the Council that
applicants who's positions appear on the second year portion
of the waiting list will be able to receive an allocation
that second year. The determination of the number of awards
for each raw year can only be made by Council at the outset
of each new year. Any excess names on the list Wili 'be
Bu tOmatically carried foreward to the following year..
b. Positions on the water Waiting list shall be fixed at
the time Of Original filing Of an application. Positions oil
the .is: mey not be exchanged betv:een applicants or altered
.11 any other wal Any application that becomes invalid, Or
15 withdrawn will be dropped from the list the applicant
must submit a new application in order to again be piaced on
the list. The original position cannot be retained.
C. For the 1988 allocation, and in order to begin the water
waiting list, those applicalts that had submitted a complete
application but did not receive an allocation because t1ie
1987 list was cut off and closed, shall be offered an
ODDOrtllnity t0 resubmit their aJplicatior.s and be placed on
the new list fcr 1988. There were i 1 ap�rox_mately 5 such
applications for single family residences.
• 0
'AATE'R .ALLOCHT:ON r,E?Ui:T
i-'HGE-7 I1
3. Quarterly Water Award System
a. in order to ensure compliancc to Coastal
Priorities, and to even out the processir:g of permits
ti?rough the course of the year, the quarterly awards =_ stcm
established in the operating procedures avid related Coastal
Commission permits for the pipeline replacement program will
be the basis of all Crater awards, whether through the
pipeline program or the. retrofit program.
b. The quarterly awards will be made administratively four
times a year, but mill be reported to the Planning
Commission in a written staff report showing the awards made
by priol-ity classification.
4. Building Plan Checking
a. Plan checking will commence as soon as possible
following all. other discretionary and administrative permit
approvals by the city and following the quarterly award of
water affecting the individual project. No plan checking
will be performed prior to the quarterly water award.
1'. RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Under Measure "F", allow 77 residential units to be approved
in 1988; 27 to be multi -family and 50 to be single family
residences.
While the ratio of single Tamil." versus multi -family housing
is proposed to be altered slightly from last year, this is
necessary to provide enough multi -family units to serve 1/2
r
the ?Siii C senior e while
Proj ct v,'h_stiff allow -�_-
iari:etL']tl—rdmi!U:71t 5. L; <t1. ha rlor?e _� ami-
N.
._l
residences w'lr si. l zb50rD last years' bacKiog of oppi:cat oa
while ailowil:g additional new applications. 5
justifiCat i011 for the
cbility pr OD05a- 15 Gased On
tthe Ci ty'S
0 allow managed grovrt11 and still remain n'it::ir. the
1 dIn, orth under local ordinances and Coastal
Commission approval. 77 units in 1967 would appear to be
C Ons i s t en w:t11 Measure - guidelines. Ne=sure "F'• allows
an average of 70-units per %ear; however,
the izn' zllOws
ustments bettreen 63-77 t0 ac'leve the allotted a':erage
g"O Kt11 rate.
�dj,sting the number up may mean tha= ;n later years tale
t Ota_ number p_ u11it5 all
ON'ed COLId be reduced be
low 70
units. it trill become Important to monitor :thEse num
bers
ne fl}: intn rO°ieasure
een muit1—f ami?y arld 5i11 - recommended
ommended
i1G'--e C105eiy matches hi ctOri Cal development patterns and
di50 al lOt':s all applicants curre tit-
.ami _ category to procced tll;smc.t/-
WATER ALiOCAT=•- ,_,NN. :AL REPORT
PAGE 12
2. provide for a special approach to administer People's Self
Help Housing Corporation's project by allocating multi-
family units under Pleasure F and the necessary water
equivalencies over a two year period rather than the normal
sinnle year method.
PSHHC project will likely need 15 water equivalencies from
the multi -family category. Five of the remaining awards are
assumed to go to other multi -family projects. :'his would
mean the PSHHC would be short an award of 20 multi -family
units.
To allow the 40-unit project as part of the usual allocation
program would cause the single family/multi-family
residential historical mix prescribed under Measure "F" to
be exceeded. Measure "F" does exempt non-profit, public
facilities from building limitations, however, the language
in Pleasure "F" would appear not to exempt this project.
Because there are'not enough multi -family units available in
one year, this would require PSHHC to construct the project
over a two year period. PSHHC's funding sources require
that all 40 units be under construction this year.
Consequently, it is suggested the project be permitted by
allocating one-half of the water in 1988, and committing to
allocate the remaining one-half in 1989. The project could
not be authorized for occupancy until the 1989 water award
is approved. Although the project will commence in 1988, it
is not expected to be complete until 1989 thereby making
this option an acceptable match. The findings are unique to
this publicly -assisted housing project.
3. Withhold the distribution of equivalencies accrued through
the pipeline replacement program in 1987. instead, place
the entire pipeline savings into reserve.
LaFC
recommends that no equivalencies should be distributed
under pipeline replacement. Attempts to measure saviI�s
resulting from this program remain statis:icaliN.
inconclusive at this time. There are nonetheless tangible
social benefits to the program; pipeline replacement
up.trades an antiquated water system and does provide better
_ire flow protection. Tl7is is not to suggest that pipeline
replacement does not save water. :t would appear that some
savings does occur. However, rather than "spending" tl:e
savings, a more conservative philosophy would suggest
reserving the extra emount in the interest Of proper
stewardship of the City's limited groundwater resource.
Because the Council is committee to serving the PS-HC
project in north Morro Bay, staff recommends that a limited
allocation of pipeline replacement water of 15 water
equivalencies be provided to this public purpose project.
r.l L.. .._-\l'. .�. J� ::..\t .mil 1. tIL JIJ::T •
. .GE 1 3
4. Allow applicants to continue with the off —site retrofit
program under the Measure "F" guidelines for 19C7.
Although retrofit savings have vet ;o n:aet U',e predicted
level of savings of c 2 to 1 ratio, the program is saving
\•ater. It should be continue•: un;ess ca j,f�S are 5110\C:5 llOt
to be tak4ng place.
5. Modify retrofit formulas.
Existing ordinances and the City's approved coastal permit
require a 200 percent savings. To obtain this level of
s-avinss based on existing data, and erring on the side o'
conservatism, 22 residences would be required to be
retrofitted for each new single fami1v residence proposed
using conventional fixtures.
The Council should also consider adjusting the permit
requirement for a 3:1 ratio when retrofitting commercial
developments downward to the 2:1 ratio now applicable to all
other development, crater saved no matter what the source
would be the dominant mission, and commercial developments'
often use as much and more. water than residential consumers.
Further, some commercial uses are high coastal priority uses:
and it seems undesirable to maize _ more difficult for these
hinds of uses to successfully retrofit.
APPENDIX "A"
TABLE 1
1987 WATER ALLOCATION SUMMARY
FOR WATER DISTRIBUTED
UNDER THE PIPELINE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM
TYPE OF
NO. OF PROJECTS
EQUIVALENCIES
USE
AWARDED WATER
AWARDED
1.
Commercial.Fishing
0
0
2.
Coastal Dependent/Related
0
0
3.
Public Services
0
0
4.
Public Recreation
0
0
5.
Commercial Recreation
0
0
6.
Low —Cost Accommodations
0
0
(Campgrounds)
7.
Other Visitor Serving Accomodations 0
0
(Hotels/Hotels)
8.
Other Visitor Serving Uses
0
0
9.
Other Commerical/Office Uses
5
3.75
10.
Industrial Uses
i
2.0
__.
Low/^ioderate income Housing
0
0
12.
Single Family
13
12.84
_....
�iulti-iami 1 ,- (No Subdivision)
0
O
14.
"iulti—Family (infill Subdivision)
0
0
15.
^iulti—Family (Non—in=ill Sub)
0
0
18.59
11
E
APPENDIX "A"
TABLE 2
MEASURE "F" CONFORMANCE
I. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
WATER EQUIVALENCY
UNITS
UNITS
A.
ALLOWABLE
- Single Family
54
N/A
- Multi-Fami13'
16
N/A
70
B.
ACTUAL
- Single Family
54
54.0
- Multi -Family
16
9.'8
70
63.78
II.
COM':ERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT
A.
ALLOWABLE
(130a) X
(W.E. allocated to residences)
1.3 x
63.78 = 82.91
B.
AC-1U Ai
new commercial expansions
-,79
APPENDIX
"B''
TABLE 3
Equivalencies Earned 1977 - 67
Linear feet of
Total miles
Equivalencies
Fiscal Year"
pipe replaced replaced annually
earned"
1977-78
0
0
0
1978-79
2,400
.46
14.55
1979-80
7,250
1.37
43.94
1980-81
12,605
2.39
76.39
1981-82'
13,471
2.55
81.64
1982-83
6,771
1.28
41.04
1983-84
3,625
.69
21.97
1984-85
11,177
2.12
67.74
1985-86
16,805
3.18
101.85
1986-87
14,828
2.81
89.87
1987-88
7,435" "
1.41
45.06
Total To Date
96,367
18.26
584.05
Note:
` from 1973-77
the City installed
3.5 miles of
pipe; however,
pre-1977
replacement is not
credited toward
the present
allocation
program.
The recovery
model estimates that
one equivalency
is saved for
every 165
linear feet of line replaced,
or 32 equivalencies
per
mile.
•'• As of October
12, 1987.
APPENDIX "B"
TABLE 4
Equivalencies Earned and Awarded
to Date
A.
Total
No.
ov Equivalencies
Earned by
Line
Replacement
1977 to Present -
584.05
B.
Total
No.
of Equivalencies
Awarded
1982
to
Present-
435.71
C.
Total
No.
of Equivalencies
Awarded,
but Unused.and
Expired -
95.85
D.
Total
No.
of Equivalencies
Currently
Available
for award
244.15
^
C
C
ry
P
l
1
1 I
�
11
G
n
n
0
P
V
'-
a•1
b
P
n
P
p
b
n
N
a'I
ry
n
P
_
p•
_
n
a1
V
V
b
b
y
^•
`�
h
n
n
ry
ry
1.
_
n
P
a
n
Lnr
n
G
c•
..
n
^
N
0 0
APPENDIX "B''
TABLE 6
Pipeline Replacement Schedule
(in miles)
Fiscal
Year
Original Schedule
Projected in the
Water Recovery
Allocation Model
----------------
Annual Cumulative
Actual
Through
1987
Annual
Projected
Completion
Annual Commulative
Pre-
1977-78%
3.5 3.5
3.5
3.5
1977-78
.8 4.3
0
3.5
1978-79
.4 4.7
.46
3.96
1979-80
2.5 7.2
1.37
5.33
1980-81
3.9 11.1
2.39
7.72
1981-82
2.8 13.9
2.55
10.27
1982-83
3.0 16.9
1.28
11.55
1983-84
2.5 19.4
.69
12.24
1934-85
2.0 21.4
2.12
14.36
1985-86
2.5 23.9
3.18
17.54
1986-87
2.5 26.4
2.81
20.35
1987-88
1.6 28
1.411*
21.76
1986-89
- 25
24.56
1989-90
2.8 27.36
i990-91
.64 28.00
Note:
Pre
1977-78 replacement
is no - t included
in calculating
equivalencies earned for award
under the allocation
model.
Pipe
replaced as of October
12, 1987
... Public works estimates that
between 15,000
to 20,000 linear feet
of pipe
are Vo be replaced
per fiscal year.
Figures show a
minimum replacement of 15,000
feet per year.
APPENDIX "C"
TABLE 7
STATUS OF RETROFIT APPLICATIONS
1987
APPLICANT
PROJECT
DESC.
RETROFIT
DATE APP'D.
RETROFIT
PERMIT
PROPOSAL
BY DIRECTOR
COMPLETED_
WAY
D. Rodgers
SFR
11 Res.
3/12/87
3/24/87
Yes
D. Cook
SFR
11 Res.
3/12/87
87 3 11
/ /
Yes
Hurlbert/
Roberts
SFR
10 Res.
3/12/87
6/12/87
No
C. AXelson
SFR
12 Res.
3/12/87
5/20/87
Yes
M. Nause
SFR
10 Res.
3/16/87
6/1/87
Yes
S. Friesen
SFR
12 Res.
3/16/87
6/11/87
No
Hurlbert/
SFR
10.Res.
3/16/87
6/13/67
Yes
J. Nance
SFR
12 Res.
3/16/87
4/16/87
]"es
JoJ Denaucn
SFR
12 Res.
3/30/87 /
5/6/87
Yes
R. Leyva
SFR
12 Res.
3/30/87
5/6/S7
Yes
W. Brown
SFR
12 Res.
5/20/E7
7/15/87
Yes
W. looter
SFR
10 Res.
3/30/87
5/6/87
Yes
M. Gorman
SFR
12 Res.
3/30/8/
i/:J/E/
Yes
Nortnington
SFR
11 Res.
3/30/87
6/8/87
Yes
P. hyde
SFR
12 Res.
3/30/87.
5/7/87
t-e5
G. Holtz
SFR
16 Res.
3/30/67
4/14/g7
•`e5
R. ?fierce
SFR
10 Res.
3/30/87
7/24/87
_'es
C. Reyes
SFR
11 Res.
3/30/E7
7/15/87
Yes
R. Peterson
SFR
11 Res.
5/1E/87
5/27/S7
Yes
Scott
SFR
5 Res.
5/i8/E7
6/2/g7
Yes
(mobile home parlc)
RETROFIT STATUS •
PAGE 2
APPLICANT
M. Nalepa
J. Adamski
R. Pierce
T. Thorensen
J. Ramos
D. Hankins
J. Day
J. Day
J.E. Lindsey
Dan Reddell
Dan Reddell
Dan Reddell
D&K Mitchell
D. Van Anglen
Dale Reddell
Dale Reddell
R. Montgomery
K. Brocks
L. Bennington
F. Cummings
D. Smith
R. MCLaughlin
J. Machock
PROJECT
llESC.
SFR
SFR
SFR
SFR
SFR
SFR
SFR
SFR
SFR
SFR
SFR
SFR
SFR
SFR
SFR
SFR
SFR
SFR
SFR
1MF
IMF
1MF
9MF
RETROFIT DATE APP'D.
PROPOSAL BY DIRECTOR
10 Res.
3/30/87
11 Res.
4/30/87
11 Res.
3/30/87
14 Res.
3/30/87
13 Res.
5/20/87
11 Res.
4/8/87
12 Res.
4/8/87
13 Res.
4/8/87
1 Office
1 Restaurant
10 Res.
4/8/87
1 Restaurant
24 Motel Uts.
4/8/87
24 Motel Uts.
4/8/87
11 Res.
4/8/87
12 Res.
4/8/87
11 Res.
4/8/87
11 Res.
4/8/87
11 Res.
5/20/87
10 Res.
4/8/87
11 Res.
5/8/87
10 Res.
4/8/67
5 Res.
8/7/87
1 Res.
5/20/87
18 Motel Uts.
5/19/87
50 Res.
8/5/87
3 Com'l. Suites
BLDG.
RETROFIT
PERMIT
COMPLETED
ISSUED
5/12/87
Yes
5/18/87
Yes
7/24/87
Yes
7/31/87
Yes
5/7/87
Yes
5/4/87
Yes
5/4/87
Yes
6/9/87
Yes
6/17/87 Yes
8/3/87
i,o
7/27/87
Yes
7/27/87
Yes
5/28/87
Yes
5/28/87
Yes
9/28/87
Yes
5/21/87
Yes
5/29/87
Yes
5/11/87
Yes
5/11/87
Yes
9/3/87
N/A
No
8/10/87
x/A
6/31/87
No
RETROFIT STATUS
PAGE 3
•
•
PROJECT
RETROFIT
DATE APP'D.
RETROFIT
APPLICANT
..
DESC.
_..._.-._......_--
PROPOSAL
-- - ...._....
BY DIRECTOR
COMPLETED
V.
Ginder
Service "70-
Motel Uts.
8/7/87
Com'1. Proj.
E.
Miller
IMF
1 Res.
9/10/87
R.
Forester
3MF
7 Res.
9/15/87
9/2/87
T.
Dietrich
SFR
11 Res.
3/25/87
11/10/87
Dan
Reddell
SFR
11 Res.
4/8/87
8/27/67
41 SFR's 500
residences
16 MF's 136
motel units,
6
commercial
suites
" Retrofitted showerheads G six toilets only.
DLDG.
PERMIT
ISSUED
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
E
APPENDIX "C"
TABLE 8
SUMMARY OF STRUCTURES RETROFITTED
1985 — 1987
TYPE OF STRUCTURE 1985 1986 1987
1. Residences (includes sfr S mf) 61 718 500
2. Church 1 0 0
3. Commercial Buildings
4. Motel Units
15 8 6
164 114 136
TOTAL
1,279
0
29
414
APPENDIX "C"
TABLE 9
RETROFIT SAMPLE WITH SIX METER READING PERIODS (ONE YEAR)
AFTER THE NEW FIXTURES WERE INSTALLED
44 Meters
Uses
37 single family residences
30 apartment units
3 commercial 'buildings
70 total structures
APPENDIX "C"
TABLE 10
COMPARISON OF PAST RETROFIT WATER USAGE TO THREE YEAR AVERAGE FOR
ANALOGOUS TIME PERIOD
A. Meters
18 meters
26
B. Structures
23 residential units
47 residential units
3 commercial suites
usage increased after retrofit
usage decreased after retrofit
usage increased after retrofit
usage decreased after retrofit
usage decreased -after retrofit
• APPENDIX "C" •
TE.BLE 11
Net Decrease in Water Use, Typical Fixtures
A. Observed decrease in water (total for sample)
Average water used Actual water Observed A change
during analogous use some time difference
time past 3 years after retrofit
674767 cu ft. 615500 cu ft. 59267 8.7%
B. Observed versus perdicted decline
NO. of Samples Predicted Observed Difference
Decrease Decrease
44 116615 cu ft. 59267cu ft. 57348cu ft.
per sample 2563 cu ft. 1262 cu ft. 1301 cu ft.
Thus, while formulas were aiming for 200q of demand the observed
savings is only 100% of demand, that is, instead of seeing 2.0
equivalencies for every 1.0 needed, only 1 equivalency is saved for
every one needed.
APPENDIX "C"
TABLE 12
WATER USE OF 50 RANDOMLY SELECTED
NON —RETROFITTED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES
Water Use hater Use Per SFR
(cubic feet
Time Period ) (cubic feet)
31 Jul 86 to
30 Sep 85 392,200 8716
31 Jul 87 to
30 Sep 86 415,300 9439
MINIMUM BUILDING YALN RF.QL'IREMl.-N1'S FOR NEW
DEVELOPMENT IN 1988
A. Til'L.E BLOCK SHOWING:
I. name Gf applicant/property ov,ner
'• applicant's/property owier's address ar,d telephone
number
3. agent's address and telephone number (if any)
4. property's legal description
5. property's Assessor's number
B. S 77 _PLAN _SHOWING:
I . property lines and dimensions of lot
2. location of buildings
3. street locations t .�i on and ez_sti vridtl•s
4. easement locations (if any)
5. location of proposed access, driveways, and curb cuts
6. location of parking widths spaces, garages and respective
7.
fence locations (if any)
C. I=IG T CONTROL (FOR SLOPING LOTS ONLY) SHOWING:
1. contour lines or spot elevations of the subject
propertx
2. cross section Of subject property including residence
D. CONSTRUCTION PLANS' SHOWING:
-. Ioundation -o
2• floor =r-ami nc DJ aroof
4. construciton section
1• connection. detail,
6. material soec__;catiG:-.s
-.11 plans shall be --
CITY OF MORRO BAY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: HONORABLE: MAYOR DATE: JANUARY 14, 1987
AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: WATER ADVISORY BOARD
SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MANDATORY RETROFIT
BACKGROUND:
On November 9, 1987, the City Council discussed the issue of
requiring structures in the City of Morro Bay to be retrofit
with water -saving devices on a mandatory basis. The City
Council tabled discussion of this item pending review and
recommendation of .the matter by the Water Advisory Board.
The Water Advisory Board discussed this item at their
meetings on December 9, 1987 and January 13, 1988. The
focus of their discussion centered around the City
Attorney's staff report to the City Council dated September
28, 1987. In the staff report three options were presented:
I. The City could retrofit every structure in town with
City Employees at City expense and then sell the water
equivalencies saved to individual builders.
2. The City could require on penalty of violation of law
every home in the City to be retrofit even without the
homeowner's consent.
3. The City Could require a building to be retrofit as a
condition of sale of that building.
WATER ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION
On January 13, 1988, the Water Advisory Board unanimously
adopted a motion to the City Council recommending as
follows:
1. Implementation of mandatory retrofit options 1 and 2 as
described in the City Attorney's report are not
warranted at this time.
E
WAC MANDATORY RETROFIT RECOMMENDATIONS
Page Two
2. The Water Advisory Board recommends the City Council
develop and implement an ordinance to require mandatory
retrofit of buildings in the City of Morro Bay on the
sale of property, issuance of a City building permit
for any improvements of a value in excess of $1,000, or
on a voluntary basis.
The Water Advisory Board provided supplemental
recommendations regarding the implementation of a program as
follows:
1. The City would sell water equivalency units and
reimburse the retrofitter. Retrofit expenses would be
repaid to the retrofitter in accordance with the City's
presently -established formula.
2. No water or sewer fee credits would be given to
developers acquiring water for projects by retrofit.
The revenues received by the City for water and sewer
connection fees would be used to reimburse the
retrofitter per the presently established cost formula.
3. All water equivalencies recovered through retrofit
would be placed into the water allocation "pool" to be
issued by the City per the City's present water
allocation model.
GHN/dr
RESOLUTION NO. 9-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY
ESTABLISHING NEW WATER AND SEWER AVAILABILITY CHARGES
FOR THE VARIOUS CITY WATER ALLOCATION PROGRAMS
WHEREAS, the City has established a water equivalency
program for the allocation of water to new users in a reasonable
and orderly fashion; and
WHEREAS, the City has established an availability charge for
recovery of a proportionate share of the cost of infrastructure
in the water and sewer systems from the new user; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that adjustments in
availability charges is necessary to clarify the pricing system
for water allocation;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds these fees are necessary for
the usual and current expenses of the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay that the following schedule of fees is adopted
effective February 22, 1988 and thereafter.
FEES PER WATER EQUIVALENCY PROGRAM
Pipeline Replacement Equivalency:
Water Availability Charge $2,750.00
Sewer Availability Charge 2,750.00
Total $5,500.00
Retrofit Equivalency:
Water Availability Charge $ 700.00
Sewer Availability Charge 687.50
Total $1,387.50
Blended Equivalency:
Water Availability Charge $1,725.00
Sewer Availability Charge 1,718.75
Total $3,443.75
0
RESOLUTION NO. 9-88
PAGE TWO
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Morro
Bay at a regular meeting thereof held on the,22nd day of
February, 1988 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Odell, Sheetz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Lemons, Reddell
ATTEST:
6 eu �-�Q
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
z4z�i-� -
PAUL DONNELLY, Mayor Pleo Tem
RESOLUTION NO. 08-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MORRO BAY, DENYING AN APPEAL TO MODIFY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 41-86 (AMENDED) FOR A VACUUM TYPE FISH OFFLOADING DEVICE
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Morro Bay,
California, did on the 19th day of October, 1987, hold a duly
noticed PUBLIC HEARING, after which they approved with conditions
the request of Orval Leage for a Conditional Use Permit to allow
the continued use of a vacuum type fish offloading device for
property located at 235 Main Street in the WF/PD zone (Case No.
CUP 41-86 (Amended); and
WHEREAS, on November 18, 1987, the applicant did appeal the
Planning Commission's action requesting modification to certain
conditions of approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Morro Bay,
California, on the 25th day of January, 1988 held a duly
noticed PUBLIC HEARING on said appeal; and
WHEREAS, at said PUBLIC HEARING, after considering the staff
report, Planning Commission's report, and the testimony, both
written and oral, of all persons wishing to testify, the City
Council did find the following facts and reasons to justify the
denial of said appeal:
1. The use requested is properly one for the R-1/PD and WF/PD
zones, and is consistent with the policies and objectives of
the Morro Bay General Plan and Certified Local Coastal
Program;
2. The conditions of approval established by the Planning
Commission will insure that the use will not be detrimental
to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare
of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of
this proposed use;
3. The conditions of approval established by the Planning
Commission will insure that the use will not be injurious or
detrimental to property and improvements in the neighborhood
or general welfare of the City.
WHEREAS; as a result of circumstances beyond the control of
the applicant, CUP 41-86 (Amended) would have expired on January
19, 1988, unless extended by the Council,
L7
City Council Resolution No. 08-88
Page Two
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and
constitute the findings of the Council in this matter; and,
2. That the Council does hereby deny the appeal of Orval Leage.
3. That the Council does hereby grant a 90 day extension of CUP
41-86 (Amended) to allow adequate time for the appellant to
comply with the Conditions of Approval set by the Planning
Commission. The extension will expire on April 30, 1988.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, on the 8th day of February,
1988, by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
TFr- 19VT5,-L`ify r T er
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Case No. CUP 41-86
STANDARD CONDITIONS
1. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for the land
described in the application and any attachments thereto,
and as shown on the plot plan labeled Exhibits A through E
and on file with the Community Development Department. The
locations of all buildings and other features shall be
located and designed substantially as shown on the
aforementioned exhibits, unless otherwise specified herein.
2. Unless the construction or operation of the structure or
facility is commenced not later than one (1) year after the
effective date of this approval and is diligently pursued
therafter, this approval will automatically become null and
void; provided, however, that upon the written request of
the applicant, prior to the expiration of this approval, an
extension for not more than one (1) additional year may be
granted by the Community Development Director, upon finding
that the project complies with all applicable provisions of
the Morro Bay Municipal Code in effect at the time of the
extension request.
3. Any minor change may be approved by the Community
Development Director. Any substantial change will require
the filing of an application for an amendment of be
considered by the Planning Commission.
4. All requirements of any law, ordinance or regulation of the
State of California, City of Morro Bay, and any other
governmental entity shall be complied with in the exercise
of this approval.
5. Prior to obtaining a building permit and within thirty (30)
days hereof, the applicant shall file with the Director of
Community Development written acceptance of the conditions
stated herein.
6. Compliance with and execution of all conditions listed
hereon shall be necessary, unless otherwise specified, prior
to obtaining final building inspection clearance. Deviation
from this requirement shall be permitted only by written
consent of the Community Development Director and/or as
authorized by the Planning Commission. Failure to comply
with these conditions shall render this entitlement null and
void. Continuation of the use without a valid entitlement
will constitute a violation of the Morro Bay Municipal Code
and is a misdemeanor.
I • •
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CUP 41-86
PAGE TWO
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
7. The subject machine shall not be operated on Saturdays, but
may be operated on Sundays, but only between the hours of
12:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m.
8. Use of the machine shall be permitted on Monday through
Friday only and shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m.
to 6:00 p.m.
9. No trucks used to transport fish unloaded by the subject
machine shall be loaded or unloaded, driven onsite or
allowed to run their motors between the hours of 8:00 p.m.
and 7:00 a.m.
10. Truck traffic for transporting fish unloaded by the subject
machine shall be limited to not more than five (5) trips to
and from the site per day.
11. Prior to final clearance for the building permit issued to
the applicant to install the electrically operated vacuum -
type fish unloadding device, a noise investigation shall be
performed by staff. In the event the investigation
concludes that the new device exceeds prescribed noise
levels, its operation shall be immediately abated until
noise is properly attenuated. A noise engineer shall be
employed to properly muffle the device at the applicant's
expense. In the event the electric device is abated, the
applicant shall be allowed to operate the diesel pump.
Neither machine, either diesel powered or electrically
powered shall be in operation at the same time. Once the
electric unit has been properly baffled, if necessary, the
diesel unit shall be removed. If the electric fish pump
cannot be properly muffled, it shall be removed and replaced
with the diesel fish pump. The diesel fish pump shall be
permanently mounted and noise attenuated with adequate
baffling approved by a noise engineer.
• RESOLUTION NO. 7-88 •
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY
AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR
GRANT FUNDING OF A FISH
CLEANING STATION AT TIDELANDS PARR
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay has need for the development
of a new fish cleaning station at Tidelands Park pursuant to the
Park Master Plan approved in October, 1986; and
WHEREAS, the Tidelands Boundary Agreement requires the
relocation of said fish cleaning station from its current site to
a site north of Station 42 as designated on the Tidelands
Settlement Map; and
WHEREAS, a design for the fish cleaning station was approved
in 1985 by the Harbor Advisory Board; and
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay desires to construct a fish
cleaning station at Tidelands Park in cooperation with the State
of California under the Wildlife Conservation Board's Program;
and
WHEREAS, the fish cleaning station at Tidelands Park is for
the purpose of sport fishing and other recreation in the public
interest, and would benefit the people of this area as well as
the State generally;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council
approves of the fish cleaning station for Tidelands Park and
authorizes the application of State Wildlife Conservation Board
funding of the proposed project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council appoints the
City Administrator as agent of the City of Morro Bay to conduct
all business which may be necessary for the completion of the
fish cleaning station.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Morro
Bay at a regular meeting held on this 8th day of February, 1988
by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
DALE REDDELL
ATTEST:
ARDITH DAVIS
CITY CLERK
4
RESOLUTION NO. 6-88
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS OF TRACT 1028
ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC, ACCEPTING AN OFFER OF DEDICATION OF
A STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT WITH IMPROVEMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE
PUBLIC, AUTHORIZING THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND AUTHORIZING THE RELEASE OF
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT BONDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
APPROVED SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, on March 25, 1985 the Morro Bay City Council
did, by the adoption of Resolution No. 20-85, approve the
Final Map of Tract 1028, accept the offers of dedication
thereon specified contingent upon construction, inspection
and approval of required improvements and approved a
Subdivision Improvement Agreement for said Tract; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has constructed said required
improvements and requested final inspection pursuant to
Section 16 of said Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has caused said final
inspection to occur; and
WHEREAS, said final inspection indicates that the
constructed improvements substantially conform to the
approved improvement plans; and
WHEREAS, the construction of required improvements
necessitated connection to previously constructed private
storm drainage facilities on an adjacent property; and
WHEREAS, the owner of said adjacent property has agreed
to dedicate said private storm drainage facility for public
use and maintenance; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has prepared a grant of easement
and legal description for said dedication; and
WHEREAS, it is in the interest of public health and
welfare for said dedication to be accepted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Morro Bay does hereby approve and accept off -
site improvements for Tract 1028 on behalf of the public and
into the City of Morro Bay's maintenance system.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Grant of Easement for
storm drain purposes made by the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter Day Saints be accepted on behalf of the public.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Administrator be
authorized to cause recordation of a Notice of Completion
for Tract 1028 and appropriate documents for acceptance of
said storm drainage easements at the office of the San Luis
Obispo County Recorder.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Administrator be
authorized to release improvement bonds for Tract 1028
pursuant to Section 18, et seq, of the approved Subdivision
Improvement Agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Morro Bay at a regular meeting held on the 8th Day of
February, 1988, by the following vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Reddell -a��
PAUL DONNELLY, Mayor Pfo Tem
ATTEST:
� City
AR DAVIS,DAM S, City Clerk
1
� V
' Lf
/ \O
f
1T&SCADEPO N040
CITY OF MORRO BAY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETION
The undersigned hereby certifies that the construction of
Offsite Public Improvements for Tract 1028
by James Merzon, et al, has been inspec—
ted and found to comply with the approved plans and specifi—
cations and has been accepted as having been completed in
accordance therewith.
It is, therefore, requested that the City Clerk
file a Notice of Completion.
By: �� 1LlG�✓ t .
Title: nirartnr of Public Works
Date: 1/29/38
.. l 0 •
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the undersigned City Clerk of the
City of Morro Bay, San Luis Obispo County, California, that the
construction of Offsite Public Imorovements for Tract 1028
in the City of Morro Bay, has been completed by James Merzon, et al,
and that said work was accepted as completed on FabrearyS.
ARD1TH DAVIS, City Clerk
City of Morro Bay, California
The undersigned hereby deposes and says:
That she is the City Clerk of the City of Morro Bay, San Luis
Obispo County, California; that she has read the foregoing notice
and knows the contents thereof; that the same is true of her own.
knowledge.
I declare the foregoing to be true under penalty of perjury.
Executed at Morro Bay, California, this L- day of rC&1zvA(2Y
19a.
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
0
0
I?gl -#- 1-5
RESOLUTION NO. 5-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MORRO BAY, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE PRELIMINARY
GENERAL PLAN FOR ATASCADERO STATE BEACH
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Morro Bay,
California, on the 25th day of January, 1988 held a duly noticed
PUBLIC HEARING to consider the Preliminary General Plan for
Atascadero State Beach; and,
WHEREAS, Atascadero State Beach is located within the City
of Morro Bay, and the present and future uses of the State Beach
are of vital interest to the City; and
WHEREAS, the City has a certified Local Coastal Program
which sets forth various planning objectives for Atascadero State
Beach, and provides for a coastal development permit process
regulating future development within the state beach; and
WHEREAS, the City has actively participated with the staff
of the State Department of Parks and Recreation to assist their
understanding of the LCP and the City's concerns about
improvements within the park unit; and
WHEREAS, the staff of the State Department of Parks and
Recreation has been cooperative with the City throughout the
planning process, and has been sensitive to City concerns; and
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay finds the Preliminary General
Plan for Morro Strand and Atascadero State Beach to be in
compliance with the general provision of the certified LCP Land
Use Plan, yet there remain several recommendations made by the
Council or City staff that are not presently included in the
Preliminary General Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay, California, as follows:
1. The City endorses the Preliminary General Plan and
recommends its adoption to the State Parks Commission,
subject to the inclusion of the following;
(a) The State should participate in proportionate share of
future costs of signalization of Highway One at Yerba
Buena Street, the principal access to the State Beach;
11
0
City Council Resolution No. 5-88
Page Two
(b) Drainage improvements at the State Beach may be needed
in order to properly function with the City's system;
(c) Additional dressing rooms, or similar screened areas
for beach users in the vicinity of the park entrance
should be provided.
(d) The State should maximize public parking spaces at the
seaward end of Hatteras Street.
2. The City Council of the City of Morro Bay commends the State
Parks staff for a quality planning program and general
responsiveness to the City's concerns.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay, on the 25th day of January, 1988, by the
following vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
DALE REDDELL, Mayor
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 4-88
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MORRO BAY ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND DENYING A REQUEST
FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TO ALLOW A SECOND POLE SIGN TO REMAIN ON SITE
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
CASE NO. CUP 38-84 (REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT)
WHEREAS, on October 15, 1984, at the request of Jerry
Hempenius, applicant herein, the Planning Commission approved CUP
38-84 approving a Conditional Use Permit to confirm the existing
use and to allow additions/alterations to the existing motel sub-
ject to certain conditions; and
WHEREAS, Special Condition Number 18 of said CUP 38-84 re-
quired the applicant to remove an existing illegal pole sign on
Market Street within five (5) years; and
WHEREAS, Applicant, on October 24, 1984, appealed the Plan-
ning Commission's decision complaining of several of the condi-
tions imposed including Special Condition Number 18; and
WHEREAS, on February 25, 1985, the City Council denied the
applicant's appeal thus leaving his CUP 38-84 subject to all of
the special conditions; and
WHEREAS, on September 23, 1987, Jerry Hempenius, the same
applicant herein applied to the Planning Commission for an Amend-
ment to CUP 38-84 requesting that portion of Special Condition
Number 18, which required him to remove the illegal pole sign
within five (5) years be deleted; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Morro Bay,
California, after a duly notice public hearing on the 7th day of
December, 1987, did deny the request of Jerry Hempenius to amend
a Conditional Use Permit to allow a second pole sign to remain on
property located at 1080 Market Avenue in the VS-C/R-3/PD zone,
more particularly described as:
APN 66-0398-09
Lots 10, 11 and 12, Block 47
Town of Morro Bay Tract
City of Morro Bay
and
WHEREAS, on December 17, 1987, Applicant did appeal the
Planning Commission's action to the City Council; and
Resolution No. 4-88•
Page 2
•
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Morro Bay did on
January 11, 1988, hold a duly noticed public hearing on said
appeal; and
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, after considering the staff
reports, the Planning Commission's report on this matter, and the
testimony, both oral and written, of all persons wishing to tes-
tify at the hearing, the City Council did make the following
findings and took the following actions:
1. That the existing pole sign at Market Street, the sub-
ject in Special Condition Number 18, of which the ap-
plicant has complained, is one of the signs made non-
conforming by the Municipal Code in 1972 and required
to be abated within eleven (11) years of October 1,
1972 or on or before October 1, 1983; and
2. That said pole sign should be abated in accordance with
17.68.155 in the same manner as other signs made non-
conforming by the Municipal Code in 1972 and required
to be abated on or before October 1, 1983; and
3. That because Municipal Code Section 17.68.155 has al-
ready established a time and manner by which said pole
sign must be abated, that portion of Special Condition
Number 18 granting the applicant an additional five (5)
years to remove the pole sign on Market Street is inap-
propriate and is hereby stricken and deleted. CUP 38-
84 is hereby amended to reflect said deletion; and
4. That the remaining conditions both standard and special
( and not the subject of the request for an amendment)
remain in full force and effect pursuant to the find-
ings made and basis therefore set forth at the time
said CUP 38-84 was granted; and
5. The amendment made herein, will not, under the circum-
stances of this particular case, be detrimental to the
health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare fo
the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of
this use; and
6. The Amendment made will not be injurious or detrimental
to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the
general welfare of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and
constitute the findings of the Council in this matter;
and
Resolution No. 4-88•
Page 3
2. That the Council does hereby deny the Applicant's re-
quest in Case No. CUP 38-84 to amend the Conditional
Use Permit to allow the pole sign on Market Street to
remain on site; and
3. That the Council does hereby amend CUP 38-84 to delete
that portion of Special Condition Number 18 granting
the applicant an additional five (5) years to remove
the pole sign on Market Street and directing that said
pole sign be abated in the same manner as other signs
made nonconforming by the Municipal Code in 1972 and
required to be abated on or before October 1, 1983.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Morro Bay City Council at a regu-
lar meeting thereof held on the 8th day of February, 1987 on the
following vote to wit:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Reddell
PAUL DONNELLY, Mayor'Pro Tem
ATTEST:
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 3-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY
7PPORTING THE VISIT OF THE GOLDEN HINDE
AND WAIVER OF DOCKAGE FEES
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, Morro Bay has a long and distinguished
maritime tradition and therefore takes pride in hosting The
Golden Hinde, a replica of the vessel sailed by Sir Francis
Drake in 1579; and
WHEREAS, The Golden Hinde will visit Morro Bay in
spring of 1988; and
WHEREAS, the 102-foot exact replica vessel provides a
unique opportunity for the communities of the Central Coast
to view the operations of a sixteenth century sailing
vessel; and
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay is proud to have an
opportunity for its residents as well as citizens from
surrounding areas to view this historic vessel when it
visits Morro Bay.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Morro Bay does hereby welcome The Golden Hinde
to Morro Bay and hereby waives all dockage charges in
further support of this event and encourages all citizens to
visit this historical vessel when it visits Morro Bay in
spring 1988.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Morro Bay at a regular meeting held on this 25th day of
January, 1988 by the following roll call vote: -
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: Odell
ATTEST:
RESOLUTION NO. 2-88
RESOLUTION ENDORSING THE "GOVERNMENT SPENDING
LIMITATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT" INITIATIVE
ON THE JUNE 1988 BALLOT
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, Californians for Quality Government is sponsoring
for the June 1988 ballot an initiative that would modify the cur-
rent Government Spending Limitation that would more accurately
reflect California's economic growth and spiraling service popu-
lations; and
WHEREAS, the current Government Spending Limitation has
threatened to halt all real increases and force reductions in ed-
ucation, law enforcement, health care, senior programs and other
vital services; and
WHEREAS, the Commission on State Finance reports that the
current limit could force over $23 billion in cuts in critical
public services over the next decade; and
WHEREAS, the current Government Spending Limitation is in-
flexible and inhibits the state's ability to use already -col-
lected tax dollars to at least maintain the current level of
funding for critical services; and
WHEREAS, this proposed initiative would modernize both the
cost of living and population formulas to more accurately re-
flect California's economic growth and changing needs and rede-
fine gas taxes as user fees so to provide much needed transporta-
tion dollars without adversely affecting other crucial public
services; and
WHEREAS, this initiative would ensure accountability to tax-
payers by requiring the existing Commission on State Finance to
report annually the manner in which state revenues are spent and
the amount of state appropriations subject to limitation; and
WHEREAS, the California League of Cities, the California
Teachers Association, California Business Properties Association,
California Federation of Teachers, California School Boards Asso-
ciation, California State PTA, California Community College
Trustees, California Tax Reform Association, California Associa-
tion of Homes for the Aging, California Association of Highway
Patrolmen, California Fire Chiefs Association, Peace Officers Re-
search Association of California, California State Employees As-
sociation, American Association of University Women - CA Divi-
sion, California State Council of Service Employees, California
Nurses Association, Professional Engineers in California Govern-
ment, and many others are in full support.
1
0 •
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay does fully support and endorse the "Government
Spending Limitation and Accountability Act" for the June 1988
ballot, and encourages its citizens to support the June 1988 Ini-
tiative for Quality Government.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Morro Bay City Council at a regu-
lar meeting thereof held on the 11th day of January, 1988 on the
following vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
DALE REDD L, Mayor
ATTEST:
ARDITH DAVIS, City Clerk
It
RESOLUTION NO. 01-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MORRO BAY
DECLARING MORRO BAY AN OFFICIAL
PORT -OF -CALL FOR THE REVENUE
CUTTER CALIFORNIAN
T H E C I T Y C O U N C I L
City of Morro Bay, California
WHEREAS, Morro Bay has a long and distinguished maritime
tradition and therefore takes pride in hosting the State tallship
CALIFORNIAN in 1988 and future years; and
WHEREAS, the CALIFORNIAN, a full scale replica of the 1848
Revenue Cutter C. W. Lawrence will visit Morro Bay in fall of
1988; and
WHEREAS, the 93-foot cutter provides a unique training
opportunity for youth of the State of California, recalling the
tallship heritage of previous generations of Californians; and
WHEREAS, the City of Morro Bay is proud to have an opportu-
nity for its residents as well as citizens from surrounding areas
to view this historic vessel when it visits Morro Bay.
NOW, TBEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Morro Bay does hereby declare Morro Bay to be an OFFICIAL
PORT -OF -CALL for the CALIFORNIAN and encourages all citizens to
visit this historical cutter when it visits Morro Bay in fall,
1988.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Morro
Bay at a regular meeting held on this llth day of January, 1988
by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Donnelly, Lemons, Odell, Sheetz, Reddell
NOES: None
i
ABSENT: None
i
DALE REDDELL
MAYOR
ATTEST:
R1Z �', s7%